Welcome with WikiProject invite:
((subst:User:Piotrus/w|WikiProject))
Poland-project specific invite:
((subst:Portal:Poland/Welcome))
Invitation to DYK:
((subst:User:Piotrus/TDYK|article))
Request to use assessment templates:
((subst:User:Piotrus/AT|article))
Request to use reflinks: On Bare URLs I've noticed that your article [[]] uses [[Wikipedia:Bare URLs|bare URLs]] which are vulnerable to [[Wikipedia:Link rot|link rot]]. I've fixed it at [] using the [[Wikipedia:Reflinks]] tool. This tool together with [http://reftag.appspot.com/], can give you a quick and easy way to format almost all bare references in the article. I hope you'll try it out and format your references in the future! --~~~~
Good faith message to potential spammers
Frankly, whether one edits non-startup content or not is a good determinant, per WP:DUCK, whether one is a paid-for spammer or not. Food for thought. Take care,
((Annual readership))
Most common assessments:
living=yes
((WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low))((WikiProject Biographies|class=stub|living=yes))
((WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low))((WikiProject Biographies|class=start|living=yes))
living=no
((WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low))((WikiProject Biographies|class=stub|living=no))
((WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low))((WikiProject Biographies|class=start|living=no))
company
((WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low))((WikiProject Companies|class=stub|importance=low))
((WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low))((WikiProject Companies|class=start|importance=low))
other
((WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low))((WikiProject replaceme|class=stub|importance=low))
((WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low))((WikiProject replaceme|class=start|importance=low))
Speedy
((Db-a7))
Prods: endorse
((Proposed deletion endorsed|I concur with the nominator ))
bio
((notability|Biographies))((Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. ))
org
((notability|organizations))((Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. ))
soft
((notability|software))((Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. ))
fiction
((notability|fiction))((Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. ))
AfD
use ((subst:afdx|2nd)) for n-th nom
bio
((notability)) ((subst:afd))
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=B|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. " It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". )) ~~~~
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=B|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. " It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). )) ~~~~
org
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". As I discussed in my [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-08/Op-ed|Signpost Op-Ed]], this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam.)) ~~~~
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-08/Op-ed|Signpost Op-Ed]], this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam.)) ~~~~
soft
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". )) ~~~~
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). )) ~~~~
fict
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". )) ~~~~
((subst:afd2|pg=((subst:SUBPAGENAME))|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD).)) ~~~~
* '''Delete''' due to lack of [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in multiple [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent sources]] <small>([[WP:42|?]])</small> which in turn indicates problems with [[Wikipedia:Notability]].