This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
@ZLEA:, what's your source for this? I read an off-wiki article this month that asserts it's a trainer designation, as the TF was originally envisioned as a trainer for the S2F, and never redesignated. I can't remember where at the moment, but I'll search my browser history later. BilCat (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Interesting. I remember seeing TF being listed as a "Transport" designation by one source, but I don't remember where I saw it. It would make more sense as a trainer designation, though. - ZLEAT\C 23:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"T" was clearly used for "trainer" by the Navy during the fifties, so you should probably revert back for now. If I find the source on the TF, I'll add it to the C-1 article. BilCat (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I found a print source that states its a trainer designation. It's Aircraft Carriers by Chris Bishop and Chris Chant (2004), p. 168. I'll add that to the C-1 article now. BilCat (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
