Europe Template‑class
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

International relations Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Need to be changed--Spacejam2 (talk) 19:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean that it's not in the EU circle anymore, I fixed the file on Commons, but it won't update the image here. SiBr₄ (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad! Thanks for fixing my mistake SiBr4. That's what happens when I edit past my bedtime!

Sometimes it takes Commons a few hours (or days) to clear their cache of old images. TDL (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Err... The current version of the file on Commons is wrong. Croatia is in EU, and out of EEA, not the other way. Also Andorra does have the right to mint coins starting 1 of July. See the corresponding articles. —Volgar (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Croatia is now updated. Andorra should be added to the "Mints Euros" circle if it now de jure has the right to mint them. SiBr₄ (talk) 11:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Volgar: Croatia is correct on the file on commons, SiBr4 fixed it yesterday. It's probably just a caching issue for you as it looks correct to me (Croatia is in the EU and out of the EEA.)

As for Andorra, their treaty specifies that they have the right to mint euros as early as July 1, but they do not yet do so because they have not satisfied all the other requirements of the treaty. As the title of the circle is "mints euros", I think we should wait until they actually mint euros before adding them. TDL (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Mints Euros" until 2013-06-26 was "Agreement with the EU to mint Euros", now it is misleading if taken by word, since "Mints Euros" also applies to other countries. A file that shows the "Agreement with the EU to mint Euros" is found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Supranational_European_bodies_with_OSCE_members-en.svg TeraCard (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, if the text of the circle is changed back to "Agreement with the EU to mint Euros" then Andorra should be included. But as it stands now, it would be incorrect to include Andorra. TDL (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That file doesn't show the full "Agreement with EU to mint Euros" either: it shortens it to "€ mint". Also Moldova & Andorra are mixed up. SiBr₄ (talk) 19:09, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed "Mints euros" to "Monetary Agreement with EU" and included Andorra. This way we don't have to worry about whether they are actively minting euros, just that they have a MA authorizing them to use othe euro as their currency. TDL (talk) 05:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense: EEA is only a scaled down version of EU for members of EFTA and it's only possible to be a member of EFTA without being member of the EEA, not member of EU. Here is the article: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d2206187-87e4-4afd-9083-6f9f0dab2967 . Contrary to this one http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/Iceland_Likely_to_Extend_Restrictions_on_Croatians_0_401527.news.aspx transitional provisions to freedom of movement of workers is decided by each member of EEA individually and not related to a membership in EEA in general http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_for_workers

Is this section resolved already? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doremon764 (talk) 05:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it appropriate to add a group of four largely unrecognized countries? The page for this group even states that it is commonly known was the Commonwealth of Unrecognized States. Austin Harper 19:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They should be moved inside the EPC circle 2601:181:4500:39A:5500:32B3:1FA3:DC82 (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth having the European Political Community here? It seems undue. CMD (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe its inclusion is warranted and surpasses WP:N requirements. It's relatively new in the political arena, but, its creation seems to have garnered a lot of attention as a new pan-European initiative rivaling the CoE. The EPC seems to be developing quite rapidly into a prominent structure focusing on the future of Europe, and has already been endorsed by major European powers and political figures. Since inception, it now includes nearly every state in Europe and is set to meet twice annually to discuss critical topics (war, conflict, energy security, trade) affecting millions of Europeans. Archives908 (talk) 04:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what relevance WP:N has to do with this template, the notability is not at issue. The question is whether it merits inclusion in this selective template. As it stands, the European Political Community isn't even really a 'body'; it has no structures of its own, and is explicitly designed around the European Union. CMD (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis Under your suggestion, SCO should be removed from ((Supranational Asian Bodies)) as that bloc will have at least one purely-Europe country, isn't that? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is more that Template:Supranational Asian Bodies is a pile of WP:SYNTH, unlike this one where at least most of the groups are related. CMD (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis And how this isn't SYNTH?! In my opinion we should consider using British–Irish Council instead of CTA for UK-Ireland circle. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that particular case, the CTA is similar to Schengen, and the impact of one on the other is the topic of some research [1][2]. CMD (talk) 04:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three Seas Initiative also known as Baltic, Adriatic, Black Sea (BABS) Initiative the group that contains Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Doremon764 (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Romania and Bulgaria is now in Schengen on October 2023. New Welaeonska (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They were scheduled to join in October but it hasn't actually happened yet, and likely won't before the end of the year. See the Bulgaria and Romania section of Schengen Area for up-to-date status. Austin Harper 19:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As of March 31st 2024, Romania and Bulgaria are now in Schengen with regard to air and sea borders. I'm unsure how to indicate this on the diagram, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaxtrope (talk • contribs) 09:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about in the same way Croatia is dotted-lined into EEA? 2A02:169:BB:1:B62E:99FF:FEF2:F23B (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! That would be a fine way to do it. Gaxtrope (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucharest_Nine is formed by the countries of the Baltic assembly plus Visegrád group plus Romania and Bulgaria. Does any of you reading that knows how to add a line around those countries on the Euler diagram? 130.238.112.129 (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]