- Autism assessment
Assessment criteria
[edit]Assessment of autism spectrum-related articles:
- Importance
- Top = Core article or primary definition; central autism concept/person or necessary for basic coverage of the topic (e.g.; autism spectrum disorder, Hans Asperger)
- High = Core daughter article (per WP:MEDMOS sections) or significant related definition/person, hard to write the article comprehensively and NPOV without this article, enjoys widespread notability and consensus (e.g.; Causes of autism, Uta Frith)
- Mid = Daughter article or broad/basic definition, important for comprehensive coverage of the top issues, but not an integral definition or WP:MEDMOS component (e.g.; EQ SQ theory, Simon Baron-Cohen)
- Low = Non-core, the topic could be covered without this article
- Quality
- Has attained FA
- A-class or could attain with a bit of work
- GA-class or could attain GA with a bit of work
- B-equivalent, mostly cited and accurate, but has some issues, could be citations, OR, POV, or incomprehensive. Not too much work needed to bring to decent standard, but may still be a stub or start.
- Some cleanup/work needed, below B-class, has some issues like lack of citations, OR, POV, incomprehensive. Sustained attention needed to bring to standard.
- More work needed, multiple issues such as uncited, essay, POV, dubious accuracy or questionable notability. Lots of attention needed.
Autism
articles |
Importance
|
| Top |
High |
Mid |
Low
|
| Quality
|
| FA
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
almost
ready for A
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
almost
ready for GA
|
I
|
J
|
K
|
L
|
| B-equiv.
|
M
|
N
|
O
|
P
|
Some
cleanup
needed
|
Q
|
R
|
S
|
T
|
| More work
needed:
Uncited,
essay,
notability,
or POV
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
Templates, categories, and portals
[edit]