Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
(I chose this article to evaluate becasue it is talking about a differing view from Western society feminism which I believe often overshadows the rest of the world. I believe it matters because it gives a voice to those who have been oppressed for so long and offers a dive into what feminism is and how it works in different parts of the world. My first impressions are that it gets its point across well and provides sufficient information about the topic at hand. )
The article begins with a strong lead sentence that concisely describes what Post colonialism Feminism is. While the article does not provide a brief description of the big topics it will be covering, it gives an extensive background of the topic which is important information in understanding Postcolonial feminism. Overall the lead is precise and gets the information to the reader in an efficient manner. The sarticle is up to date and frequently being kept up with as the last edit made to the article was in September 18, 2023. The content overall is understandable and directly connects to the topic at hand. There seems to be no missing information as they have a detailed section filled with relevance to western feminism, how their relationships have been affected, etc. The sources on the article are a bit old with the most recent article sited being 2014. Their is only one image shown on the article and it is the logo for feminism but this does not add or take away from the article. Overall the article is solid. It touches on a range of topics surrounding Postcolonial feminism such as the history of its origins, its relationships to Western society and the conflicts that have arisen, as well as the influence of race and religion. — ~~~~