Welcome to Wikipedia.I see your a first time editor.Please follow Wiki guidelines before editing. superbottt 59.92.200.63 (talk) 04:44, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article India, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 14:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you remove the links to the Uncyclopedia article from so many pages (eg. [1])? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Pratap Bhanu Mehta meeting.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pernoctator (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i see you are new to wikipedia.don't upload images you find on the web.they are copyrighted and can't be used on wikipedia.it is illegal.Pernoctator (talk) 09:57, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Look dear.you might face a ban if you continue uploading copyrighted images from the worldwide web.please refrain from doing so.cheers.Pernoctator (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

only photos which you have taken or have a copyright status compatible with wikipedia can be uploaded.most images on the worlwide web are copyrighted they can't be used on wikipedia..my advise in simpler terms don't upload photographs taken by other people.only those taken by you.cheers.17:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pernoctator (talk • contribs)

Thank you; way to go :)

Lectonar (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Centre for Policy Research (CPR) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Corpus

Centre for Public Policy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CPP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Forum (shopping mall), you may be blocked from editing. Also, I will block you if you insert pictures which are copyrighted.Even if reliable sources were in fact added, making such a claim in an article where it isn't really relevant would still be inappropriate.(59.92.169.52 (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC))GoringoReply[reply]

(talk)--Goringo, Bro cut him some slack he's a new user! (Nirmal95 (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC))Reply[reply]

(Nirmal95 (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Copyright is something that Wikipedia takes very seriously. You cannot add material to Wikipedia that is directly copied from another website, like you just did at Centre for Public Policy. If you re-add copyrighted material again, I will request that you be blocked. Additionally, please do not remove maintenance tags (the notability tag) without providing some explanation or fixing the problem. At this point, that article contains no evidence that the organization meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Qwyrxian with this edit. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you, Jim1138 (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips	How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place ((Help me)) on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited International trade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kaushik Basu, on the 9% GDP growth, Aug 2011.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Octopus's Garden. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 16:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at WT:WikiProject Apple Inc..
Message added 16:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

The Anonymouse (talk • contribs) 16:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

nice userpage. Harishrawat11 (talk) 13:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Distribution System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to new editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia and be media literate. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by öBrambleberry of RiverClan 18:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Hi! Just a word of caution. You really shouldn't have so much personal information on your userpage. Your full name, your date of birth and the city you live in are plenty of information for someone to commit an identity theft crime upon you! Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Thanks for creating Irrigation in India, Ajayupai95!

Wikipedia editor Nickaang just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi there! Thanks for creating the article :) Regards, NickAang (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Nickaang's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Goli Vada Pav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goodwill

Inside Apple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Murray

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puppet on a Chain (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live and Let Die (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 23:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Hi! Thanks for asking a great question about when, why, if, and how to go about nominating an article for deletion. Deletion is in important tool we use to keep the content on Wikipedia at a certain standard, and it's awesome that you wanted to learn more about it. Cheers!

	Great Question Badge
	Awarded to those who have asked a great question on the Teahouse Question Forum. There are no stupid questions, but some are excellent! Good questions are those that reflect serious curiosity about editing and help others learn. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Ocaasi ^{t | c} 02:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 10:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Hi Ajayupai! So glad you're looking for someone to teach you more about Wikipedia. I'm a bit busy right now to adopt a user, but there are many great options you can browse through at WP:ADOPT. Please let me know if you have any questions! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hostage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raj Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

thank you sir!sir i edited ficn page i want to create article please help me and how?d — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjohn13 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Revolution in The Valley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - ʈucoxn\^talk 23:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at Jtmorgan's talk page.
Message added 23:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

- J-Mo Talk to Me Email Me 23:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at Tucoxn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

