A mysterious user that likes sci-fi/fantasy-books and helping to create easily read articles, and dispute resolution (particularly at the DR Noticeboard), as well as a blooming interest in NPOV and prodding older editors out of their stupors to fix citations and tags.

I mainly deal with copy-editing; but I also help to clear up issues with in-universe details if I have seen the book/series or to help explain in-universe details using real-world resources. I also try to help edit pages into more structured and/or less-biased articles or to solve disputes between editors.

Have a look at my user space, and feel free to edit any of them.

Note

I am finding myself, when editing, to be a slight bit pedantic with application of policy and guideline, though I promise, I am trying to improve Wikipedia and not trample too many toes and policies.

If you want to give me some cake for my birthday, and you should, it's December 30, so feel free to gift me and I'll try to return the favour without stalking you.
This user's birthday is on December 30^th.

If you are looking for some "abrasive humour", check out EEng's user page.

My response to WP:PERSONAL attacks

Or you can use these in your battles with other users.^{Found on @EEng:'s page, created by @RexxS:}

Don't call names, you weedy toad-spotted clack-dish!

You have been noticed using opprobrious epithets. It's payback time from the Shakespeare Insult Generator! To receive fresh insults, click here. Note that all insults generated by the Spout are guaranteed to be literary and cultured, unlike the nasty things you said, you beslubbering plume-plucked fustilarian.

List of useful WikiPolicies, WikiGuidelines, WikiTemplates, etc.

Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?)

Five pillars
- Ignore all rules

Content (?)

P	Verifiability No original research Neutral point of view What Wikipedia is not Biographies of living persons Copyright (Copyright violations) Image use Article titles
G	Notability Autobiography Citing sources Reliable sources Medicine Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources Plagiarism Don't create hoaxes Fringe theories Patent nonsense External links

Conduct (?)

P	Civility Consensus Harassment Vandalism Ignore all rules No personal attacks Ownership of content Edit warring Dispute resolution Sockpuppetry No legal threats Child protection Paid-contribution disclosure
G	Assume good faith Conflict of interest Disruptive editing Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Etiquette Gaming the system Please do not bite the newcomers Courtesy vanishing Responding to threats of harm Talk page guidelines Signatures

Deletion (?)

P	Deletion policy Proposed deletion Biographies Criteria for speedy deletion Attack page Oversight Revision deletion

Enforcement (?)

P	Administrators Banning Blocking Page protection

Editing (?)

P

Editing policy

G

Article size Summary style Be bold Disambiguation Hatnotes Broad-concept article Understandability
Style	Manual of Style Contents Accessibility Dates and numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists
Classification	Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Template namespace

Project content (?)

G	Project namespace WikiProjects User pages User boxes Shortcuts Subpages

WMF (?)

P	Terms of Use List of policies Friendly space policy Licensing and copyright Privacy policy

List of all policies and guidelines
- P: List of policies
- G: List of guidelines
Summaries of values and principles

Wikipedia essays (?)

Essays on building, editing, and deleting content

Philosophy	Article content Articles must be written All Five Pillars are equally important Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Civil POV pushing Cohesion Competence is required Concede lost arguments Dissent is not disloyalty Don't lie Don't search for objections Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country Editors will sometimes be wrong Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Here to build an encyclopedia Leave it to the experienced Levels of competence Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction The one question Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Process is important Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community Wikipedia is not RationalWiki
Article construction	100K featured articles Abandoned stubs Acronym overkill Adding images improves the encyclopedia Advanced article editing Advanced text formatting Akin's Laws of Article Writing Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test A navbox on every page An unfinished house is a real problem Articles have a half-life Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Blind men and an elephant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Build content to endure Cherrypicking Chesterton's fence Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books Citation overkill Citation underkill Common-style fallacy Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability Deprecated sources Dictionaries as sources Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Don't "teach the controversy" Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Formatting bilateral relations articles Formatting bilateral relations templates Fruit of the poisonous tree Give an article a chance How to write a featured article Identifying and using independent sources History sources Law sources Primary sources Science sources Style guides Tertiary sources Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats Inaccuracy Introduction to structurism Mine a source Merge Test Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a template Nothing is in stone Obtain peer review comments Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area Permastub Potential, not just current state Presentism Principle of Some Astonishment The problem with elegant variation Pro and con lists Printability Pruning article revisions Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Source your plot summaries Specialized-style fallacy Stub Makers Run an edit-a-thon Temporary versions of articles Tertiary-source fallacy There are no shortcuts to neutrality There is no deadline There is a deadline The deadline is now Try not to leave it a stub Understanding Wikipedia's content standards Walled garden What an article should not include Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia is not a reliable source Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Write the article first Writing better articles
Writing article content	Avoid thread mode Copyediting reception sections Coup Don't throw more litter onto the pile Gender-neutral language Myth vs fiction Proseline Use our own words We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles
Removing or deleting content	Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources! Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete or merge Delete the junk Deletion is not cleanup Does deletion help? Don't attack the nominator Don't confuse stub status with non-notability Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Follow the leader How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Identifying blatant advertising Identifying test edits Immunity Keep it concise Liar liar pants on fire Nothing Nothing is clear Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive Relist bias The Heymann Standard Unopposed AFD discussion Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole Why was the page I created deleted? What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork No Encyclopedic Use

