File:Andres2.jpg

Destos defuntos meos bene quidem... apriesa me revisto de sus decires e palabrerías; agora les oigo e cato; ad este paso me vais a volver loco et ansí les sigo fisgando.

Hi Albeiro, I probably erased it by mistake.. I'll put it back. About the Muiscas I'll have to study the subject. The article is a rough translation from the spanish version which is also not very well written. --User talk:F3rn4nd0

.. / - .... .. -. -.- / -- -.-- / . -. --. .-.. .. ... .... / .. ... / -. --- - / - .... . / -... . - - . .-. /. XalD (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember this? Your first funny ass response, completely without prompting.

--> I do not know if you are paranoid or no, but what is sad to me is that most observations point only to violence like there is an interest to keep the "image" of "the most violent city of the world" alived. It is like if you (I mean those interested in that point), just go to look the confirmation of what they think is Medellín, ignoring other facts like its importance not only in Colombia but in Latin America, a city of thinkers, universities, industry, poetry, festivals, commerce and so on. Violence actually is something very relative. A city can be very violent this summer or not. I live, for example, in a very violent city where you can not go alone in the night, however, nobody says that in its article, also because it has not the importance of Medellín. I am not a part of such campaign you say and I am the first to fight such campaign, but I can guest that such campaign is the consequence to the other campaign to show Medellín and Colombia as a violent-like Old West country (remember the rampant comment of the most British Sir Bob Ainsworth stating that we Colombians "are violent by nature" forgetting his hooligans?). For me you can concentrate in count numbers that actually we shoud not hide, since it will rise attention and promote more improvements, but let us work other proposals like that of showing Medellín as it is: a modern and Western city, so city as any city of Europe and North America and not a farm of chickens and that American image of an Old West gost town as it is presented by Hollywood. --Albeiror24 (talk) 16:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Bold 1: I had no idea what you were talking about, but if that was true there would be an entire, stand-alone crime article on the city. Hell, there's one for Los Angeles, New York and Detroit...why isn't there one for Medellín anyway? In fact it's RIDICULOUS that a city as violent as Medellín ONLY has a minor crime section! Why is it that only American cities seem to have them as full articles Al? Answer me that. It's bizarre, none of these places have anything REMOTELY like Medellín's death toll, so stop complaining.

Bold 2: Sihanoukville is much safer than Medellín historically and again you're only dragging one place down to make Medellín/Colombia look better. Then you go into this obsession you have that Colombia or Medellín are being purposefully targeted by Hollywood or individuals. THEN you start bringing English football hooligans into it, who are nothing LIKE criminals in Medellín or Colombia in general. The way I see it you're defending killers. Your comments got more and more paranoid as you went on. When people are raising genuine concerns over the tone of the article and wanting to keep it as factual as possible, don't target other cultures without provocation expecting people to just sit there and take it. Others (and I hope you) will see that I'm a very fair editor who leaves out emotions. Power Society (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You asked whether you need to do an editor review. The answer is no. It is suggested because many people want reviews, but if you don't feel comfortable doing it, then you don't have to. It is not required. -Rrius (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging is an option, if there isn't sufficient amount of information to warrant an individual article.Muntuwandi (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. --Albeiror24 - English - Español 16:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vaya, ¡¡agradezco tus palabras y tu voto!! La verdad es que no hemos tenido ni el gusto de conocernos, soy Diego, de Espania, dime una cosa, ¿¿tienes muchos conocidos que puedan apoyarme?? ;-). Ahora en serio, la candidatura no va a salir porque hay algo de malos rollos en la wiki espaniola, y dedicarle 3 horas diarias al proyecto no es suficiente..., y es que como dice alguien en la candidatura, es más fácil hacerse notario que biblio de la wiki, muchos saludos desde los EE.UU. a Camboya, eso debe ser la experiencia de una vida, ¿no?, ^poco@_pocoBaaaaaaang!!! 00:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Puedes olvidarte de la candidatura, hay que llegar a un 75% para sacarla adelante, es decir, 25 en contra precisan 75 a favor, cosa que no va a pasar, pero bueno, así es la vida. Si, si, yo también soy hombre de mundo...un abrazo para Camboya,