thank you sir drink some bubble tea. Davidjohn13 (talk) 05:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Ajayupai95. I am writing you here to answer your question at the Teahouse, where I am a host (you, too, I think?). I looked at the above article and my best advice to you is, Stop now! I am not commenting on the content as I don't have, nor do I wish to acquire, any knowledge on the subject. What I do know is Wiki policy, etiquette and procedure. The content you removed was referenced. Not well referenced, but referenced. You should not refer to the removal of referenced material as vandalism removal, and you didn't. You were basically starting the WP:BRD cycle. A better procedure rather than leaving a novella's worth of text for an edit summary would have been to start a discussion at the talk page. The other editor should have started a discussion at the talk page and should not have called his revision "vandalism deleted", although the removal of referenced material could under some circumstances could be considered vandalism. So far, I don't see any problems, just mistakes. However, again without starting a discussion on the talk page, you have removed it again. This is approaching an edit war which is why I have asked you to stop. If you are feeling emotional about this, go have a cuppa tea, or walk the dog, or whatever works for you. When you get back, start a discussion! If the other editor does not respond, leave a polite note on his talk page asking him to come talk about it. If he still refuses, wait a few days before you do anything further. Make sure you have an argument you can support with reliable references, put your reasoning at the talk page with references, and go to WP:3O and request a third opinion. If you continue on your present course of reverting his replacements, you risk a block for edit warring. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Charles (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 18:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 01:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Joerg357!!! I would seriously advice you to put up your article on Forensic data analysis for DYK... Do check out the page and you will realise that you've done a great job.. You might have to increase the content and add references and clean it up a bit, but if you do then you already got a DYK to your name!!!!

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at 27.60.2.59's talk page.
Message added 08:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 08:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Mr. TheOriginalSoni... You saw for yourself how this editor functions... Can we do anything about this??? I do not want to take this case any further, because I don't wan to stoop to the levels of such editors, but this user's attitude is appalling!!! It most certainly is a COI, why else would there be such a vengeful revert... I am sorry but this has to be resolved, once he/she gets away I don't know what else can be manipulated... I'm sorry but this will have to end... And I'm sorry if I've requested a block of the user too soon and in anger but I hope you will agree... Would you advice me to undo his revert??? Its all our call, I asked Gtwfan52 who was exceptionally helpful and helped me access your help... You guys are great and I'm positive that matters will have resolved!!! BTW why in the name of God did you RETIRE??? We need people like you... Anyone would say that looking at your contributions... So two requests-1. Solve this case, 2. Plz get back on Wikipedia!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep Calm and Carry On. There is no need to panic. And certainly no need to Assume Bad faith. You don't need to be angry. You don't need to be trying to block this user. Edit wars happen all the time. Just keep editing Wikipedia, and remember to keep your emotions back while editing (That is why matters escalate here 90% of the time)

Just chill and continue editing Wikipedia as you are doing. I would also suggest that you get Adopted to familiarize yourself with editing here.

Sorry about the retirement, but until I have given my JEE, I wont be frequent enough here [Atleast that's what I keep telling myself and everyone].

Cheers, and happy editing

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, BusterSeven, Gtwfan52 and TherOriginalSoni... I think this will have effectively ruined me appearance as a calm and straightforward editor, So be It!! In all my edits(part from this exception) I have made as unemotional edits as possible, explaining why it was done and also requesting others to ask me why I've made the edits... Now I find that this one IP hopping user is ruining it all... By now even you are of the impression that I'm edit warring, but if you did look thru you would have seen that he/she started it!!! I've had enough of this guy so I will wait for a few days, then I will go thru Ministry of Defence (India), its talk page, and if he hasn't replied, I will revert my edit with an unemotional summary and let it go... As much as I'm interested in these articles I will let it go, and leave it you guys to do what you feel is right...I must say that you guys have been supremely helpful and I will always repect that... I would still wish to clear my bad image by stating that I will let this go and be the better person by not getting involved in such a useless fight... Thank You and Forgive me!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I have no idea what you are trying to do, or claiming to do. I think (One can never be sure) that you might be correct in the issue, but I dont think you are right on the etiquette to handle it. This user has most certainly been unreasonable in marking your edits as vandalism and rubbish, but that does not mean you slap a level 4 notice on him. I would have tried a level 1 or 2 notice, and wait until he replies. If not, you can always bring the issue to discussion, as you did by coming to the Teahouse. But dont lose your head over this one. Its a very minor issue, and things like that happen all the time. Just add the pages to your watchlist and keep an eye on further changes. You'll know when this guy trying to revert/discuss the iissue. Once again, Keep Calm and Carry On. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We all commit forgivable sins. Your desire to be a congenial straightforward Wikipedia editor and collaborator is not effected by this minor detour. Wikipedia editing can be a difficult task and maintaining a proper decorum can be a challenge. You are not alone in facing that challenge. . You will be fine. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everybody gets spun once in a while. The trick is not to let your own emotions harm you. So, you either walk away from the situation for a bit until you are calmer, and if that doesn't work, you make a promise to yourself that you will stay away from the source of your irritation. There are thousands of other things you can do around here. Gtwfan52 (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article has been protected. ```Buster Seven Talk 18:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have restored the content of User talk:Harishrawat11 that you removed. You removed block notice and unblock requests concerning a active sanction. Those are not supposed to be removed. I do not know why you did that archiving. GB fan 13:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Hi GBfan, I'm really sorry, but I think it was an honest mistake... I was unaware that I had archived the Block requests... I am completely aware of why Block notices and unblock requests are required to be present on the user's talk page, but I think I was working 2-3 other pages and absentmindedly archived them... I am truly sorry for the mistake, won't happen again...:( Ajayupai95 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Respawnables is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Respawnables until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ref formatting wasn't a problem, in fact I fixed it already for you through WP:REFLINKS. My concern was the failure of WP:GNG, and per policy, this necessitates a discussion about possible deletion. If you can address GNG concerns, the article will be kept. Also, if it is deleted, you can always ask for it to be userfied so you can keep it and improve it until such a time it becomes notable and can be restored. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Economics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Equilibrium and Growth

