Can someone please edit 1272 and add Category:Leap years in the Gregorian calendar for me please? 75.170.36.185 (talk) 03:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that would be a mistake because the Gregorian calendar was established in 1582. Further, all edits by Special:Contributions/75.170.36.185 make the same mistake and ought to be rolled back. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bednarek, I agree. How about the editor himself? Do we have consensus? Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 06:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, let's leave 1272 as is and revert the other good-faith edits. They would have been leap years in the proleptic Gregorian calendar, but I don't think that's what Category:Leap years in the Gregorian calendar is for. Certes (talk) 12:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Politrukki. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alan Jackson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Politrukki (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crboyer (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a YouTube Video I made. 75.170.36.185 (talk) 05:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2CM1UNqYiM

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  EvergreenFir (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Alan Jackson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 11:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alan Jackson. ZLEA _T\^C 20:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 21:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]