On 15 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kanye Zone, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the browser game Kanye Zone involves keeping Kanye West out of his "zone"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kanye Zone. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kanye Zone you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EditorE -- EditorE (talk) 03:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kanye Zone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kanye Zone for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EditorE -- EditorE (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 01:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amir Blumenfeld you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 06:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amir Blumenfeld you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Amir Blumenfeld for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amir Blumenfeld you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amir Blumenfeld for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TonyTheTiger -- TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Air fresh.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I wondered if you've ever considered making an FA nomination for Kanye Zone? It's an amazingly detailed and comprehensively written article for such a subject. I think it would it easily pass! JJARichardson (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion; I may do so in the future. ajmint (talk•edits) 19:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JakeandAmir.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chose Promise, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deathbed and D17. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arnaud Tsamere you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arnaud Tsamere you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arnaud Tsamere for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 18:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to emphasize what I said at the GA Review for Arnaud Tsamere.

I strongly recommend you please work with the French Wikipedia to improve this article, there, to the same level of quality it is, here, at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnaud_Tsamere.

It would be a great benefit to that website.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 21:07, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not sure I feel comfortable writing in French, and I'd rather focus on the English Wikipedia for now. ajmint (talk•edits) 21:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but you could work with the contributors at French Wikipedia to show them the quality work you've done already, no? — Cirt (talk) 21:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay well anyways I posted to the talk page for that article in the French version if anyone wants to use your Quality improvement project as a model for theirs. Excellent work, — Cirt (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that Goodbyeee, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 11 November 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 23:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your Quality improvement efforts on the article Goodbyeee, and helping to improve Wikipedia's high quality WP:FA content related to satire. And also congratulations on WP:TFA-day! — Cirt (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ajmint (talk•edits) 16:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbyeee
Thank you, awkwardly happy orange-loving user, for quality articles on Television such as Goodbyeee (quoting: I mean, who would've noticed another madman around here?), Amir Blumenfeld (who said: I'm probably a little smarter than the character though) and Jake Hurwitz (who said: My humor came from my dad), for a clear user page showing written and reviewed, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1028 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1028 of Precious! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chose Promise you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chose Promise you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chose Promise for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chose Promise you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chose Promise for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dozhd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajmint. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dozhd logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Ajmint. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 11:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pointless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajmint. I don't think this file is that notably different from the new titles so I have listed it to be deleted again. That's just my opinion though, so you're more than welcome to revert my edits if you think it necessary. Cloudbound (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Terence Wade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Terence Wade you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Terence Wade for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Terence Wade you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Terence Wade for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajmint. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajmint. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajmint,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Penshaw Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 05:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you'll see I've put the article On Hold. A bot will confirm this shortly. Technically, you've got 7 days to respond, but if you need longer just let me know. I hope the comments are clear, but do drop me a line on the review page if anything needs clarifying. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Penshaw Monument you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Penshaw Monument for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many congratulations. I'm only sorry I took so long. KJP1 (talk) 21:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Penshaw Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Penshaw Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I have reverted your edit of Houghton-le-Spring due to you adding an old lead. To inform you why it was changed its because the town is now part of the City of Sunderland and is in Tyne and Wear. So your right its North East England but North East England isn't a county. It's important to establish the county It's in then its location in England. So I've left your edit pretty much alone but instead Sunderland and Tyne and Wear are in the first lead then North East England. Which is the correct lead.

So please don't revert it as it needs to say which county it belongs to in lead. I trust you won't but any non reason reverts made will be reverted. Hope this clears for you. Have a good afternoon RailwayJG (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI Ajmint,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:If I Were You cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ajmint! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ONDAR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]