Is this really necessary?? There is extraordinary little information on same of these pages, and no information on some of them that isn't already on another page, e.g. [Semitone].--Elindstr (talk) 04:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some sort of navbox is absolutely necessary. I'd like to see it expanded or combined with Template:Circle of fifths and a few key terms like pitch (music), note, scale (music) and maybe some of the major scale types (dorian, etc.), chord types, etc. Torc2 (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think those pitch articles should be renamed. They don't show up in many browsers (most notably IE). In the text, we've been replacing those with ((music|flat)) and ((music|sharp)) which allow for universal depiction of those characters. The template won't work in an article name, though. DavidRF (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree; the articles C♯ (musical note), D♭ (musical note), D♯ (musical note), E♭ (musical note), F♯ (musical note), G♭ (musical note), G♯ (musical note), A♭ (musical note), A♯ (musical note) and B♭ (musical note) should be moved to C-sharp (musical note), D-flat (musical note), D-sharp (musical note), E-flat (musical note), F-sharp (musical note), G-flat (musical note), G-sharp (musical note), A-flat (musical note), A-sharp (musical note) and B-flat (musical note). For some, this will need assistance from an administrator via WP:RM. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]