Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

• Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
• To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
• You can experiment in the Sandbox.
• For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
• Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
• You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk 14:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Churches of Christ has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you seem to be interested in the biography aspect of wikipedia, which I am also interested in, and I am taking a course at Sydney University for writing wikipedia content. I look forward to you checking out my stub and looking forward to a re-assessment. My stub is Paul Colin. Thank you very much!IIVYLII (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected some minor errors in ref tag placement and reassessed the article. It still needs sources provided for much of its content. —ADavidB 12:49, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for fixing some of my edits on Bannon's page. I didn't know about the period outside the quotes rule, and incorrectly assumed that brackets in the Shapiro quote were Wikipedia editorializing, and not the source's. Thanks for catching everything, and I will be more careful next time! RadleyMadish (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Happy editing, —ADavidB 01:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, I think I need a snooze! Neils51 (talk) 14:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fully understand. —ADavidB 17:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I came to thank you for improving a caption I wrote but I am so impressed by all the other stuff you have done, I think you deserve this! HouseOfChange (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! —ADavidB 01:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place ((Ds/aware)) on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a friendly head's up that a discussion was started on the reliable source noticebaord to determine if the Journal of Park and Recreation Administration is a reliable source. You may be interested in participating in the discussion, so I wanted to let you know about it and say you may participate here. Have a good day! Elijahandskip (talk) 03:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Adavidb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I noticed that recently you added an edit to this page with a ref sourced only to "blah." Was this a placeholder? Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I remember updating the representative to Fink, though don't remember placing or leaving the 'blah' citation for it. Thanks for removing it, and I'm sorry it remained there since December. —ADavidB 02:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the notice about a broken anchor yesterday morning, but didn't have time to resolve it. This morning I find that it's been deleted due to being "unsourced". Now, the subject of the link was supposedly a television series, which if true means that a source should exist, whether or not it's been cited. Because this is not a controversial statement in the biography of a living person, material should generally not be deleted unless sources do not exist—not because they haven't been properly cited.

Following up on the broken link, I failed to discover any mention of mermaids at the originally-linked article about a 1998 television series, or the 2018 reboot, or the episode list of the latter (I didn't see a stand-alone list for the 1998 series). But I did find the reason why on the talk page of the 1998 series: the entire section was moved from the article to the talk page, because it concerned a planned series that was not picked up for production, and according to the sourced cited—and there clearly were several citations to presumably reliable sources—it was not "really" a spin-off.

Now, I really don't want to have to dig in to whether it was or wasn't a spin-off. That seems like a debatable thing and I've never watched either series. And I also don't know whether the production or pre-production of a pilot for a television series that wasn't picked up is notable enough to be mentioned at Mermaid. I would rather leave both of those to people more familiar with writing about pop culture or involved in developing this article, which I haven't been for several years, although I patrol it for vandalism. But there clearly are sources for a pilot being planned/made, and so IMO the claim shouldn't have been deleted as "unsourced".

I understand there may have been confusion due to there being no mention of mermaids at the target article, but then again it's unusual to move entire sections of an article to the talk page. As someone who's actively involved in the development and maintenance of Mermaid, I hope that you will be able to review the source material and determine whether an unproduced television series is worth being mentioned, which is the question I think must be answered, rather than whether the sources for that planned series were cited by the broken link. P Aculeius (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the research and information. As it was, I didn't consider it notable. I'll look into it more, and have no problem with others doing so. —ADavidB 14:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please add Dr. Ahmed Ezzat, born on April 22, 1991. He is a well-known doctor and has news in major newspapers such as Sky News.

https://www.skynewsarabia.com/program/influencer/1596612

https://m.gomhuriaonline.com/Gomhuria/1152372.html

https://gate.ahram.org.eg/News/4159397.aspx

https://www.alwatanvoice.com/arabic/news/2022/06/23/1479362.html

https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/2828656

https://ahmedezzat.website 129.45.65.113 (talk) 16:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adavidb!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vintage Stock logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Adavidb. I noticed that you seem to be interested in writing about musicians, I was wondering if you would have time to check my article about Canadian composer Airat Ichmouratov. I've been working on it since its inception in 2015 and would appreciate any advice on how I could enhance its quality. Currently rated as a start class, I'm eager to learn how I can elevate it to a higher level.

I welcome and appreciate any guidance... All the best. Patrick0506 (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found that the article easily rated as a B class, and made it so. There remains room for improvement, however. I went through the Career section and made various grammar and formatting updates. Similar changes can be made to the other sections. I also made other minor updates throughout the article. Happy editing —ADavidB 02:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, your work is so professional and very inspiring, thank you! I'll keep working and learning. Patrick0506 (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill Workman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Test —ADavidB 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC) —ADavidB 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you used AWB to make an edit that does not appear to have an effect on the rendered page. If so, that is a violation of AWB Rule 4. Please take care when using AWB to make only edits that change the rendered page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had AWB set to skip "only cosmetic changes". I will add "only white space" as another skip option. —ADavidB 19:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope that works. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]