This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

Shortcut WP:SUCK

I'll say it right here, loudly and clearly: Wikipedia is going to suck sometimes.

The user who first registers at Wikipedia may fall in love with the idea behind it: a collaborative environment in which people work together to create an encyclopaedia much more comprehensive than Britannica. It's a great idea, in theory, and even in practice much of the time. But alas, nothing can work perfectly, and Wikipedia is a far cry from perfection. As users discover this, they become disillusioned and may give up editing. I myself once went through this, not ever leaving Wikipedia completely, but for a time doing nothing but countervandalism efforts: no encyclopedia editing, no edit warring blocks, none of my usual things. One thing I have discovered is that one must accept this fact from the beginning: Wikipedia is going to suck sometimes. Accepting that fact allowed me to finally move on with my Wikipedia career. We have to accept that:

• The article content is going to suck sometimes. The POV pushers are going to take control from time to time. The nationalists are going to turn articles into battlegrounds to represent their interests. The fringers are going to give their theories undue weight. As long as we have an open system, this is going to happen sometimes. We should do everything we can against it, but it will be a difficult and long struggle, and sometimes we won't be winning.
• The community is going to suck sometimes. People are going to be divided by ethnicity, nationality, ideology, religion and many more factors, and people are often going to emphasise their differences rather than their similarities. People are going to hold grudges against one another that create rifts in our community.
• The administration, broadly defined, is going to suck sometimes. Sysops are going to make terrible blocks and deletions. Bureaucrats are going to promote users who should not have been promoted, or not promote those who should have. The ArbCom is going to make decisions that you're sure even the military junta of Myanmar would never be so crazy as to make. All who perform administrative duties here are human, and are subject to mistakes. And sometimes their decisions are going to suck.

Someone will no doubt call Heimstern on being negative and cynical. Yes, I suppose I am. But I find it's necessary in this environment. We cannot survive as editors continually thinking all will be well here; the disappointment is too great. We must accept that Wikipedia is going to suck more often than we want it to. We must also rejoice in the good that exists here and pursue that to the best of our abilities.