This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:XtraJovial.

XtraJovial uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken.

XtraJovial

This user is a participant in the Trains WikiProject.

This user is a member of
WikiProject Trains in Japan.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Redirect

This user is a member of the Association of Redirectionist Wikipedians.

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

This user contributes with Twinkle.

This user is bold, but not reckless, in updating pages.

<ref>

This user would like to see everyone using inline citations. Please...

This user identifies as queer.

This user is a railfan.

This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia.

This user has been an extended confirmed user for 2 years and 4 months. (verify)

This user is a recent changes patroller.

This user has been a pending changes reviewer for 1 year, 5 months, 1 week and 4 days. (verify)

This user has been a rollbacker for 1 year, 4 months, 1 week and 5 days. (verify)

I come here ~~occasionally~~.

Update: I came around more often than I originally anticipated.

I try my best to improve articles and add sources where need be. It's not easy (the fact that most of the sources I use are Japanese-language and Google Translate doesn't do that great of a job makes it a lot harder), but it's definitely worth it.

I've been formally editing wikis since around 2015, even though I've been reading them since 2011.

I've also been assessing several WikiProject Trains in Japan articles recently, albeit too optimistically. Many of them, in my opinion, were either rated inaccurately or haven't been assessed for a lengthy period of time and now poorly reflect the article's current state.

Occasionally I'll patrol recent changes, often looking for vandalizing, unsourced, or otherwise non-constructive edits that go against the purpose of Wikipedia.