This is but an archive. Please add new comments in new sections on my Talk page. Thanks in advance. Halibutt |
---|
((Shortcut|WP:WNBP))
zapraszam.--Witkacy 13:19, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zivinbudas has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zivinbudas/Evidence. Thank you. -- sannse (talk) 10:02, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Halibutt, once you have mentioned having some pics related to History of the Jews in Poland. Since the article is developing quite nicely, some pics would be appreciated. --Ttyre 21:00, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please take a look at Monastic State of the Teutonic Knights and feel free to change the maps your way. You know! Thanks. Space Cadet 23:03, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Since I noticed your interested in military medals, I wanted to let you know I created a Wikiportal about it. Located at User:Zscout370/ODM Portal, it is coordinate all users on articles associated with Orders, Decorations and Medals (OMD). All nations medals can be discussed. It mainly just has a listing of OMD articles on Peer Review, Featured articled candidates and those who becamed featured. Of course, I can add a listing for stub articles, request for pictures, requests for comments, and of course, votes for deletion (which should be rare). If you have any questions, just let me know. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 29 June 2005 02:18 (UTC)
Hey. I created their article at Polish Committee of National Liberation. I welcome your input, since my knowledge about this article is zero. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 29 June 2005 23:18 (UTC)
Zagłosowałeś dwa razy - lepiej popraw zanim ktos zrobi awanturę. I dalej czekam na twoj komentarz na Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/History_of_Poland_(1945-1989) - support, object, czy co uwazasz za sluszne. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 30 June 2005 12:36 (UTC)
Hi Halibutt, could you please look at contributions by anon user [2]. He spread several Polish names around into several articles in what I see an attempt to make a point or smth. Anyway, instead of myself choosing what to revert using my own judgement, could you please look at it first and revert or correct in whatever way that seems to make sense. Thanks! -Irpen June 30, 2005 20:06 (UTC)
Witaj, w dyskusji zadales pytanie: How to incorporate all of those into the article? :)
Mozna na przyklad przerzucic na Commons (chociaz nie wiem czy wszystkie sie da, po te z licencja ((PolandGov)) chyba nie>), utworzyc tam artykul-galerie ze zdjeciami dotyczacymi Powstania, a tu (i w innych wikipediach) dac w artykule link do galerii. Pozdrawiam Meteor2017 3 July 2005 17:29 (UTC)
W jęz. angielskim liczba mnoga od census to chyba nie jest censae, ale nie mam pod ręką współczesnego słownika. --Lysy (talk) 3 July 2005 18:24 (UTC)
You tagged this image for speedy deletion. Unfortunely, because of how Template:Infobox Warsaw is currently coded, I am going to have to delete Image:Warszawa Ursynów.png instead. The template uses the parameter no_diacrite to render both the map and the coat of arms. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 3 July 2005 19:15 (UTC)
I hate to admit it, you little fascist/ communist/ racist/ anti-semite/ biased person/ revisionist/ philo-Semite/ Semite/ anti-Semite/ trouble user/ uncivilised barbarian/ nationalist/ placename fetishist/ German revisionist / Polish pan/ Ukrainian nationalist / Polish Nazi/ Slavic monkey/ native of Lower Dneper/ stupid slave/ Polish fascist/ chauvinist/ falsificator (sic!)/ slave / dumb Polak / Jew / Slav / Sclavonian /ape-man / salamander/ fish, but you have a point. I changed my vote at Talk:Wojsko Polskie. --Jpbrenna 4 July 2005 21:50 (UTC)
Rzuć okiem na stikery. Space Cadet 5 July 2005 03:15 (UTC)
hi halibutt, i am confused, where am i supposed to vote in the discussion board on Wolsko Polskie? there are so many comments and i am slightly confused... or am i just supposed to add to the discussion? i am all about originality, so i think the polish name is fine Antares911 5 July 2005 12:24 (UTC)
hi halibutt, i am confused, where am i supposed to vote in the discussion board on Wolsko Polskie? there are so many comments and i am slightly confused... or am i just supposed to add to the discussion? i am all about originality, so i think the polish name is fine Antares911 5 July 2005 12:30 (UTC)
<begin cliché-filled text> Exercitus Polonus would have been the far better choice. For properly classicizing military propaganda, see Francis Glass, Washingtonii Vita J.N. Reynolds, Ed. CAPUT NONUM:
Polish Latin must have been tainted by the vulgar idiom of those Dacian hordes dwelling beyond the Carpathians, who say Armata polonă Well, all I have to say is "Daci non supra grammaticos!"