^poco@_pocoBaaaaaaang!!! 13:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Our Lady of the Assassins (film), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: La virgen de los sicarios. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On February 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yeay Mao, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations on your DYK. I'm sorry. I nominated the article at DYKI for you, but forgot to inform you about it - not very polite of me. By the way, I've seen the great work you have been doing on Cambodia articles - please keep it up! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, Sok Sabai! Whereabouts in Cambodia are you? Cheers, Paxse (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Moises Arias, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability and the content has been removed. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the article. You added a number of references to the article without providing a URL to the web source or sufficient information for someone else to verify the reference. I would be helpful for verification if you would include the links in the reference. TVRage and NNDB are not considered as reliable sources as facts are anonymouse user entered and not fact checked. IMDB is useful for casting information but not reliable for much else also because of anonymous user editing. A source you might consider using is http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20221831,00.html. Also see Wikipedia:Citation templates for useful formatting tools. --NrDg 14:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks NrDg. I removed then TVRage and NNDB. Actually I discovered that TVRage is banned in wikipedia. :) --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano 15:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments at Talk:Moises Arias. --NrDg 16:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now how funny is it to have we two Barang chatting to each other in poorly transliterated Khmer? Ot bunyha! Som swakom. Kiyom rueno no ti krong Phnom Penh chet dawp chnam howie. Srok Khmer jeer srok kiyom (note that was almost the Angkor beer slogan!). Cambodia is now my home. I'm delighted to meet another Barang in Cambodia here on wikipedia. You write fascinating articles - write more like Yeay Mao please! Paxse (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Midnightdreary (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Al,

I see that back in February you added this line to the Maieutics article: "But it is not proven than the historical Socrates is the original author, although it has to see with the Socratic School."

I don't understand the last part ("... although it has to see with the Socratic School"). Can you please explain what you meant or change the wording a bit? Thanks! Emptymountains (talk) 17:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I've noticed a message that you posted in the Category talk:Universities and colleges in Colombia page. I understand your concern, but I might be able to give you a comment on institution naming which might be kind of tricky. It is usual to translate the word "University" when referring to such institution. The same happens in Spanish, as for example es:Universidad Harvard, es:Universidad Yale, es:Universidad Brown, or es:Universidad Federal de Río de Janeiro. Although some of the examples are of notable institutions, I don't know if we can apply the same rule to all Colombian Universities. I must to admit that, nevertheless, the proper names like the department name, or so, should not be under any circumstance be translated. Also, it is common to find the use the translated name in published academic journals. I guess if you have any more comments, we could replace the english names for spanish names. Regards Andremun (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiProject Colombia
		You have been invited to participate in Collaboration of the Month to improve and standardize the List of Presidents of Colombia in hopes of raising it to featured list status.

mijotoba (talk) 23:47, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Bosco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Advice - Don't delete cited material. You have no consensus for deleting material in this article.--Morenooso (talk) 06:28, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, follow discussion in the Talk:John Bosco --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 12:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJohn_Bosco&action=historysubmit&diff=360589556&oldid=360524375 on Bosco's talkpage. I am sincere in my wish to end the dispute and will abide by a neutral third opinion. --Morenooso (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Going to see it just now. --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 06:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the DIFF of my post. It is neutral and describes what the reviewer needs to know. Whoever looks at it should review the article section and talkpage. I am glad we agreed on this matter and I pledge to honor whatever the Third Opinion is. Please note that my sig does not appear so as to not influence the opinion. I have found that regardless of the sigs on the talkpages, most TOs are helpful in resolving problems or disputes like this. --Morenooso (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, it may require about 12 hours or more but hopefully less. --Morenooso (talk) 06:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think because two other editors jumped in on discussing matters on his talkpage, the TO will be delayed. It's too bad they could not have waited. Now, we may never get one. --Morenooso (talk) 02:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was worst than I thought. Because the other editors jumped in, a Third Opinion cannot be rendered because the dispute has be between only two editors. I really wish the other two editors would have looked at what a TO is and not jumped on the talkpage. --Morenooso (talk) 14:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! I've removed the image of the Kingdom of Sardinia since knowing the size of his birth country (also, after a few years it became another after unification of Italy) it has no relevance at all in the comprehension of the article. Grazie and good work!!! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 07:18, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please bambino, do it not more. We are in reconstruction of the article. Thank you for your suggestions, but notify me first of any observation. Grazie :) --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope the result will be something less hagiographic than it is now. The article was clearly written by an adorator of Bosco. I wonder why people cannot maintain objectivity towards some figures!! Ciao e buon lavoro! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm agree. I am reviewing the article line by line. Thank you for your participation. It is very welcome. Grazie. --Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 04:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re the POV tag - what is going on with the article. You know, I thought you and I had consensus building until a couple of editors jumped in. Now, I really don't know what to think. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Albeiror, I'm working on the Campus Party article and as you created it in 2008, I thought you may like to take a look and help out if you have some time. Take care - Deniz (talk) 16:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia, 111123.