The Respawnables (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mines

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is a reliable source, and you can use it to reference information on Wikipedia. If in doubt, ask here: WP:RSN. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir,the page is persistently vandalised and it also does not provide credible info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjohn13 (talk • contribs) 13:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you need to go back and read the speedy deletion criteria. I just declined your speedy deletion nomination of College of Basic Science and Humanities. You tagged it with three different criteria and none of them applied to the article when you tagged it.

• A7, educational institutions are exempt from deletion under A7.
• A1, only applies when there isnt enough content to understand what the article is about. Looking at the version you tagged I could tell this is about a college in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India and that it is an Education and Research Institution.
• A3 does not cover a page having only an infobox and this article had an infobox when you tagged it.

Please slow down and make sure the tags you are applying are correct. GB fan 13:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re your response on my talk page. I did not create this article, I am just the admin that reviewed your deletion nominations and had to cleanup after you. This isn't the first time I had to cleanup your inaccurate tagging of new articles. My message above was to try to help you understand the speedy deletion criteria better so in the future you are not tagging articles with inaccurate tags. GB fan 12:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, this is Sonofaphrodite, the user who created the August Booth page. Before, when you subjected my page to deletion, I wasn't finished with it yet. As you know, I am quite busy and I have to create my pages little by little instead of all at once. The page is finished now and it is purposed to be all about a character from the ABC television series, Once Upon a Time.

• Hey Sonofaphrodite, I'm really sorry...i didn't see that it was still being created... Please add a under construction tag the next time you create articles that you wish to expand regularly... Anyways I'm really sorry...

Hi,

I added more content and reference to the article the quality of which you showed concern for. Hope that resolves the issue.Kazemita1 (talk) 09:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Thomas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjohn13 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article is linked to the International One Design page under Racing with Elliott Wislar - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_One_Design. Hopefully that will resolved the issue of the article being an orphan and stub. --Prestome (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 13:45, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Ajayupai95,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged QWERTY Tummy for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

all good on wislar and thanks for the brownie! --Prestome (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is not acceptable for you to complain that the stubs I'm putting in in place of redlinked articles are too small and have the remedy be that you delete the text in them and put me to working on expanding them. These stubs all have links to the official websites. If you are bothered by their short length, please feel free to add to them using the district website as a source or whatever else fits within Wikipedia guidelines. That would be productive. What you proposed would not be, especially if you went through all the stubs I've created (far more than the dozen you've spotted). TMLutas (talk) 07:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I saw your recent submissions to Wikipedia: Articles for deletion. There is no need to submit an article to AFD if it already falls under the Criteria for speedy deletion. You can place the Speedy Deletion template on the article instead. Or since you use Page Curation you can simply use the Speedy Deletion bar there instead of the Articles for Deletion bar when the article falls under of the Speedy Deltion Criteria's. Have a nice day! If you have any questions, let me know. :) -XapApp (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do you read Danish? If not, it seems unwise to tag this as "Reviewed". Try Google Translate - the article is clear vandalism.

