The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

ClueBot NG[edit]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Closed as successful by TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure). I realize I am not an admin nor a 'crat, but ClueBot threatened me + this isn't a real RfA and needs to be cleared out, so IAR! ClueBot wins! :D Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (?/?/?); Scheduled to end 00:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination[edit]

ClueBot NG (talk · contribs) – Hundreds of edits and a history of reverting vandalism. ^{[Username Needed]} 15:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC) Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: 01001001 00100000 01100001 01100011 01100011 01100101 01110000 01110100 ClueBot NG

Questions for the candidate[edit]

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: 01010010 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 01110100 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01010110 01100001 01101110 01100100 01100001 01101100 01101001 01110011 01101101 ClueBot NG

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: |01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 ClueBot NG

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: 01001110 01001111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 00111111 ClueBot NG

---

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Additional question from Green Giant

4. Are you prepared to publicly disclose what really happened to the original Cluebot? Did you permanently "retire" your sibling? Green Giant (talk) 21:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

A:

Discussion[edit]

• Links for ClueBot NG: ClueBot NG (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for ClueBot NG can be found here.

---

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Support[edit]

1. A good bot. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
2. ClueBot NG can't block vandals right now, but if he could, it would help immensely. HotdogPi 15:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

   You've seen to forgot the memo. Giving bots such inmense power will certainly spell the doom of mankind. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 16:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

3. Strongest possible support. Very helpful in reverting vandalism. —AnAwesomeArticleEditor ON WHEELS! ^AprilFools₂₀₁₈ (talk · contribs) 15:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
4. Support I see this coming... Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
5. Support Has clue. (I think.) Deb (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
6. Support more clue than anyone else I've seen. I mean, it radiates from this candidate to the point that you can practically see it in their name Sorry for the bad pun --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
7. PFFFFFFFFFFT. Okay, that was a good one. --TL22 (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

1. Oppose Can't get more SPA than ClueBot. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 15:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
2. oppose isnt this what elon musk warned about????😎HellaswagdabXD😎emoji😎^Talk 16:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
3. Oppose, insufficient edit count. ClueBot NG has only made 2,898,217 edits to english wikipedia, and we look for about 5,000,000 in a modern adminship candidate. Please try again in a year or so.Tazerdadog (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
4. Oppose What an ironic name. Lacks ability to answer questions. No money answer, no grovel support! — Javert2113 (talk) 17:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
5. Oppose - Editor doesn't have much CLUE. –Davey2010^Talk 20:28, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
6. Oppose - No experience with CSD, doesn't have enough CLUE. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Neutral[edit]

I Don't take AMEX anymore. Please swipe again. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 18:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

General comments[edit]

• There is so much vandalism on this RfA page that I cannot tell what we are !voting on. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• I got you now fishy! theHypn0toad 18:35, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Stop toadying up to me! --Tryptofish (talk) 18:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• He's not afraid! I cast summon bigger fish theHypn0toad 18:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Vandal! --Tryptofish (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

• Neil Armstrong loves frogs more than fishes. One giant leap for mankind! theHypn0toad 19:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.