Let me know when the dust settles on the Polish Army naming issue and I'll start a Latin Wikipedia stub based on whichever name finally prevails. I see you've been mustering your troops on the discussion page to march to the sound of the guns. Well, good luck and Godspeed! Be BOLD in your edits! L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace! Vae victis! Gott mit uns! </end cliché-filled text> --Jpbrenna 6 July 2005 02:44 (UTC)
Surely "Jewish German history" is the history of German Jews? Not the history of what the Germans did to Polish Jews? Adam 8 July 2005 06:19 (UTC)
I uploaded some pictures of Prokudin-Gorsky in English Wiki. As you formerly added such pictures to Commons, I think you would be interested to add these as well. The images are as follows: Image:Prokudin solovki2.jpg Image:Kem prokudin.jpg Image:Vytegra.jpg Image:Vladikaukaz.jpg Image:Ufa prokudin.jpg Image:Gagry.jpg Image:Staritsa.jpg Image:Vladimir demetrios.jpg Image:Vladimir assumption.jpg Image:Ladoga1911.jpg Image:Belozersk09.jpg Image:Prokudin still life.jpg Image:Lugano prokudin.jpg --Ghirlandajo 10:07, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Seriously — I think that "Armed Forces of Poland" was the worst possible choice! It is a sad day for Wikipedia.
We must, however, move on. What should the Latin article be called? You said that the Polish Army was called the "Armata Polona" in the interwar period, at least on recruiting posters. I said exercitus was better, but of course, if we are talking about the combined-arms service, then armata is the better choice; either it is a substantive npl adjective "Armed Poland" or, interpreting it as the Greek npl αρμάτα "Polish Arms." Both fit the Polish system better than "exercitus," which would just be the Land Forces. So, I'm off to create a stipula. Look for it in the "other languages" tab. --Jpbrenna 21:42, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Be bold, but don't be reckless. Sashazlv 18:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
To zdjęcie z całą pewnością przedstawia HArcerski z ZHR a nie z ZHP - charakterystyczną cechą jest białoczerwona plakietka nad prawą kieszenią munduru, podobne nosili też w ZHP-1918, ale od kilku lat są wszyscy razem w ZHR. Dlatego należałoby to poprawić, czyli przenieść zdjęcie z ZHP do ZHR. Jka bys potrzebował jeszcze jakieś zdjęcia o tematyce harcerskiej służe pomocą :) Pisz na stronie dyskusji polskiej bo na angielską nie zagladam często. Szumyk 08:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
A decision has been reached in the arbitration case relating to Zivinbudas. He has been banned from Wikipedia for one year. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zivinbudas#Final decision for further details and the full decision. -- sannse (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Co do kategorii harcerzy, mozna sie kierowac kategoria na pl wiki [3], i wstawiac tylko wybitnych instruktorow harcerskich jak i rowniez ludzi w ktorych zyciu harcerstwo odgralo duza role.--Witkacy 10:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
IPN o harcerzach --SylwiaS 16:31, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Co do uzywania przywilejow dla wlasnych potrzeb - sledze dyskusje na bordzie adminow, 3rr, mailingliscie i od czasu do czasu rozne wojny edytowe... i powiem Ci ze osoby obsypane bernstarami jawnie uzywaja przywilejow do przepchniecia wlasnych pogladow.
