There is no Cabal
This user is a member of the WikiProject Human Genetic History
This user contributes to the
Medical genetics task force
en-5This user can contribute with a professional level of English.
es-1Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.

Pages I am currently working on

Haplogroup R1a (Y-DNA) - Applied for GA status
Mitochondrial Eve -
HLA-DQ1 - Created
User:Pdeitiker/Arachidonate sensitivity - fetal
List of R1a frequency by population - Created
Serotype
Neanderthal genome project
Human Genetic History project

Portal:Molecular Anthropology

Intro
Selected article
Selected picture
Selected biography
WikiProject
Things_you_can_do
Molecular_Anthropology_news

Subpages

TEMP
Links

Immediate Goals

To bring all pages that are not stubs to class-B status in the Human genetic history project. When this is sufficiently done to elicit help sufficient to promote some to GA status.

B-class

The article meets the six B-Class criteria:

  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary.
  2. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
  3. The use of citation templates such as ((cite web)) is not required, but the use of <ref></ref> tags is encouraged. [Note: Thanks to the work of Andrew, I think we are going to move articles to the Harvard reference system with the ((Citation)) style]. I am working for producing a database of Harvard tags and citations in the WP:HGH page. Also Now that the Diberri tool is back on line, it would be nice to see those full citations again.
  4. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
  5. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  6. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  7. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously.
  1. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  2. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

This is on top of the standards for Class-C

C-class

A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style and related style guidelines.

The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.

The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.

Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.

Project Pages

These pages I am intensely working on to improve references, remove speculative material, add more secondary review sources, and wikify.

Past Project Pages

Pages Created (>150)

to Firefox, which saved a copy of the last uploaded page. After a first brutal week and alot of prejudice on the part of certain Admins, it did survive.

Pages that I am working on that need more work

Pages that I am working on that are approaching review stage

Pages that I am working on that need outside review