Cinadon36

I was wikiborn in September 2016. I consider myself a Dragon but there are no studies or expert views classifying me at Wikipedia's Fauna.

Wikipedians harvesting information and opinions from reliable sources. One of them might be Cinadon36. Painting by Camille Pissarro

My editing philosophy

Rule number one: Enjoy the process. Secondly, fulfill my own desire to acquire new knowledge. Editing Wikipedia, whether it involves adding or removing content, can run in parallel with my personal learning journey. My goal is to explore the "hows" and "whys" associated with each subject, summarizing the most prominent viewpoints and answers. Through this approach, I aim to convey the enthusiasm I have for various topics to the reader. While facts are crucial, it's equally important to discern them from trivial details.

Wikipedia is editing us

I believe that Wikipedia is shaping its contributors. I've noticed that I often find myself using Wikipedia-style reasoning in my everyday conversations. For instance, phrases like "Come on, this doesn't meet the criteria for a reliable source," or "Hey, you seem to be giving too much attention to this fringe theory" have become common in my language. Additionally, I've become more attuned to spotting logical fallacies. It's somewhat inevitable that every interaction we engage in has a subtle impact on us, but it seems that Wikipedia might have a more significant influence than we normally assume.

Conflict of Interest Declaration

I declare that I belong to the human species. I receive(d) food, education and money from humans (hopefully, this will continue). Apart from that, no other Conflict of interest.

Articles worked upon extensively (dragoned)

Here is a pageview analysis of them all.[1]

To do list

Postmodernism (gathering sources. Do you have any suggestions? Tell me!)

Awards and Barns

	The Three-Quarter Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Albert Camus (estimated annual readership: 880,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Three-Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

	The Half Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Ad hominem (estimated annual readership: 670,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		You have been a breath of fresh air to Balkan topics and may change my views on some things. Keep it up :) Resnjari (talk) 08:19, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

		The Purple Barnstar
		For your perseverance and poise to be cool, calm and collected against great odds. Keep up the good work! Resnjari (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nicely done with your edits of History of anarchism and Anarchism in Greece! Absolutely night and day differences from their former versions czar 01:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)