This template is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support, but why the RM? Simple case fixes in line with clear consensus do not need to be discussed. Dicklyon (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Speedy support. This should now be completely uncontroversial for the plural form, following the RM at Talk:List of presidents of the United States, and similar recent RMs. I've been moving a lot of "List of Presidents" and "List of Prime Ministers" and "List of Chairmen" and "List of Emperors" and other similar articles and templates myself since then and haven't gotten any push-back. Just do it. I would close this discussion myself, but I might be considered too involved. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