Jestes tu juz starym wyjadaczem, napisales mase artykulow - idealny kandydat na admina :)
Co do Sylwii i Logologisty - owszem, ale narazie przez zbyt mala liczbe editow, te kandydatury by nie przeszly. Trzeba jeszcze poczekac :)
Co do glosowania na RfA - zdaje sobie z tego sprawe ze klub fanow polskich edytorow bedzie Ci wiele zarzucal (co oznacza ze zrobiles tu kawal dobrej roboty) ale wydaje mi sie rowniez, ze wiele osob by glosowalo pozytywnie. Co do sporow czy jestes bardziej Polakiem, Zydem, polskim nacjonalista, rusofobem - psy szczekaja karawana jedzie dalej. Zastanow sie jeszcze ;)--Witkacy 11:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Hello Halibutt! In case you are interested, there is currently a survey at Talk:Harghita/Vote regarding whether or not Hungarian names should be included in articles for Romanian places. Your input would be valued if you'd like to talk a look. Olessi 16:25, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Wiesz, ze masz dwa? :D User:Halibutt/Black Book i User:Halibutt/Black book. Moze by je zmerdzowac? Jimbo ma tez dobry pomysl z ta strona edukacji. Ew. oficjalnie odsunac to do lamusa. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
The "black book" was legitimately deleted via VfD, at which time it was moved by Nohat to your user space at User:Halibutt/Black Book. After it was moved to your user space, several admins going as high as User:Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia itself, registered their disapproval of the entire idea, if your memory fails you, please review User talk:Halibutt/Black Book. Thereafter, the entire disgusting thing was copied over to User:Halibutt/Black book, a dispicable but sneaky way to remove the glaring eye of criticism while maintaining this little trollish trove of animosity for users who have fallen out of grace with Polish wikipedians. By all accounts, for what it's worth, it appears that the primary mastermind behind this whole grotesque miscarriage of civility is the unforgivable troll User:Witkacy, who seems to think that anything related to Poland is his personal domain, and that any wikipedian who even dares glance askance at his ludicrous ideas is guilty of "anti-Polonism". That diatribe aside, I see NO evidence whatsoever that you've attempted in any way whatsoever to have this trollishness removed from your userspace. I asked of you nearly 5 days ago why I was listed in this obscene "black book" and have YET to receive anything in the way of a response. If this repulsive and revolting miscarriage of the Wikipedian spirit you call a "black book" is meant to serve any "good" purpose, although with such an obscene name I fail to see how it could possibly do so, I DEMAND that you address my inquiry at User talk:Halibutt/Black book. If you have no explanation, then I DEMAND that you address how such an egregious charge could be levied against me in YOUR user space without so much as a whimper of protest from you. If you truly aren't aware that you were being used by that obscene troll Witkacy, I submit to you that you are either incompetent or a liar. In any case, I am EXTREMELY offended that my name has been befouled in your userspace and if you truly were unaware of the extent to which I was abused by the godforsaken troll Witkacy, you should at least offer me your humblest apologies. As I've said elsewhere, the grotesque denizen of the underside of bridges, the troll Witkacy has been reverted (see this edit), but the fact remains that you have done NOTHING to prevent your userspace from being used to besmirch my name for nearly a month. I am horribly appalled and grossly offended. Tomer TALK 11:55, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
Halibutt, the Black Book (two copies of it, at least) are in your User space. Consequently, you do have to take some responsibility for those pages. From the discussions above and elsewhere, it should be painfully obvious that the Black Book model does not help with dispute resolution—rather, it serves to further inflame. It is fully within your power to remove the names from the list or take down the page entirely—this is your User space. I don't really want to have to run through the flame wars and unpleasantness that were associated with retiring the Black Book the last time. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 14:31, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
I have posted notice of your 3RR violation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. Gene Nygaard 15:48, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
...mam nadzieję, że żartujesz z tym przenoszeniem?.. ;-) Pibwl ←« 19:44, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Widzę, że sarkazm przez Ciebie przemawia... Pibwl ←« 21:21, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
w czym oryginalna nazwa jest gorsza od tej, którą raczyłeś wymyślić?
- nie wymyśliłem, tylko przetłumaczyłem z zachowaniem oryginalnego dla polskiego sprzętu oznaczenia "wz.". Gorsza jest niestety w tym, że czytelnik anglojęzyczny połamie sobie na niej język, nawet jej zapewne poprawnie nie przepisze, a przede wszystkim nie będzi miał pojęcia o czym jest artykuł.
dlaczego polski sprzęt wojskowy jako jedyny ma być tłumaczony?
Nie jestem za tłumaczeniem nazw własnych i oznaczeń, tylko opisów. Poza tym wg mnie, dla jasności, np. "PzB 39" (o którym na razie nie ma artykułu) też miałby lepszy tytuł "anti-tank rifle PzB 39". Nie widzę innych przykładów nie tłumaczenia sprzętu, niż powszechnie przyjęte skróty (nie całe nazwy) niemieckie.