Estimado Albeiror24: Hace apenas unas semanas que me he interesado en la(s) teoria(s) de la comunicacion, y tuve la inmensa suerte de que google me sugiera un articulo que fue sumamente esclarecedor: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?hl=it&q=http://www.clt.astate.edu/mhayes/Craig%2520Article.PDF&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm0Nzws64_fyrAE_z8e7oNdDLZGxGQ&oi=scholarr El autor, [Robert T. Craig (scholar)] escribio este articulo [Communication Theory as a Field] que es una revision del tema teorico de la comunicacion y sus "tradiciones". Ambos, tanto el autor como el articulo, tienen paginas en wikipedia con los titulos que estan entre corchetes cuando los mencione. Creo oportuno invitarte a su lectura ya que estas escribiendo un articulo denominado "Communication theory" y por tu condicion de persona ligada a la comunicacion social.

Cordiales Saludos.

wikinauta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinauta (talk • contribs) 00:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias por esta sugerencia. Muy apropiada y en buena-hora. El tema merita una excelente referencialidad. Albeiror24 - English - Español - Italiano - ខ្មែរ 08:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Models of communication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Channel, Receiver, Process and Destination

Communication theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Statement

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who is listed as a participant for WikiProject Poetry, I hope you will be interested to learn of an attempt to revive the WP and alongside this the creation of task force to improve coverage of The Canterbury Tales. We are currently looking for participants to help set up the basics. Please get involved if you can, and we can hopefully revive this important project within Wikipedia! Many thanks, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 00:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kep Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kep Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to David Wilson and Kampot

Damnak Chang'aeur District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Albeiror24! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Albeiror24! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:

• We have an easy way to now cite WDL resources. You can learn more about it on our news page, here.
• Our to-do list is being expanded and features newly digitized and created resources from libraries and archives around the world, including content from Sweden, Qatar, the Library of Congress, and more! You can discover new content for dissemination here.
• WDL project has new userbox for you to post on your userpage and celebrate your involvement. Soffredo created it, so please be sure to thank them on their talk page. You can find the userbox and add it to your page here.
• Our first batch of WDL barnstars have been awarded! Congratulations to our first recipients: ProtoplasmaKid, ChrisGualtieri, TenthEagle, Rhyswynne, Luwii, Sosthenes12, Djembayz, Parkwells, Carl Francis, Yunshui, MrX, Pharaoh of the Wizards, and the prolific Yster76!! Thank you for your contributions and keep up the great work. Be sure to share your article expansions and successes here.

Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kep Province may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• by the Department of Tourism and 65 by the local Tourist Association according to www.visitkep.com).<ref>Kep City Cambodia. [http://www.kepcity.com/accommodations.html Accommodations]. Link

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Advanced Bank of Asia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kampong Cham, Kampong Speu and Kampong Thom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pascual Chávez Villanueva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Juan Edmundo Vecchi

added a link pointing to Blessed

Ángel Fernández Artime

added a link pointing to Astudillo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Philip Rinaldi

added a link pointing to Lu

Pietro Ricaldone

added a link pointing to Mirabello

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Paul Albera

added links pointing to Rio Negro, Casale, Mirabello and None

Philip Rinaldi

added a link pointing to Mirabello

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaime Ramírez Gómez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caqueta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:23, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Albeiror24. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jarai people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tampuan and Achinese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Albeiror24. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Albeiror24. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Albeiror24. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Albeiror24. You haven't edited in a few months so perhaps you're no longer active on English Wikipedia, but if you are then maybe you can help out an editor named Norasky57. This editor has been editing/creating articles related to Cambodian music artists so I'm guessing that they might be Cambodian. English doesn't appear to be there first language and they seem to be having difficulties understanding some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I found your name from meta:List of Wikipedias and since your an administrator for Cambodian (Khmer) Wikipedia, I thought you might be able to help this editor out by explaining things to them. If you don't have the time to do this, perhaps you could suggest someone who might be able to help. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Albeiror24! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]