Essays on civility

The basics	Accepting other users Apology Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Edit at your own pace Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors Please say please Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives We are all Wikipedians here You have a right to remain silent
Philosophy	A weak personal attack is still wrong Advice for hotheads An uncivil environment is a poor environment Be the glue Beware of the tigers! Civility warnings Deletion as revenge Failure Forgive and forget It's not the end of the world Nobody cares Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals Old-fashioned Wikipedian values Profanity, civility, and discussions Revert notification opt-out Shadowless Fists of Death! Staying cool when the editing gets hot The grey zone The last word There is no Divine Right of Editors Most ideas are bad Nothing is clear Reader The rules of polite discourse There is no common sense Two wrongs don't make a right Wikipedia clichés Wikipedia is not about winning Wikipedia should not be a monopoly Writing for the opponent
Dos	Assume good faith Assume the assumption of good faith Assume no clue Avoid personal remarks Avoid the word "vandal" Be excellent to one another Beyond civility Call a spade a spade Candor Deny recognition Desist Discussing cruft Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Encourage full discussions Get over it How to lose Imagine others complexly Just drop it Keep it concise Keep it down to earth Mind your own business Say "MOBY" Mutual withdrawal Read before commenting Settle the process first
Don'ts	ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI Civil POV pushing Cyberbullying Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack Don't be a fanatic Don't be a jerk Don't be an ostrich Don't be ashamed Don't be a WikiBigot Don't be high-maintenance Don't be inconsiderate Don't be obnoxious Don't be prejudiced Don't be rude Don't be the Fun Police Don't bludgeon the process Don't call a spade a spade Don't call people by their real name Don't call the kettle black Don't call things cruft Don't come down like a ton of bricks Don't cry COI Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid Don't eat the troll's food Don't fight fire with fire Don't give a fuck Don't help too much Don't ignore community consensus Don't knit beside the guillotine Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature Don't remind others of past misdeeds Don't shout Don't spite your face Don't take the bait Don't template the regulars Don't throw your toys out of the pram Do not insult the vandals Griefing Nationalist editing No angry mastodons just madmen No Nazis No racists No Confederates No, you can't have a pony Passive aggression Please don't bite the newcomers POV railroad Superhatting There are no oracles There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns You can't squeeze blood from a turnip UPPERCASE
WikiRelations	WikiBullying WikiCrime WikiHarassment WikiHate WikiLawyering WikiLove WikiPeace

Essays on notability

Humorous essays

About essays

About essays	Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay
Policies and guidelines	About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Policy writing is hard

Template:Citation needed#Inline templates = Contains list of in-line tags and messages produced for both article, section and content tags.

Template:Unreferenced#Usage = Contains template for Articles and Sections that do not have referencing, at all.

Template:Refimprove#Usage = Contains template for Articles and Sections that have little or poor referencing.

Template:Done/See_also = Contains a list of visual templates for use on talkpages, discussions and mediation.

Template:Resolved/See_also = Contains a list of visual templates for use on WikiProjects, discussions and mediation.

