This template was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
The Tom Cruise mission - if any - would not be a space tourism activity. It would be professional activity. When Cruise goes to Dubai to shoot MI, you do not say this is tourism. Hektor (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's a non-professional space trip for purposes not related to the operation of space facilities nor space science nor government purposes. These have been term touristic in the press. Just as the Japanese reporter and the British lottery funded stunt flight have been (LA Times etc) Employees operating to host (ie. like a flight attendant) the spaceflight would not be tourists, like Michael López-Alegría and Peggy Whitson, who should be removed. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I disagree. It is a professional space trip. When you are a professional actor (Tom Cruise) or a director, and you go somewhere to shoot a movie, this is a professional trip. Hektor (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And there's the case of the Polaris Dawn: they are proposing to do such experimental things (like the EVA in SpaceX suits) that I'm having a hard time to call it "space tourism". It was ok with Inspiration4 since they whole deal was to bring the "regular person" into the game, but with Polaris seems something quite experimental for SpaceX (even considering Isaacman's funding). Erick Soares3 (talk) 21:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Hektor: and returning here: I think that we should establish which one of Axiom's flights are allowed here. As an example: if Ax-2 sends an Saudi Arabia crew (as it might happen - 1) I do think that they shouldn't be here, since they will be representing their government - but other users could dispute it. Erick Soares3 (talk) 13:28, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also why do we have Helen Sharman who is retroactively considered as space tourist in this template. Hektor (talk) 08:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I find problematic to call the flight of the two Saudi astronauts, Rayyanah Barnawi and Ali AlQarni, a space tourists mission. It is a commercial space flight, but not a touristic flight. Hektor (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
