Football Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Due to euro 2020 regulations, groups are expected to be named 1-10 rather than by letters a-j Mijo34 (talk) 19:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Need add 1 draw for KAZ in overall table. 147.30.28.188 (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Danski454 (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Estonia may qualify to playoffs if these teams qualify directly: Group A: best of Bulgaria/Montenegro Group B: Serbia Group E: Hungary Group F: Israel Group G: Romania and Norway Group H: Albania Group I: best of Scotland/Cyprus Group J: best of Finland/Greece

So Estonia should receive status Y And Lithuania should receive status Z, because at least 4 teams from league C, except for Lithuania fail to qualify directly: Group A: worst of Bulgaria/Montenegro Group C: Estonia Group I: worst of Scotland/Cyprus Group J: worst of Finland/Greece 2A00:1370:8114:23C6:D9A4:D899:4692:9A4F (talk) 08:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Israel in Group G? 42.62.207.8 (talk) 11:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We arrived at pretty much the same time, so done. Piriprimey (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had to remove the Z from Lithuania because 19 teams between League B/C could qualify directly. Stigni (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible for two of Czech Republic, Montenegro and Bulgaria to qualify from Group A, and Estonia cannot qualify from Group C, so at most 18 can qualify. --Theurgist (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't Slovenia also not be able to secure playoffs either, since only one of them or Israel can qualify out of Group G? Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JalenFolf: In fact Slovenia was discussed at length in Talk:UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs. It is still possible that a sufficient number of teams from Leagues B and C that are ranked above Slovenia (second-to-last in League C) will qualify directly, so it can be in the play-offs. On the other hand, Lithuania (last in League C) cannot. --Theurgist (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to propose the following addition to the group tables: The teams that already secured the play-off spot (status letter (A) - as per 10 October Belarus and Scotland) could get the blue colour background like in the play-offs tables in the part of the page below or the Europa League spots in other association football league tables. In this case you could see it much quicker which teams are in the play-offs: There are so many status letters, that it's sometimes complicated to find the A... Lemkovic (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemkovic: I think adding the blue background would add unnecessary confusion due to its random appearance. Given the group standings do not determine the play-off participants, it is better left to be shown at UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs#Teams selected. S.A. Julio (talk) 07:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]