• User:Ballista/images/OUMNH previous images from Oxford University Museum of Natural History
• User:Ballista/images/Charmouth Heritage Coast Centre June 2006
• User:Ballista/images/Natural History Museum, London Uploaded images from the Natural History Museum, London - July 2006
• Third trip to Oxford University Museum of Natural History User:Ballista/images/OUMNH3

Any images that have found a 'home' in their relvant articles are shrunk so as to allow concenratioin on the remainder of images. (N.B.: Firsfron was going to edit one or two that may already have been uploaded & now shrunk) - Ballista 21:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

WARNING: - these photographs (originally labelled 'Velociraptor) refer to Bambiraptor.

Comments:

Comments:

• This is the best of the new four. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Did I upload the wrong one? - see below) - Ballista 09:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Comments:

• Uploaded to article today - Ballista 19:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Hey, Firsfron - did I upload the wrong one? - the captions having slipped a bit may have confused me - Ballista 09:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Comments:

<>

Comments: The earlier one is better, I think. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• 

• No article to which to upload - unless we add to Plesiosaur? - Ballista 21:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Great shot. Definitely should go up. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Another good one. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Likewise. no article to which to upload - unless we add to Plesiosaur? - Ballista 21:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The Plesiosaur article only has two pictures, three counting the Loch Ness photo. --Firsfron of Ronchester 23:08, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Needs text removal, an easy edit. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• now uploaded to article (needs layout expertise over there!) with the others but we can swap when you've edited - Ballista 18:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Uploaded to article today - Ballista 11:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Uploaded to article today - Ballista 11:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Looks cool. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Uploaded to article today - Ballista 11:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC) You got a dodo! :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: I like this shot a lot. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Earlier shot (from side) better.--Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: I like it. It's better than the one on the other page, IMO. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Uploaded y'day, to Ichthyosaurus article - Ballista 09:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Earlier shot on other page is clearer. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Awaiting decision before uploading - Ballista 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Gets my vote. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Uploaded to article today - Ballista 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: If there is still room for this on the page, go for it. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

cool, good for playing with on Iguanodon page Cas Liber 08:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Uploaded to article today - Ballista 19:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: If there's still room on the page, this should go up. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Earlier one, showing entire trackway, is more illustrative, IMO. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Yes! Much brighter! :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Needs a bit of glare removed. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Absolute must! --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Again, a definite must. :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:One of the many WWD dittos. --Sneaky Oviraptor18^{talk edits tribute} 21:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments:

• Really cool edit done by Firsfron, at User:Ballista/images/OUMNH
• The wonderful edited version was uploaded - Ballista 09:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Earlier one from other page is better. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Either this one, or the very first shot of this one, is the best. I can't make up my mind.--Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Uploaded to article day b4 y'day - Ballista 09:14, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• WWD Ditto. Look at WWD factfiles for these dinos. FAMILIAR? -Sneaky Oviraptor18^{talk edits tribute} 21:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments:

Comments:

Comments: May need an edit, but this is an excellent shot. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Uploaded to article: There I go again, saying one thing and doing another - I had said I would await editing but this one shot down the plughole, as I was on the T. rex page. If you edit, we'll need to sub it. Sorry - Ballista 19:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

Comments:

• Ideal. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Uploaded to article today - Ballista 21:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• If both can be used, that would be good. If there's only room for one, then the one above should go on the page.--Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Uploaded to article today - Ballista 21:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: clearer shot than previous batch - T.rex walking off to extinction! - Ballista 12:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Nice shot of tail. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: all 'in' except legs - Ballista 12:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC) I prefer the earlier picture, personally. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• includes people for scale but 'lost' end of tail - Ballista 12:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• uploaded to article today - Ballista 13:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Need to decide if this should be subbed. - Ballista 21:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Less reflection etc - used flash - any better for editing? - Ballista 12:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Yes, better for editing. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Firsfron - do you want to 'play' with this one, b4 we think of uploading the earlier (darker) image-with-edit? - Ballista 09:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• Uploaded to article today - Ballista 13:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• I'm surprised this one went up, given Dinoguy's objections about the accuracy of the model. --Firsfron of Ronchester 14:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah, well, could be short-lived, I suppose? What do you reckon, Dinoguy? - Ballista 16:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments: