Hi AdoTang! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tarheel95 (Talk) 23:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re this. Yes, there certainly were air rage incidents as we would now define them prior to 1994. However ... the airlines were generally loathe to bring charges until then and that tends to keep those incidents from getting the sort of press coverage modern ones do (which of course was the point ... Consider the incident with Jim Morrison and Tom Baker. Nothing came of it because the airline didn't want the bad publicity but today they would have had the FBI follow through and charge them).

I had a discussion about this a couple of years ago with another editor you may find illuminating. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you can just put your name on the list. Even though it's called "membership", it's basically just symbolic. Welcome! PJvanMill)talk( 20:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello AdoTang, and welcome to WikiProject Cleanup! Thank you for joining. We hope to see you around on our main page, which has a big list of articles that need cleanup work. PJvanMill)talk( 20:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		For typing ==Background== and some other text on the 2021 Suez Canal obstruction. They say that; "if everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough" and that edit to the article only a day after it happened was speedy. Actually, I have no idea if anyone says that Possibly the greatest edit on Wikipedia ever made. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am following the steps both yourself and the Wikpedia outlined in their page Dispute resolution. I am reaching out in attempt to see if this conduct dispute can be resolved in a proper manner.

I am understanding in that my article does not conform to the rules set up by Wikipedia (I was doing my level best as a new editor to look for sources, use a created page by the subject which has been allowed before, used no consensus sources which are allowed in a case-by-case basis, and other attempts). It is apparent that the majority of editors on the page (not unanimous) want the article deleted. Had it been a more civil discussion, it would be completely understandable that my article did not meet the qualification for a Wikipedia-approved article.

However, in the conversations, some issues came up. I made some valid points in defense of my article, and there was not a single proper acknowledgment of any valid points I brought up. Nearly all were stating why they felt it should be deleted; my points were either ignored or excused away instead of pointing out the valid points I had made.

As a point in my favor, there are many rules brought up for editors and one very big one that any honest interpreter would see is "Please do not bite the newcomers". There are 17 recommendations on how to avoid biting newcomers and it should be plain to see that these guidelines were not upheld during the discussions, the comments, and talk pages.

Since I am following the guideline of reaching out, I hope we can both look over the rules, make sure we are doing out best to follow them (both editing and conduct) and have a polite, respectable, accountable, discussion. Updatewithfacts (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you wanted to bring this to my talk page, but thank you for reminding me I should maybe clean this up. I'll ask Teahouse for some help making an archive or something.

Anyways, no one is obligated to respond to your messages. Especially when they're as long as you made them. Plus, in those messages, you made accusations that other editors were committing misconduct (without any proof; again, if you think people are actually being disruptive towards you, see WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE for information on what to do), and acted as if they entered your talk page and called you a slur or gave you false warnings or something. They didn't. No one's acting against you, they're just real people who looked over the article and decided "Yeah, I'll vote 'Delete'". They have no obligation to return to an AfD discussion page they voted on once to apologize to someone as if a teacher told them to; how would you feel if someone villainized you for, say, reverting a typo? I don't go reopening AfDs I've voted on every day, and I doubt they do either, and if they do, they were probably turned off by the large amount of text to read what you had to say. Not an insult, just how I'd go about seeing a wall of text accusing me of something, written by you or not.

If you want editing tips, I dunno. I mean, for starters, while you're allowed to defend your article on AfD, people generally don't appreciate it if you make large walls of text that could just be summarized into two or so lines; make it short and sweet to get your point across. As for page creation, maybe check WP:GNG. Look around AfD, look for the guidelines people say articles aren't following, read them, and you'll get a good understanding of what to do.

Oh, and because you have concerns that Wikipedia is biased, it is. AdoTang (talk) 22:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just had to say I'm still laughing at your comment on the Henry Gobus AfD discussion. Bravo yourself. Cabrils (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ravichandran C. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. He is a very very notable person in my State (Kerala, in India). Pls re-consider the action you have taken on this page.

I was thinking that wouldn't be a problem because encyclopedic tone, etc. However looking from any other perspective obviously that sounds funny and I look like a comedian. Invasive Spices (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was pretty good, though. AdoTang (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your view would be appreciated here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Police#Photographs Dreddmoto (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it would be useful changing the photograph there with some level of agreement. Thanks a lot. --Dreddmoto (talk) 17:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid edit warring as you have done on the Military aircraft article, if an edit is reverted, then discuss it on the talk page - Articles that have several images, are typically placed individually near the relevant text. Futher images should give the reader an easy well-defined visualization of the subject matter, this image is not an improvement: Currently the page seems to have the right, amount, with the best to illustrate the content - See: WP:IMAGEMOS, for more information- Thank you FOX 52 ^talk! 07:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll admit my first revision with images for each subsection was a bit much, but come on. You revert me, I cut it down, you revert it again, and suddenly I'm waging an edit war? Whatever, let's try a compromise here. I have three potential solutions in mind, because I'm really trying to resolve these without getting too pissy about it:

• The multiple image returns to the top as it was in this revision, but with no other images in the article.
• Same or similar images from the above revision's multiple image, but dispersed throughout the article.
• Exact same format and positioning as the current state of the article, but with more diverse images (the article's images seem pretty Western-centric).

AdoTang (talk) 13:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me clarify, avoid starting edit wars in general - Images clusters should not be used so long as there is space for images to be effectively presented adjacent to the text per: WP:GALLERY - And keeping in line with the current layout, I'll dig up some non western airframes. For future edits try avoiding photos like these: (too dark) (subjects obscured) (poor quality)...aircraft in flight are also preferred. Lastly use wikilinks to ease crowding. - Cheers FOX 52 ^talk! 21:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AdoTang! I am one of AfC reviewers. Thank you for creating Draft:Unitized Group Ration. It's clearly a topic you are familiar with and it's a well-written page. Do you think it might be a good idea to merge it with B-ration where Unitized Group Ration currently redirects? I also thought it would be a good idea to add some more independent sources that are not directly related to the U.S. military so as to retain WP:NPOV (of course, military and U.S. government sources are very helpful, but it's always best to be balanced). Here is one book I found, which could be helpful: Cardello, Armand Vincent., Barrett, Ann H.. Military Food Engineering and Ration Technology. United States: DEStech Publications, Incorporated, 2012. I don't believe this book has been referenced in the article yet? Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and whether you prefer merging or feel strongly that this article should remain on its own. Ppt91^talk 18:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the merger suggestion, the UGR is, as far as I can tell, separate from what the B-ration is. The modern B-ration seems to be a component of the UGR (specifically the UGR-B/M), not the other way around. So it's kind of its own thing.

As for the sources, yeah, I just noticed those today. To be fair, it's not like many non-military sources will cover what a UGR is—it is, at its most basic, just cafeteria food for the field—but I did find a few mentions in the New York Times and CNN, though they're mostly passing mentions. I'll also try and check that book if I can. It's a bit difficult to wade through all the surplus stores selling UGRs in bulk, but thanks for the pointers. AdoTang (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unitized Group Ration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ppt91^talk 15:38, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LAPD Special Investigation Section. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 07:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LAPD Special Investigation Section, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Unitized Group Ration at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nomader -- Nomader (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) and Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nomader -- Nomader (talk) 04:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! I can nominate it for DYK, if you'd like. BorgQueen (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, was planning to do that myself. I dunno if I'll add it today; kind of want to add another section, though I'm not sure what to add. Thanks for the offer, though. AdoTang (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. I'll leave it to you then. BorgQueen (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Food and Drink Barnstar
		Hereby I award you this barnstar for military rations. Nice work! BorgQueen (talk) 23:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'm right about the EngVar used, yes? Just checking. BorgQueen (talk) 16:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, yeah, but I usually view that as being for strictly American topics, and military rations are quite general. I don't mind it being in there though. AdoTang (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's just that the EngVar needs to be consistent throughout the article, hence the notice to let others know when they come to edit it. BorgQueen (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nomader -- Nomader (talk) 05:42, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Unitized Group Ration, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Unitized Group Ration – Express is designed to heat food itself without the need of a field kitchen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Unitized Group Ration. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Unitized Group Ration), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Military rations, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that not all military rations are food? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Military rations. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Military rations), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article LAPD Special Investigation Section, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the LAPD Special Investigation Section trains military special forces in surveillance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/LAPD Special Investigation Section. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, LAPD Special Investigation Section), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pizza Tower Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a gameplay demonstration of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six boosted its popularity when it accidentally showed AI teammates rescuing hostages by themselves? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Handwich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 05:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Handwich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 02:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Einmannpackung Typ1 Inhaltsübersicht.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I participated in the discussion about Quick reaction force and Rapid reaction force Merger.

I think that you are good at military field.

If you have spare time, Can you participate in below discussion?
Spartan_3000 Discussion

Anyway, Thanks!Footwiks (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Handwich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Adog (Talk・Cont) 15:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have recently changed the thumbnail size of many lead images to fixed pixel widths. Please do not do this per WP:IMAGESIZE. (Hohum ^@) 10:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not supposed to do that? Sorry, I thought it'd be better to fix them to the size of the War category box. AdoTang (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marek Obrtel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that former Czech Army doctor Marek Obrtel returned his military decorations from NATO operations in 2014, citing his pro-Russian and anti-American views? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marek Obrtel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marek Obrtel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1973 New York City hostage incident you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Argenti Aertheri -- Argenti Aertheri (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1973 New York City hostage incident you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1973 New York City hostage incident and Talk:1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Argenti Aertheri -- Argenti Aertheri (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1973 New York City hostage incident you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1973 New York City hostage incident for comments about the article, and Talk:1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Argenti Aertheri -- Argenti Aertheri (talk) 04:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one NYPD captain called the 1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis the "birthplace of hostage negotiation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1973 Brooklyn hostage crisis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article BattleBit Remastered, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that BattleBit Remastered, a massively multiplayer online first-person shooter, was created by three indie developers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/BattleBit Remastered. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, BattleBit Remastered), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KFC rice, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that KFC rice may have originated as a quick, cheap Christmas dinner, owing to the popularity of KFC in Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KFC rice. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KFC rice), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,664 views (1,472.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Venetian Blinds (video game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Venetian Blinds (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Venetian Blinds uses Venetian blinds to simulate Venetian blinds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Venetian Blinds (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Venetian Blinds (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,376 views (849.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]