Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. through which multiple users may connect to the InternetTo have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ben Swann. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 16:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Drmies (talk) 17:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Hi there. Given that your edits keep getting reverted, perhaps you should consider proposing them on the talk page and seeing if you can garner a consensus for them. I know it's tedious having to defend and argue just to make a minor wording change, but unfortunately that's just how it is for such controversial topics. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ben Swann shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 00:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
It's not really debatable.It really isn't, but not for the reasons you're claiming. I'm not watching your page anymore, so don't bother responding to me. I won't read it. Also, you're not welcome at my talk page, so don't bother posting there, either. Finally, you need to follow WP:TPG, so don't bother continuing this line of argument at article talk. Either do things the right way, stop doing them on your own, or we'll have an admin stop you. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:02, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Guy (Help!) 15:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Guy (Help!) 17:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Since you were last unblocked, you've defended claims that:
That alone would be enough reason to block an account. Throw in that you've wasted everyone's time and patience on talk pages and noticeboards, and it's clear that you're not here to build an encyclopedia, you're here to "right great wrongs" for conspiracy theorists.
Also, this rather makes me have to wonder if you're Swann himself. Were that the case, you were not supposed to edit the article to begin with. If you're not Swann and just one of his cronies, then you've been violating our terms of use.
For these reasons, I'm blocking this IP and will block any other IPs or accounts that I believe to be used by you. Ignore whatever time I set for the block for technical reasons, consider yourself indefinitely blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |