To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

23:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Ad Orientem (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Final Space seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me if you have any relation to the account User:Acezod or the IP address 86.162.114.226 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? Both of these users have added very similar information about the fandom to the Final Space article. wizzito | say hello! 02:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tunakanski. I noticed that you recently removed content from Williams Street without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Tuna ^No_SurprisesPlease 20:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that triggered the edit filter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Materialscientist (talk) 00:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

STB (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

STB (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Unicorn: Warriors Eternal. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Everyone is getting tired of your beliefs right now. It is always disruptive to revert edits others may disagree on when there is no consensus. Continue this behavior, expect a report. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 22:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am User:Aoidh and I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I was alerted to the content dispute at Unicorn: Warriors Eternal regarding the label of "adult animation" via this discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, and protected the page for 3 days so that editors can hopefully focus on discussing the content on the talk page and come to some sort of consensus on the content. An editor has provided a reliable source that does appear to describe the show using that descriptor, and I would encourage you to visit the talk page and discuss the content and the reference. I also noticed that both sides of the dispute have become gradually more heated in their edit summaries, and would ask that you please read WP:AVOIDYOU and focus comments on the content itself so that WP:Civility is observed, which as the fourth of Wikipedia's Five Pillars is one of the most important aspects of this site; it's easiest to discuss and collaborate when being civil with each other, especially when you disagree with them. Please visit the article's talk page and discuss the content so that a consensus can be formed on whether that descriptor should be used or not so that the back-and-forth edit warring does not continue. Thank you. - Aoidh (talk) 01:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at Unicorn: Warriors Eternal.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Aoidh (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Aoidh (talk) 17:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of adult animated television series of the 2020s, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jam Filled Entertainment. Waxworker (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jam Filled Entertainment. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Jam Filled Entertainment. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]