Been reverted? Think I've made a mistake?

I patrol the recent changes for vandalism, in all its forms, to try to help keep Wikipedia the best that it can be, but like many users, I make mistakes.

• If you think I have made a mistake, please let me know on my talk page.
• Just because I revert an edit does not mean I sanction the existing contents.
• Just because I revert an edit does not mean I disagree with the motive behind the original edit (unless pure vandalism; hatred; trolling)
• If I revert it's only because I believe the edit was vandalism or not valid to the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia including being a neutral point of view and verifiable.

What I'm doing on Wikipedia

Articles

Major Contributions

Many of these were drafts that had been created as basic stubs that required filling out. Inclusion criteria > 40-50% edits & content when accepted/worked on.

Pointless meaningless statistics

This user is one of the 73 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

My Username

It's a very old name from over two decades ago, and a drunken nights gaming... it stuck and I was known by it online when I created this account in 2006. Maybe I should have started a new account when I actually started editing, but I never expected to do more than a couple of edits.... oh well.

• I was a Kylie fan and not someone called Kylie with a high regard for myself ;) so...
  • Kylie + Fantastic = KylieTastic