Hi, thanks for uploading the nice File:Aurora Borealis Poster.jpg collage. I saw you were asking for advice on how to do the sourcing. You were quite right that we can use such a collage if all its components are licensed under CC-BY-(SA) or public domain. But to be quite correct about it, CC-BY requires that we credit the authors, so the image description page should list them somewhere. I've started adding a little bit to the image page, showing one way how this can be done in a nice and neat manner, and perhaps you could continue that with the remaining images. Thanks, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, as I see nobody posted the standard welcome blurb to you yet, here goes: :-)

Welcome!

Hello, 14jbella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((help me)) before the question. Again, welcome!

I tend to be very direct in messages at times and sometimes people take that as anger or aggravation, so please bear with me and let me assure you that I am neither. However, although your removing this tag was well-intentioned, you were very premature in doing so. Revamping an article such as this one can sometimes take several weeks with occasional breaks in between, so a lack of activity for a few days is not unusual. I have also been ill, which has slowed work further since I am the main editor on this article. There is also an assessment on the Music section which has to be made before it can be reworked; another editor with whom I've worked in the past agreed yesterday to do this but, again, this will take time. Please remain patient. Jonyungk (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page lurker:) Well, to be fair, the template explicitly says "If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template" – which is exactly what 14jbella did. Can you be more specific about what the benefit of that template is if left for so many days? Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per Fut.Perf, here's some quick but reasonably thorough info on Under Construction: The purpose of the tag is to let others know that an article is being rewritten, restructured, expanded or extensively copyedited. This notification becomes especially important when the article in question is an FA or has a large number of viewers per day; both of these are true with Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. Work can be extensive, take several weeks and vary on the amount of work being done at one time. Some sections will be heavily copywritten or edited, while others will need less work. The time needed to complete this work can also depend on how many editors are at work and other priorities such as job, illness and other factors. Not everyone can be a Wiki editor 24/7—we also have lives to lead outside Wikipedia. If you are not sure whether work has stopped on an article and the tag should be removed, the best thing is to first ask the editor doing the majority of work on the article. This information can be easily accessed in the article's edit history. If you don't get a response from that editor within, say, a week, then it might be alright to remove the tag. Otherwise, patience can be the best course.Jonyungk (talk) 15:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I thought you had put the link on the page. It had a where to buy link which would classify it as spam. I removed the reference from veal. Thanks for your message. Jim1138 (talk) 02:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to Wikipedia, I think we are all in trouble! ;) BTW: I should have read your edit summary, it would have saved me grief! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there hows it going? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty543 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may find these categories to be interesting and helpful.

• Category:Music
• Category:Wikipedia backlog
• Category:WikiProjects
  • Category:WikiProject Music
• Category:Wikipedians

—Wavelength (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a "Cite" toolbar at the top of the edit window which allows you to automatically generate the required wiki code.

You click one of the templates, e.g. "book", and fill in the details.

More information can be found in Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or the citations tutorial (the below video will play best in Firefox or Chrome):

Hope this helps,.

Ariconte (talk) 01:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	less is more
	Thank you for precision and focus on Johann Sebastian Bach! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!14jbella (talk) 17:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 39th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Runningwithscissors.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 14jbella. Another pianist, I see! I love the mezzo-nothing quote at the top of your user page. I hope you don't mind, but I went and edited your section on the drive page, because your second edit half an hour ago seems to have deleted the entry for Doctor Impossible, and you probably won't want to lose the word count for it. That was a very high-class copy edit, by the way, so I do hope you'll stick around and do some more. Oh, and when you're done with a copy edit, don't forget to remove the line that says:

((copy edit|date=xxxxxx))

at or near the top of the article. (I've done it for you at Doctor Impossible.) Best regards, --Stfg (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I removed it because I thought that it was a poor edit, and left the article ambiguous and confusing, and I wasn't sure how to fix it. That's also why I left the tag, but if you think it is worth keeping, I suppose you probably know better, as you have been around so much longer. Thanks! 14jbella (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article itself isn't brilliant, but that's not your fault -- you did everything a copy editor could be asked to do, and you made it a lot better. Reading it again, there's a non-sentence ("As Doctor Impossible plan failed and flees from Omega Man attacks") right at the end of the Biography section. It appears to have been added in this edit last July, and there are no variants in the history, so there's probably little hope of deducing what was meant from earlier versions of the article. Do you know the comics and understand what it's on about? If not, a possibility is to put a ((Clarify)) tag there and leave it at that. What do you think? --Stfg (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know anything about these comics; I just stumbled upon the article. A clarify tag would probably be the best course of action. I will be happy to add it. 14jbella (talk) 04:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of dead comic book characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manhunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thank you for all your hard (and fine) work on Johann Sebastian Bach. Not only for the numerous copyedits, but also for fixing other issues. Know that it is greatly appreciated. Good luck with your project making it into a Good Article. -- Lindert (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any assistance, feel free to ask me (although I am not a native speaker of English, so not of much use for copyedits.). -- Lindert (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!14jbella (talk) 20:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You should actually also be listed on the drive Leaderboard for number of words. Thanks for noting that about the 5K column! Allens (talk | contribs) 23:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to 14jbella for copy editing 2 articles to a total of 14,020 words during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for taking part. --Stfg (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Leaderboard Award – Number of 5k articles edited – equal 5th Place
		This Guild of Copy Editors Silver Award is awarded to 14jbella for copy editing 2 articles of 5000 words or more during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. --Stfg (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The 10k Copy Edit Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to 14jbella for copy editing List of dead comic book characters (13,399 words) during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive. Thank you for taking on this major task. --Stfg (talk) 19:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstars!

Hi can you copyedit this list. The reviewers are mainly concerned with the prose quality. It's very short and shouldn't take much time. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

less is more
Thank you for precision and focus on Johann Sebastian Bach! - You are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were the 39th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eight years ago, you were recipient no. 39 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]