This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article San Giacomo Scossacavalli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Alessandro, I hope you are good. I would kindly ask you if you can give your opinion here [[1]]. It is a talk about Canova ethnicity/nationality. The talk got a bit tumultuous, so a user asked for a third opinion, and I decided to give mine. Since you are experienced, it would be a pleasure if you join the talk :)--Walter J. Rotelmayer (talk) 09:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

The article San Giacomo Scossacavalli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:San Giacomo Scossacavalli for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Alessandro57. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for San Giacomo Scossacavalli at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 15:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Alessandro57. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Corsican Guard at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!  – Corinne (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Alessandro57 -- I have finished copy-editing Corsican Guard. There are two things I want to ask you about so that I can make the sentences clearer:

1) In the first paragraph in the section Corsican Guard#Origin and formation of the Corsican Guard you have this phrase:

• during the 15th century Corsicans began to settle in Senese and Latial Maremma

I looked in both the Siena article and the Lazio article and I wonder whether your adjective forms are correct. In the Siena article I saw "Sienese" as the adjective, not "Senese". In the Lazio article I did see "Latium" as an alternate name for Lazio, but the adjective "Latial" appears nowhere in the article. When I did a search for "Latial" to find anything at all in WP with that term, I found only a reference to an ancient area of Latium that existed in B.C. times. Because of that, I'm wondering whether "Latial" is really the correct adjective for relatively modern Lazio/Latium.

2) In that same paragraph is the following sentence:

• Originally, the Corsicans were only able to find humble jobs in the city and its surroundings, mostly in the areas of sheep breeding and wine trading (the island's wines were much sought after in that period), the only exceptions being a career in the church, as a servant in the Vatican palaces or as a soldier of the Pope or some of the Roman baroni; consequently, they did not become well integrated in Roman society.

Besides the fact that good writing calls for "parallel structure" – that is, that in a list of items in a sentence, the items are all of the same grammatical structure and type – and you don't have that here:

• a career in the church
• a servant in the Vatican palaces
• a soldier of the Pope or some of the Roman baroni

All three are noun phrases, but the second and third are people while the first is not. But besides that, it is not clear whether "as a servant in the Vatican palaces or as a soldier of the Pope or some of the Roman baroni" are two examples of "a career in the church" or are two additional and separate examples of exceptions to occupations such as sheep breeding and wine trading. Your answer will tell me how to make this sentence clearer. If they are two examples of "a career in the church", then "a soldier of...some of the Roman baroni" wouldn't fit, would it?  – Corinne (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Hallo @Corinne:, and thanks for copyediting! About your points:

• Nice catch! I think that the adjectives are "lazial" and sienese;

• The sentences refer to three different professions:
  • Priest
  • Servant
  • Soldier

maybe one could write: "the only exceptions being: a career in the church; as a servant in the Vatican palaces; or as a soldier of the Pope or some of the Roman baroni" but I think that this is an Italian construction... Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 17:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

How about changing "a career in the church" to "a priest"? "...: as a priest, a servant in the Vatican palaces, or a soldier in the employ of the Pope or the Roman baroni". This way, you avoid having to repeat "as".  – Corinne (talk) 02:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC) Were there other careers in the church besides starting out as a priest and working one's way up? I suppose two other careers in the church were "a servant in the Vatican palaces" and "a soldier for/in the employ of the Pope". It's too bad we can't just include all these in careers in the church. The only thing that doesn't fit is "a soldier for/in the employ of...the Roman baroni".  – Corinne (talk) 02:28, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes @Corinne:, I think that "a priest" is correct, being the starting point of a career in the church, exactly like a servant and a soldier are also the starting points of other type of careers. Alex2006 (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

There is a requested move at Talk:Ayşe Hafsa Sultan#Requested move 13 June 2016 on a page that you have edited in the past. You are invited to come to the talk page and give your input.  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  01:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey Alesandro, how are you doing my friend? :) Enjoying the splendid weather I assume? Btw, though you might have had already noticed; amongst the masses of socks who have been blocked in the past few days, Steverci has also been CU indeffed as a sock of a long-term sock abuser. My my, what a surprise. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

no pancetta no bacon and no parmigiano

only guanciale and pecorino

here the source: http://www.accademiaitalianacucina.it/it/content/spaghetti-alla-carbonara-alluso-di-roma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.38.72.98 (talk) 01:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you! I love roman history also btw! Cornersss (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Churches of Rome (rione Campo Marzio) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 16:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

YOU NEED TO READ THIS! AND THIS!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.40.168.81 (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

I replied to your comment on the talk page. I do not contest the facts, but the use of the sources and the actual translation. The current version of the article gives undue emphasis to the events, at least in its current format. Silvio1973 (talk) 12:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Cheetah (talk) 01:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from using unreliable sources on Armenia. Thanks, --Cheetah (talk) 01:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Alessandro57: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Doug Weller talk 12:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use ((subst:Season's Greetings)) to send this message

