On 22 April, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Gliese 581 e, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I've started a discussion of your radius charts here. I suspect they may constitute original research and in some cases may be misleading. Icalanise (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There probably is a good case for moving the planet/star articles to CoRoT because the scientific literature appears to be fairly consistent in this usage. For the satellite itself it is less clear, certainly the various mission websites and press releases are quite inconsistent. You're also up against people claiming that the Manual of Style tells us to avoid odd capitalisation schemes, whether it actually does or doesn't may or may not be another matter. Presumably we should be consistent whatever the decision. As you can see the idea of using CoRoT was shot down when I tried to move it before. Icalanise (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your thinking: the satellite and mission can stay COROT (there's enough inconsistency in the literature), but the planet and star articles should move to CoRoT (the relevant literature is quite consistent). I don't think those who would argue that Manual of Style has anything to say against this have a leg to stand on. — Aldaron • T/C 22:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you made an edit to the Alpha Centauri page asking for a source on the changes I made. Later in the paragraph, I listed two possible explanations for the confusion, one with an external source, the other that was mentioned elsewhere in wikipedia but for which I could not find a source. I'm new to editing so wondering if I could have structured this better when providing the one source I could find? MikeBz (talk) 21:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please confirm your request to be renamed at the Dutch Wikipedia? Please do so here and then notify us at w:nl:WP:HA. --Erwin (talk) 13:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed. — Aldaron • T/C 15:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. --Erwin (talk) 12:43, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read the section on the discussion of unknown radius of exoplanets. Possibly putting a question mark in the center of the circle would be good. Thanks, Marasama (talk) 23:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like that idea. Next time I update I'll experiment with it. — Aldaron • T/C 00:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on talk.174.3.98.236 (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which rule?174.3.98.236 (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RELATED — Aldaron • T/C 16:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to look at Dreugol system on NukeVac Wiki that NuclearVacuum made? You can even participate discussion about the article. First you have to create your account in order for you to have discussion. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 13:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BGG-FrontPage-2006-07.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my Edit without any explanation. Let's discuss it. What do you require in order to reach consensus? Question: why did you revert my edit in Invention? Zutam (talk

See the article's talk page. — Aldaron • T/C 11:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

in a Discussion re Invention.

• You can state there your comments.
• If you accept my contribution - you don't make me a favor, it's for article's sake.
• If you don't like it - you can amend my contribution as you like - the article is yours also.

--Zutam (talk) 15:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the article's talk page. — Aldaron • T/C 16:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you are listed as a Wikipedian associated with Harvard. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at schools in Boston and Cambridge (including Harvard), which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

If you live near Boston and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from the area who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.

If you're an experienced and active Wikipedian, you might be interested alternatively in becoming an Online Ambassador. The role of Online Ambassadors is to serve as mentors for students; it doesn't require any in-person outreach. Take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 21:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bit to Kepler-10b to get it eligible for Wikipedia:Did_you_know, and plan to expand it a bit further. James McBride (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-10b, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Kepler-10b is the first definitively confirmed rocky exoplanet? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aldaron.

I saw you made the pages for a lot of the Kepler discoveries. I was wondering if you could help me set up a few exoplanet ones that are redirects at the moment. Are you up to it? --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently attempting to bring the Abraham Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the Abraham Lincoln talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, as one of the major contributors of the article Solar flare I thought to write you. I'd like to have your opinion on this discussion. thanks in advance! --Dia^ (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd be very happy if you could help with this request. Particularly with the image which will soon be on wikipedia's mainpage as DYK. Thanks. bamse (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to know that a discussion regarding changes you recently reverted in File:Journeyman Editor Ribbon.png, File:Yeoman Editor Ribbon.png and File:Experienced and Established Editor.png is taking place at Wikipedia talk:Service awards#ribbons. – PartTimeGnome (talk | contribs) 21:20, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi there! Is there any chance this image could be updated to cover the rest of 2012? A reader has asked via our ticketing system if this is possible. Thanks! — Joseph Fox 00:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I hope to soon. A (now not so) recent update of the tool I use to make the my figures introduced quite a few bugs, and I'm struggling to fix them. — Aldaron • T/C 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have ensured that all transclusions to this page were updated. Would you please nominate the page for deletion with ((db-userreq))? Thanks.  Hazard-SJ  ✈  00:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldaron, I came across this edit and was wondering what you mean by "scientific reasoning". Is there an article that describes the distinction you're making, and the sense in which the two are often confused? Scientific reasoning redirects to Models of scientific inquiry which mentions that both deduction and induction are used in science. Is that what you mean, that they're different in that induction is part of scientific reasoning but not the whole? --Allen (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the exoplanet graph had been updated and wished to thank you for producing such a nice figure.CyrilleDunant (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

((NFPA 704)) has changed. You could use

((NFPA 704 diamond/old | Health=0 | Flammability=1 | Reactivity=0| Other=♥)) →

1

0

0

♥

to keep original intention. -DePiep (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Wikignome Award
		Thank you so much for all you do to make Wikipedia a better place! Your edits, no matter how small, are always appreciated :) Thank again! ~ Anastasia (talk) 16:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Aldaron • T/C 01:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please explain your revert (and always do so in the summary), thanks. 209.6.114.98 (talk) 14:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem: I see I wasn't following WP:ALSO. — Aldaron • T/C 19:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldaron! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:08, Tuesday, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

Hi, in your plot I noted the green dot far to the right. If it is not an error, which star is that? It is so far away from the other transit planets that it should get a label I think. --mfb (talk) 14:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance this figure will be updated soon? Thanks! --MaEve (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aldaron. Are you taking part in the GA review of this article? If so, please introduce yourself on the review page and explain what your issue is. SpinningSpark 12:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how you did it, but the singular concatenated symbol "fi" was used instead of plain-text "fi" with this edit on Lissajous orbit, and not fixed until today (8.5 years later!). It broke (well, created what I thought was an exception to/a bug in) my script, so I thought I'd let you know to try to keep it from happening.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I have no idea how I did that. (More disturbing is that, 8.5 years later, I have hardly any idea what a Lissajous orbit is.) — Aldaron • T/C 13:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GJ 1214 and Template:Gliese 758 have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 61 Virginis d is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/61 Virginis d until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jp×g 20:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]