Wikipedia[1] is the largest encyclopedia in history, and the world's most-visited wiki. Wikipedia is now part of the online zeitgeist, and educators must deal with it. This essay is for teachers who share the author's belief that Wikipedia (or, more properly, the underlying process of mass collaboration that created it) will loom large in the future careers of students, this is a good thing, and students need to be ready to exploit it.

Benefits

The author believes students should master wiki editing, because wikis allow large numbers of remote users to collaborate more efficiently than they can with traditional methods that involve repeatedly carting millions of information workers between their homes and physical offices each day. This will become increasingly important as the world careens closer to running out of petroleum. Plus wikis are just fun to edit, and they let you collaborate with a wider variety of people at distances too great to span by physical travel even if transportation were free.

Wikis fill an important and hitherto unfilled void between e-mail and formal documents. In most organizations, there is a need for a simple way to let everyone edit information with future value on Web pages. Unfortunately, most tools for creating formal documents (such as DocBook, FrameMaker, etc.) are too difficult for casual use, and aren't set up for collaborative editing anyway. At the other extreme, E-mail is great for throw-away information, but not for information that needs to persist, because e-mail creates a giant disorganized pile of rough drafts of decaying information. Wikis allow everyone in an organization to work together to build an explicit expression of the organization's structure of knowledge. This author believes that in the future, more and more people will grasp this as the whole point of having organizations.

Students must emerge from school fully prepared to participate in the wiki revolution.

What Wikipedia is and is not

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not many other things.

Perhaps most importantly for newcomers to Wikipedia, Wikipedia is unlike anything else which most people have seen before. The result is that almost everyone makes incorrect assumptions about Wikipedia at first. Two of the more common and catastrophic assumptions:

As easy as Wikipedia is to misunderstand, it is equally easy to edit, perhaps too easy, because Wikipedia's initially simple interface barely hints at Wikipedia's stupefying complexity. The result is that many new users have a rough start, as they unwittingly violate one policy or guideline after another, and see their contributions changed by others, or deleted outright.

Teacher, teach thyself

Before a person can teach a subject, that person must know the subject. Most people who know about Wikipedia (or wiki editing generally) learned what they know by editing on Wikipedia (or on other wikis).

A person who edits on Wikipedia learns by editing, by seeing what other editors do to his or her edits, and by reading the manuals. The more a person has edited, the more editing situations he or she will have run into, and hopefully learned from. Therefore, a user's edit count is a rough measure of the user's knowledge of Wikipedia. Roughly speaking, an edit count of 1,000 or more suggests an editor who has enough experience to be fairly competent - perhaps competent enough to teach others how to edit on Wikipedia.

Conversely: beginners in any subject are unlikely to make good teachers in that subject.

If you want to teach your students to edit well on wikis, the first step is to gain wiki editing experience of your own.

Fortunately, the people who designed Wikipedia designed it with self-training in mind. The vast majority of expert Wikipedia users never attended any formal class to teach them how to edit on Wikipedia. You can attain any level of Wikipedia expertise merely by reading the extensive and generally well-written online help. Also see the Editor's index to Wikipedia, and read the questions and replies on the Help desk each day. To build and test your knowledge of Wikipedia, try answering questions on the Help desk.

Also see the book: Wikipedia - The Missing Manual (the full text is available here: H:TMM).

Choosing the right wiki

Wikipedia is one of the best wikis on which to gain wiki expertise via self-instruction, because Wikipedia has:

Therefore, Wikipedia may be a suitable wiki to help a teacher learn enough about wiki editing to teach others. The best way to start, generally, is to edit existing articles, rather than try to create new articles right away. Creating new articles that stick requires fairly advanced skills (or in the case of the author's first article, some plain dumb luck).

However, Wikipedia might not be the best instructional platform for people who need a teacher, such as young students, or adult students who only take a casual approach to the subject. That's because Wikipedia is building a real encyclopedia, and thus one cannot easily march students through a fixed set of instructional scenarios. Wikipedia is a live system rather than a training system, and all participants metaphorically go straight into battle.

For example, on Wikipedia we cannot teach people to create new articles by re-creating articles which already exist; the only way to teach someone how to create a new article on Wikipedia is to actually create a new article, and this requires a substantial knowledge of how to research a topic from scratch and write about it to encyclopedic standards. Furthermore, most of the "good" topics already have articles (Wikipedia has 6,821,208 articles at the moment), and the remaining topics to write about are becoming increasingly obscure, hard to research, and often not notable enough to escape deletion.

Encouraging your students to edit on Wikipedia without proper training can be like throwing them to the wolves, as they unwittingly violate one policy or another and have their work deleted by people they don't know.

Therefore, you might consider using another wiki to teach introductory wiki editing to your students.

Existing wikis

See:

Possibly there is some other wiki more suitable than Wikipedia for the exploratory editing your students may want to do, or for their non-encyclopedic writing.

Your own school wiki

Many schools have started their own wikis. Check to see if your school already has one. If your school has its own wiki, that is almost certainly the best choice for students in a wiki beginner class. You can set up standard lesson plans that teach basic wiki editing skills, without having to think up new scenarios for every student.

If your school does not already have a school wiki, you might consider starting one so you can bring your students along gently in a wiki environment that you control.

Starting your own wiki requires the skills of a system administrator. If you don't have these skills yourself, talk to the person who runs the computer lab at your school. He or she should easily be able to set up a school wiki. However, be aware that administering your own wiki requires substantial ongoing labor. Consider recruiting student volunteers to help maintain your school wiki.

You may choose to make your school wiki readable or even writeable by the general public, or you may choose to run your wiki safely behind your school's firewall. You may choose to set up both public and private wikis for your school. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. Young students may need more protection from outsiders than adult students.

If you really want your students to edit on Wikipedia

It's possible that you have carefully examined other wikis, and you really do want your students to edit on Wikipedia. If so, then see: Wikipedia:School and university projects.

Getting help

There may be experienced Wikipedians in your locality willing to guest-lecture to your students.

To-do: research this and give links telling teachers how to find such people.

See also

Help desk replies

Several replies to questions on the Help desk are relevant to this essay.

To-do: look up more.

Notes

  1. ^ Without loss of generality, "Wikipedia" in this essay refers to the English Wikipedia. Teachers who instruct in other languages may find useful information here, but other language Wikipedias may have policies that differ from those on the English Wikipedia, and that may affect the choice of which wiki is most appropriate for a given application.