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, there is a user "Madreterra" changing continuously the page Italians by removing sources, without a reason. The sources actually confirm the intro but he/she denies it.--93.36.7.58 (talk) 07:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. In case you have not followed the relevant discussion, this user is not a vandal. That term refers to a specific type of user who causes damage on purpose. Please remember to WP:AGF. The user here is a student in a educational project trying to constructively contribute to Wikipedia. She is sadly hampered by poor grammar and vocabulary skills, due to being an ESL. A more constructive approach, rather than just revert her and calling her a vandal, would be to proofread her edits (some content is useful, and well referenced) and report mistakes she does on her talk page, so she can understand why were are unhappy with some of her edits. PS. On second thought, I now agree with you that the crude oil part is nonsense and there is little to rescue from the source cited, so I am not going to restore anything there again. But I stand by my earlier comments - the errors you spotted are the result of poor English skills, not intentional vandalism. I pointed several examples on her talk page, feel free to add more. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I noticed you edit a lot of Italian/geography articles from WikiProject: Italy I've been working on improving Lago di Bientina a large (now-drained) lake in Tuscany, but I'm still pretty new to Wikipedia and am not exactly confident in my work. It started out as one sentence and I've added a lot over the last few days. If you could take a look and give me some guidance, tips, or pointers, that would be awesome, I'd really appreciate it! Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Districts of Rome, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

I will enrich you a bit:  ;-)

1. "myself" in "I felt myself enriched" is completely unnecessary.
2. "smaller vocabulary" is much more common than "narrower vocabulary"

PS. The Simple English Wikipedia doesn't seem like a good alternative to me.
Vikom (talk) 15:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Easter bread, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glaze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Pizza di Pasqua.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Sounds delicious!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Girth Summit)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 10:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

@Girth Summit:, Thanks a lot for your great review, which removed my Italian construction from the prose! Yes, it really is! For us, there is no Easter without eating this pizza at Sunday morning, together with boiled eggs, corallina salami and chocolate eggs. Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

No problem - let me know if you ever need a hand with editing prose with future articles, I'd be happy to run happy to lend a hand. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 10:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

@Girth Summit:, thanks, I will do it! I did a small correction to an edit of yours to reinstate what the source meant (growth during baking: actually this pizza grows also in the oven). Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 10:40, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I misunderstood that bit, thanks for fixing. Good luck with the DYK :) GirthSummit _(blether) 10:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

On 8 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pizza di Pasqua, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the pizza di Pasqua used to be blessed at the local church before being eaten at breakfast on Easter morning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pizza di Pasqua. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

On 4 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tarzan of Manisa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Tarzan of Manisa planted thousands of trees on Mount Sipylus in Turkey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tarzan of Manisa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Please check the last question I left for you on the article of Talk:Metropolitan cities of Italy. It concerns election of the metropolitan council in these cities, which remains very unclear to me. --Criticalthinker (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I guess what I'm asking is what is the electoral system for metropolitan cities as it relates to electing the metropolitan councils? I've read the law on this, and it seems the description starts at around paragraph 27, but it is very confusing. If there is some easier way to describe the electoral process, that would be great to know. It sounds like there are competing lists, but beyond that it is very confusing, with each municipality getting so many seats, etc. I am not clear on whether each constituency (in this case, the municipalities) has a list, or if there is an overall list for the whole metropolitan city for each party. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Criticalthinker: sorry for the delayed answer, but I have limited access to Wikipedia in these days. You are right, the whole election process is not clear, and information is contradictory. In the next days I will try to find some more source, although the law should be the main source in this case. Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 06:47, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of 1766 Istanbul earthquake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MIDI (talk) 14:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nom Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

There is a discussion that might interest you.[2] --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you reverted my edit. I restored it by adding a ref that confirms the island belongs to the southeast Dodecanese, from the official Government website. I don't know why you reverted, it's not a controversial thing. Why did you disagree with this? 2A02:214C:8208:C200:2C6E:AE62:7548:70D6 (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

I reverted you because you removed an info to add another one, using the original source. Of course Kastelorizo is an island belonging to the dodecanese, but unlike all the other ones, belongs to the eastern Mediterranean Sea. I think that we can put both the info in the same sentence. Alex2006 (talk) 19:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Done. Alex2006 (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

On 21 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1766 Istanbul earthquake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1766 Istanbul earthquake claimed 4,000 victims, 880 of them in the city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1766 Istanbul earthquake. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Terebinth of Nero at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Alessandro57

Thank you for creating Ager Vaticanus.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice new article! Please consider taking it over and filing a WP:DYK so that it can appear on the front page of wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Insertcleverphrasehere)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 10:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vatican City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aventine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

On 18 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Terebinth of Nero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Terebinth of Nero in Rome got its name from a species of tree that traditionally shaded Saint Peter's tomb? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Terebinth of Nero. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

On 19 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meta Romuli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pope Alexander VI granted a plenary indulgence to those willing to work on the demolition of the Meta Romuli? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meta Romuli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

