Some people try to superimpose their twisted ethics on the whole Wikipedia project. This is to document such cases of extreme hypocricy.

Beacons of ethicism

• User:Tony Sidaway: Ethics, matey.

Beacons of ethicism commenting on the article about murdered 9 year old girl

• this article is dead. Very funny, Mr. Sidaway.
• this article must die, says User:Nick.

Alison Stokke

The article about one of the most talented athletes in the country is deleted because she is... too sexy???

• Being attracted to the members of the opposite gender is apparently considered a perversion by the more ethical of the Wikipedians. User:Neil seems to be the most prudish, using the pervert argument 2 times: [1] [2]
• User:Krimpet goes for pervert argument too, and later attempts to speedily close the nomination... Is that ethical? [3] [4]
• This comment by User:Doc glasgow is so weird that I don't even know how to interpret it. But perhaps, it'll give a little more insight into the mind of one of the most ethical member of Wikipedia community.

Meanwhile, these users have made Wikipedia a laughing stock of the Internet. Are you happy now?  Grue  08:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)