Discussion of the purpose of this list
|
---|
This list in Orlady's userspace is a list of articles edited by me, doncram, which she has identified in order to criticize them. Elkman, Station1, Ntsimp, Polaron, and Orlady have seen fit to revise some of these articles and mark some of them "done" here. I disagree in general with some of the criticism of these articles which has been expressed elsewhere, but I also agree that most of these articles, like most articles in Wikipedia, can indeed be improved. Some of the apparent focus has been upon removing statements that I believed to be accurate, but which were deliberately ambiguous, where more precise statements of fact were not possible to write. I definitely agree that replacing an ambiguous statement with a sourced statement of fact is an improvement. IMO, simply removing a sourced ambiguous statement is not necessarily an improvement. IMO, changing an ambiguous statement to a more confident but possibly false statement is not a help. If no one objects strenuously, i will give some specific comments about the articles as created or edited by me, and about subsequent changes to them. Hopefully this will help improve understanding of what my intentions were and will help improve the articles. --doncram 20:56, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
am 15:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments
|
---|
|
Doncram's comments, not aimed at resolving the problem
|
---|
|
Done by User:TheCatalyst31 --Orlady (talk) 02:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Based on a search for "has other significance," 7 June 2011:
*James Hazelton House (duplicate)
These are based on a search for "designed and/or" on June 13, 2011. I tried to avoid duplications and I did not include some articles that appeared otherwise to be in reasonably good shape.
Discussion
|
---|
|