Dlaczego przeniosłeś artykuł poza procedurą
Sorry, istotnie nie wnikałem bliżej w procedury przenoszenia. Ale chyba musiałem uznać tłumaczenie nazwy za oczywiste na angielskiej wikipedii (zresztą, zrobiłem to chyba w miesiąc po próbie rozpoczęcia dyskusji na stronie artykułu). W każdym razie, teraz możemy to naprawić. Pibwl ←« 10:54, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Forgot to say it. --Ttyre 22:04, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
I want to find out more about one of the names on the Katyń Memorial Wall - he might be a relative. Are there any military records available on the executed, or are they sitting in a Russian vault somewhere? The Wikipedia article says: Despite earlier declarations, 116 out of 183 volumes of files gathered during the Russian investigation, as well as the decision to put an end to it, were classified. So I know what the answer will probably be, but I was just wondering if you know of any sources (even if they are written in that bourgeois capitalist patois known as "Polish"). --Jpbrenna 00:45, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Za obrazek. Nominujesz i podmienisz, gdzie trzeba? A ja na prawde myslalem, ze to mialo byc czerwone... ciekawe, skad sie wziela ta czerwona wersja? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:39, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi Halibutt, thanks for your well-intentioned edit regarding car thefts on Anti-Polonism. Reasonable edits are few and far between in the history of this article. Still, I decided to remove it; let me explain why. Although I am easily upset by anti-Polish stereotypes, and even wrote to the German foreign office once and asked them to remove overstated traveller warnings on crime in Poland, I can't discuss away the fact that a disproportionately high number of Poles were involved in organised car theft in Germany throughout the 1990s. Police statistics speak a clear language here. That German public opinion elevated "car thief" to being almost synonymous with "Pole" is regrettable. That's how stereotyping works, like it or not, and we should certainly work against such stereotyping wherever possible and necessary on within the scope of an encyclopedia. Having said that, we should also stick to facts, and not let political correctness go at the expense of factual correctness. No offence, --Thorsten1 19:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Cześć. Napisałem pare stubów o polskiej broni z września 1939 roku. Żeby ułatwić nawigację wstawiłem do wszystkich odpowiedni szablon. Po dwóch godzinach przyczołgał się do mnie Gene Nygaard i napisał że tytuły Kb wz.98a, Kbk wz.29 czy Ckm wz.30 są złe bo po polsku. Można go olać (ma uczulenie na język polski) czy naruszyłem jakąś regułe i trzeba poprzenosić (słabo znam angielski i w dyskusji z gościem jestem na straconej pozycji)? --Nemo5576 16:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Przeżyje :) Na en jestem tylko gościem, a na pl-Wiki na szczęście nikt mi nie bruździ ;) A jeśli chodzi o dyskusje na temat kb ppanc wz.35 to bardzo zajmująca lektura(z czytaniem tekstu angielskiego sobie radze, z pisaniem jest gorzej), na marginesie teraz na pl-Wiki jest pl:Karabin przeciwpancerny wz.35. --Nemo5576 17:23, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi, can I ask you where you got it? I started working on Lithuania rivers and thought I could use some maps. Besides, you got a warning there that you need to show copyrights there. Cheers! Renata3 05:48, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Wyszła mała wojna edycyjna :) No cóż lepiej znasz angielski więc pewnie masz racje. Ale pierwsze Hotchkissy w Polskiej Armii były orginalnymi Mle 14 i miały kaliber 8 x 50 mm R Lebel, dopiero wz.25 były 7,92. Tak na marginesie naprawde masz instrukcje do kb ppanc wz.35 ? --Nemo5576 08:29, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
I hear you've been named an "immature schizophrenic." I know it takes millions of hours on Wikipedia to reach that level, and it's good to see that your hard work has not gone unrewarded. As someone who is merely a puerile maniac at this point, it is good to have someone like you to look up to. (Sorry for ending that sentence with a preposition - I'm sure they taught you not to, but when you're a native speaker you're allowed to get away with such violations once-in-awhile).
So, anyway where are the pictures of your incredible girlfriend of whom I keep hearing so much? And does she have a sister? --Jpbrenna 07:20, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Ok, I should get to bed, but I have a few more questions:
Hi, I think we don't need that additional Enigma pic, particularly as it's non-free. See Talk:Enigma machine. — Matt Crypto 17:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
This is one of the Lechitic tribes whence the Poles get their name. On the other hand, the name of the tribe isn't exclusively Polish. --VKokielov 22:23, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Hello, There's an oddly named article Kgwinðbunt with an Icelandic letter in it. I tried to Google based on the names of the father and son mentioned in the article, and I came up with an article in Polish. I can read some Russian, so I can guess some what it says, but not fully understand it. If you have time, can you briefly take a look? I ask because you're active on Lithuanian/Polish historical issues. -- Curps 09:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
I see User:Naive cynic has already moved the article to Gimbut. I added that link to it as an external link, but decided not to add any additional text to the page itself. Thanks for your help. -- Curps 08:49, 24 August 2005 (UTC)