But in any case, if you add the "Needs translation" tag as you did you also need to complete the reporting by adding a message to Wikipedia:Pages_needing_translation_into_English#Pages_for_consideration, as is clearly explained within the template message you added to the page. Please slow down and read messages like that more carefully. PamD 10:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In case the article has been deleted by the time you see this, the wording of the "Needs translation" template includes (with links):

If you have just labeled this page as needing translation, please add ((subst:Needtrans | pg = Pikdyret Perry | Language = unknown | Comments = )) ~~~~ to the bottom of this section of Pages needing translation into English.

It's pretty clear what you have to do, so please take more care. PamD 10:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at PamD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Oooh, I got busted by the cops. Don't you have anything better to do? Geeze. Jra (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pretty much, school articles are untouchable. As long as it is proven they exist, which the school website is plenty good enough to do, they will ALWAYS survive an AfD. The advice the man gave you above is spot on. Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, that's true for high schools - not for elementary/primary schools. PamD 23:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Respected editors of Wikipedia, You may have seen that I have been blocked under alleged sockpuppetry, and this I make this request to those who have converse with me or have at any time helped me or corrected me to plz HELP ME!!!! I can promise you wit all honesty and truth that I am not a sockpuppetry of Vrghs Jacob!!! My user contributions show that I make diverse edits and have no connection to Vrghs Jacob... I love Wikipedia and have always tried to help, I'm addicted to it and will always hope that I'm a part of it forever, but now all of that ha gone down the drain... I will do whatever you ask me to to prow my innocence!!! Plz help me get out of this false accusation... I will never be able to take a look at Wikipedia again if I lose his account!! I have always tried to abide by the its rules and now it is all lost!!! I beg of you to plz help me and allow me to edit again!!! This is my humblest request!!!! I repeat I am not a sockpuppet!!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(stalkers---)See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vrghs jacob for further info. ```Buster Seven Talk 12:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir I appeal to you! I am not involved with that user! Apart from the ministry of Defence (India) page I don't junk I have ever come across him.. I hope you understand sir!! I swear to God I am a completely different person! I am not a sock puppet! I eg of you to straighten this out!!! Plz !!!Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ajay. I have no checkuser or administrative power. I will do some investigating "from right field" but I can't make any promises. ```Buster Seven Talk 12:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have a question for you concerning this. On 15 Feb you "found" a blocked user, User talk:Harishrawat11, and archived their talk page. When I asked at the time you said it was a mistake. Now this user was identified as a sockpuppet of Vrghs jacob by the checkuser also. It seems like to much of a coincidence that you just happened to find that user and decided to set up archiving. Can you provide an explanation on how you found this user and why you decided to archive their talk page? GB fan 12:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, User:Davidjohn13's second edit as a new editor is to you. How would he know to contact you?. And why didnt you respond? ```Buster Seven Talk 13:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir I don't know what he meant that's why I didn't reply!!! Sir I don't know Davidjohn13 until he contacted me and only after which I sent him the Teahouse request! I don't know him until then sir! The honest truth! Plz ask him if he knew me from before, I assure u I didn't know him till then, reallyAjayupai95 (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see that his contact is confusing and hard to understand...BUT..Two new editors that bump into each other would correspond. Why would you not ask him what he meant? ```Buster Seven Talk 13:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I cant thank you enough sit!!! I promise you you will find that I am innocent!!! Can you please get the help of some admins to plz look they thru this case!! Can you ask Gtwfan52, OriginalSoni to also look thru, cause I assure you I am not a sockpuppet!!! Plz save my account! I will always be grateful to you!! go Phightins, PamD are also my acquaintances so plz ask them to justify on my behalf!!! I know there will always be great editors lik u! And most importantly plz don't lose hope in me! I am not a sockpuppet! U can rest assured that I'm not!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Sir I swear that I only came across this user once because the user actually sent me a wiki love and I then I got to know that his account was blocked and thought I shld archive he whole talk page!!!! I promise you it was a honest mistake and that actually our edits are very diverse, I just came across him only thru the wiki love and nowhere else!!! That is the honest truth sir, I hope u understand!! I even apologised to quickly and told you it was an honest mistake and it really was !!!!Ajayupai95 (talk) 13:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You still haven't explained why you decided to archive his talk page if all you knew about this person was that they sent you a wikilove message. GB fan 13:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, User talk:Harishrawat11 had only made 5 edits when they sent you that wikilove message and you have never edited any of those the articles they edited in those 5 edits. This just does not make sense that they found you when the two of you had not edited the same articles and then you decided to set up archiving on their page. GB fan 13:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I just went thru his edits andd also saw all that he did, and I just thought I shld archive it and actually I was learning how to archive talkpage and I tried it... I really had no other intention, I swear! I don't know how to tell u but it was just a spur of the moment that I thought maybe I shld archive his pages, I want even aware that locked user talk pages shouldn't be archived! That's it...I don't know how he found me Ajayupai95 (talk) 13:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not often that I get to quote Hamlet on Wikipedia... Yunshui 雲‍水

14:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Truth???? Taunt???? Joke??? I don't get it, all I really understood is that there could be a possibility that I'm innocent and I hope against hope that you also believe it !!! Plz believe me, I'm desperate to get this account back because I learnt, understood and accepted Wikipedia solely on this one account and I live this account too much I let it go, I might never return to Wikipedia if I lose it, that's y I'm desperate!! Plz, plz understand my plight!! I am not lying, take a chance and believe me... Plz Ajayupai95 (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Plz tell me I have some hope!! Would you plz tell me if you need anymore proof, I hope I'll be back soon, Can anyone plz get an admin to review this block, plz... I just don't wanna give up!!!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To get an uninvolved admin to review your block add ((unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~)) to this page and replace "your reason here" with why you feel you should be unblocked. I would suggest you read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks so you understand what is expected of you. GB fan 15:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajayupai95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There must be a misunderstanding, because I have mistakenly been blocked as a Sock Puppet of Vrghs Jacob, which I am not. I do understand the respected administrator's view that I may be a Sock Puppet, but I assure you, that I am not, and that it must be a misunderstanding. If you were to look through my contributions(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ajayupai95), you would find that I have come in contact with only two of the other sock puppets of Vrghs Jacob, namely- user:Harishrawat11 and user:Davidjohn13.

• Firstly, Harishrawat11 was the one who sent me a Wikilove(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ajayupai95), and thus was the one to contact me, not the other way round. I then realised that the editor was blocked and I made the mistake of archiving the user' s talk page. It was an honest mistake, as I was learning about archiving, as felt that maybe I should archive it, not knowing that block requests are not to be archived. I agree to that as my mistake, but an honest one, with no hidden motives. I even apologised to the user who informed me of my mistake.

• Secondly, I came across Davidjohn13, as a new user and sent him a Teahouse request, thus I am in no way associated to him, and that I kept a close tab on his edits, and thus the Wikiloves I sent him.

• Thirdly, I was involved in an edit wat with an unidentified IP No user who wished I retain some info on the Ministry of Defence (India), and if I were Vrghs Jacobs' or Harishrawt11's Sockpuppet, why would I delete my own edits? This only means that I am not Vrghs Jacob, but because in the edit war,I would be editing warring against myself. Thus it might have appeared that I was in connection with him. I humbly apologise for the edit war, but strongly deny that I am Vrghs Jacobs sock puppet.

• Nextly, I do believe that apart from the above incidents, I am in no way associated to any of the blocked users. Which would mean that I was blocked under only the above pretence and so I believe that my account being blocked was possibly unintentionally done.

• Lastly, I hope users such as user: Gtwfan52, user: Buster7, user: Go Phightins!, user: PamD, who are all acquaintances would probably justify that I am an independent editor, and not a Sock puppet. I actively participate in the Teahouse and welcome many users, and am part of many WikiProjects, and have made very diverse edits in contrast to Vrghs Jacob.

Sir/ Ma'am, I am a staunch follower of Wikipedia's rules and would never wish to flout them. I wish to contribute helpfully, gain knowledge as portray my views on various topics. I would never wish to he jeopardise Wikipedia and will always help expand it. I may have committed various mistakes and errors such as placing speedy deletions, language translation tags , etc without understanding the entire meaning of them. I wish to apologise and hope for forgivance for such mistakes. But I am not a Sock puppet and I hope I have proven that beyond doubt.

I am very fond of visiting Wikipedia and meeting other users, sharing knowledge, and developing the quality of Wikipedia, and not once have I though of affecting it with wrong deeds such as sock puppetry.

I fully accept my mistakes and request for forgivance,but only those that I just stated, not Sock puppetry because, I don't believe in it.

There must be a grave misunderstanding and I sincerely hope my unblock request is obliged. I honestly hope to return back I Wikipedia and forget this bad encounter.