Template:Table_cell_templates/doc = Contains a list of templates for use on WikiTables, mainly visual effects

Wikipedia:List_of_discussion_templates = Contains a list of templates for use in discussions

Help:Table = For all things "Wikitabling" related

/DRN Templates = For all things "WP:DRN"-related

Thank you for looking at my Page =)

I highly appreciate any and all well-wishes on my talk-page, and I will respond to all messages that do not violate WP:LAWYERING, WP:OUTING or WP:HARASS, even if being accused/suspected of being a sock-puppet/meat-puppet, or associated with such accounts. I do not have any sock-accounts or meat-puppets, nor am I a sock or meat-puppet, despite possibly acting that way.

Groups and Tags, Projects, Bots and Boxes

Yeah, I get carried away sometimes. #NotSorry

Wiki-things

This user is a participant in
WikiProject LGBT studies.

Talk | To do | Alerts | Watchlist

This user assists at the dispute resolution noticeboard.

SB

This user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit weekly.

Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "#".

This user has Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "#". centijimbos.

UserTags (Fiction-related and Fandom-related)

This user is alive!

This user reads science fiction.

Star
Trek

This user is just glad that the new Star Trek film is set in an alternate timeline.

BOTH

This user likes both Star Trek and Star Wars and is frustrated when told that's not allowed.

This user enjoys reading hard science fiction

This user is interested in the belief that there is no light or dark side of the Force, but only a single Unifying Force.

This user has been assimilated. Resistance is futile.

DIST • 13 •

This user is a resident of
District Thirteen.

This user enjoys reading alternate history fiction.

OSC

This user enjoys the works of Orson Scott Card.

13

This user smells fudge.

This user loves writing, but can hardly find the time to do so.

This user is a Doctor Who fan.

CSL

This user enjoys the works of
C.S. Lewis.

OUAT

This user knows that magic always comes with a price.

This user knows who the true Father of Science Fiction is.

V	This user knows Ideas are bulletproof!

This user knows that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

No one can be told how underrated the Matrix sequels are. You have to see them for yourself.

This user sees you.

This user lives by the Pirate code: “Take what you can, and give nothing back!”

This user enjoys the works of George Orwell.

NEW
LIFE

This user needs and wishes he had a life.

Everything Is Connected.

This user watches Fringe.

UserTags (Misc.)

UserTags (WikiEditting type)

This user supports heterosexual and homosexual marriages. Against gay marriage? Don't get one. Problem solved.

This user is a WikiPlatypus.

fuck

this user is quickly running out of fucks to give

This user is a WikiMercenary.

AU-5

This user believes that Australian English is the only real English, and will likely respond to any use of The Queen's or American English with disgust.

This user is a WikiWolfcub.

This editor believes in less bull and more writing.

iGen

This user is a member of the iGeneration

Barnstars

Barnstars
-- feel free to add to this list! Cheers to all, Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For your table of sources concerning the March 3/4 controversy. Kraxler (talk) 23:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		This barnstar is awarded to Drcrazy102 for kind, thoughtful, prompt, and unsolicited resolution of what otherwise might have been an on-going matter of contention and discord. Wikiant (talk) 13:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Excellent copyediting work at the bicycle kick article. Thank you for taking the time to conduct a meticulous improvement of the prose.-- MarshalN20 ^Talk 04:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

	Bright Idea Barnstar
	The For your idea to train specialist admins for specific functions. (If that wasn't actually your idea, then let this be a Barnstar for sharing it where it was very much needed on the Village Pump Policy page.) I would LOVE to see that implemented! Dcs002 (talk) 18:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

	A cup of coffee
	Thanks for the administrative wiki work you do. It smooths over difficulties and makes for pleasant wiki time. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
	I officially accept if this is a caramel, strong chocolate, takeaway, skim mocha. Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum

"Live" user stats

Account Statistics

10Y

This Wikipedian joined Wikipedia on May 29, 2013 (10 years, 9 months and 6 days ago).

but

Drcrazy102 has been active on Wikipedia for 9 years, 1 month and 6 days.

Sign-off

Doctor Crazy in Room 102 of The Mental Asylum 01:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Committed Identity Mother-Lovers! Committed identity: 296fd00312379f14b17e5cded21d425b55bd272b40bb9184907cc30e1d143dde7878af00a17d17d6cbdbfe77278e38f1ae1a2c18c42c26845d3a9f8997dbd872 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.