Thank You Ajayupai95 (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Your explanations sounds very unbelievable, but in nany case checkuser evidence shows trhat you are one of many sockpuppets. A checkuser block will not be unblocked by anyone except a checkuser.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear editors could you plz get a Check user to review my unblock request, because I am in desperate need of it. Plz help me! Ajayupai95 (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not giving up, but it seems My explanation is unbelievable and I got declined... If anyone has any pity, plz contact a CheckUser to review this block, cause its a mistake.. I think I've explained how I'm not a sock puppet, I don't know which other way to prove it.. Users who knew me, plz go try our talks and just see if it appeared as if I was the same guy as Vrghs Jacob... I hope you would find that I am really not the same, and that I've been blocked unnecessarily... I hope I have someone atleast to rely on... Plz take 5 mins of your time to go thru this.. And help me, I m in earnest need of it...Ajayupai95 (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll have a word with a CU on your behalf. Given that checkuser has already implicated you I don't hold out much hope, but if it gives you any satisfaction... Yunshui 雲‍水 08:32, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir I will be ever so thankful for your help... I actually plan to prove my innocence to the CU so I believe that there still is hope.. I have been wrongly blocked so I will set or right so THANK YOU!Ajayupai95 (talk) 09:43, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Yunshui, so have asked a CU to look thu my unblock plea or should I put up another unblock request? Why isn't any admin or CU responding quickly??? I have been waiting all day?? Do you guys forget or is it that yo dot want to help.. I'm sorry but I was really hoping I would get some support or at least some attention until the matter is solved. I'm sorry for being soo blunt but I Just want my account Back to working condition...Ajayupai95 (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yunshui did ask a checkuser to look into it, User talk:WilliamH#Checkuser check requested. WilliamH hasn't made any edits since the request was made so he probably hasn't seen it yet. You need to be patient. GB fan 17:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Ajayupai95, could explain why you used YoyoJacob13 (talk · contribs) to file a sockpuppet investigation? I mean, four minutes after you made this edit, you created YoyoJacob13, and then used it to file that SPI case. Why? WilliamH (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sir I don't think Yoyojacob is my account, at Least I didn't create it, I remember making the Edit you stated, but I don't create any account. With due respect sir, I wish I tell you I don't believe I sock puppetry and so I wouldn't do it..Ajayupai95 (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edit conflict: I'll rephrase: four minutes after you made this edit, the account YoyoJacob13 was created from the same IP address as yours, using the same computer or device as you. My original question still stands, and I await your answer to it. WilliamH (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First, things like these take a lot of time. So you will have to be patient. If you are really who you claim to be, I'm sure you'll be unblocked in some time.

But truly speaking, this looks more like a case of lying than some exceptional co-incidence to me. So if you really are the person who has been operating all those accounts, I suggest that lying isnt going to do a great deal of help to you. All it will do is to make sure you cannot come back to Wikipedia. Ever. Every time you come back with another account, you'll get blocked again and again.

There are only two options for you now - Leave forever; or just go away for 6 months. If you do the second, you will be welcomed back here, and nobody will say anything against you. Come back sooner, or with another account and you will be blocked. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you telling me I mustn't make not a single edit for the next six months, but does it proves my innocence? And can I do everything normally again??? Then I think ok, yeah that might be ok, but I was really hoping for a fast solution...Ajayupai95 (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Title Screen of The Respawnables, 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Ajayupai95. You have new messages at XapApp's talk page.
Message added 10:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

I have removed access to edit your talk page. Your only recourse of appeal is the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee, as checkuser information was involved. --Rschen7754 03:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:

154 Featured Articles 53 Featured Lists 7 Featured Topics 5 Featured Pictures

43 A-Class Articles 589 Good Articles 9 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Feature: "A-class: Is It Worth It?" Interview: Teancum

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office ^connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail^{(talk • work)}, Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grand Hyatt Hotel, Mumbai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Ajayupai95/Mr. Ninja (game), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ajayupai95/Mr. Ninja (game) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ajayupai95/Mr. Ninja (game) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there, I am trying to revive the Apple WikiProject. Please come back and add your name to the participant list if you'd like to help me. Let's make this awesome. Come by today! Thank you, DJAustin (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Thanks for uploading File:Inside Apple's Cover page from paperback copy, 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centre for Asian Strategic Studies-India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Asian Strategic Studies-India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]