For creating Borgo Vecchio (Rome), have a brownie, you deserve it! Keep up the good work, its quite the good page. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

On 1 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crepereia Tryphaena, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Crepereia Tryphaena's doll (pictured) had its own kit, comprising several jewels, a wooden casket, two silver mirrors, and two tiny bone combs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crepereia Tryphaena. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 06:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 00:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Bargello (Middle Ages), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Borgo Vecchio (Rome) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 11:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Bargello (Middle Ages), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

buidhe 19:35, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Prego! A lovely article about a unique find. With more time I'll try to expand and tweak it a little. Cheers! Shir-El too 09:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Life-imitating-art-imitating...Wikipedia? :) I'm editing around Coronavirus at the moment, but will look up the it/wiki sources too. Cheers! Shir-El too 11:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

On 8 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Borgo Nuovo (Rome), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Italian Renaissance artist Raphael died in 1520 in his palace on the now demolished Borgo Nuovo (pictured) in Rome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Borgo Nuovo (Rome). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Precious

ancient Rome

Thank you for quality articles about the history of Rome, such as Borgo Nuovo (Rome), San Giacomo Scossacavalli, Palazzo Rusticucci-Accoramboni and Terebinth of Nero, for Cuisine of Corsica, for support in many languages, from 2006, - Alessandro, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2340 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

On 14 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ager Vaticanus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Ager Vaticanus alluvial plain in Rome was known for its unhealthy climate and bad wine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ager Vaticanus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

On 17 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Borgo Vecchio (Rome), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the demolished Borgo Vecchio in Rome may have been the road down which Christian martyrs walked when going to the Circus of Nero to be executed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Borgo Vecchio (Rome). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

On 18 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Santa Maria della Purità (Rome), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the church of Santa Maria della Purità in Rome was managed by caudatari, priests whose main task was to carry the trains of the pope or cardinals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Santa Maria della Purità (Rome). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Borgo Nuovo (Rome) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Neoclassical

Borgo Vecchio (Rome) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Neoclassical

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Piazza Scossacavalli at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Via Giulia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alessandro Farnese, Dauphin, Campo dei Fiori and Francesco Salviati

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

On 7 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Piazza Scossacavalli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Piazza Scossacavalli in Rome kept its cinquecento atmosphere for nearly 400 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piazza Scossacavalli. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

--valereee (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi there dear Alessandro57,

I hope I'm replying in the proper manner...

Regarding the edit I made at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strongyli_Megistis , thank you for notifying me for not setting an edit summary. As I am quite new to the Wikipedia Editing world, I think I might have forgotten to state my edit. On any other edits i've made so far, I do not think i've left that behind and I'll make sure to not to on any new ones.

I will proceed in remaking the particular edit and completing the Edit Summary field.

Again many thanks,

Regards N — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dikaion Nika (talk • contribs) 22:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Dear Alex2006,

I am afraid this is not a valid argument. The universal name of the island as stated in all naval and other official maps is that of a Greek name. In this English language article it is the Greek name in Latin writing. Any other name in any other language, or any other translation of the name in any other language is irrelevant and not only it does not contribute as information, but it misleads from the truthful name, as it implies that there is/are other official names of the island(s). In 2019 Greece had 21,8 million visitors from all around the world. Coming form various countries using many different languages, they could have written their own name or translation of the island in the article. I think that would confuse matters further more. If Turkish tourists visit Greek islands and have useful conversations between them, that should not be a reason of misleading the rest of the world. They can still have conversations with the official names as well.

On the 2nd argument. I am afraid your statement is inaccurate historically. This island or any other part of Greece was never Turkish. It was under the occupation of the Ottoman Empire 200 years ago. There is a major difference between modern Turkey and the Ottoman empire. To name a major one, Ottoman names and writing were not in Latin character but in Perso-Arabic script written from right to left. Throughout history many islands in the broader region, had been under foreign occupation from various occupants neighbour to Greece or not. To name a few countries only from the past 500 years without reference to antiquity: Russia, England, France, Spain, Italy. If there are all these languages present in articles regarding current names, again that would be misinformative and create more confusion for the public. If the Turkish name refers to a historical name recorded at some point in history then the historical sources and particularly the chronological date should be mentioned. Stating that the current name of the island is other than its official name, not only does it create confusion on the education of the public, but it provides an opening for conflict and further dispute on a region that has been clearly and officially defined.

I will start a new section open for discussion on the subject. What is the procedure of approval or disapproval of an edit? And who decides on an edit of an article? It is not of my intention to start an edit war, just to clarify information and avoid unnecessary claims.

Best Regards, Dikaion Nika Dikaion Nika (talk) 21:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Please read the question I left for you at Talk:Metropolitan cities of Italy. Thank you. --Criticalthinker (talk) 12:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

I left you a follow-up question, as there was a misunderstanding. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Use this as an example (http://www.provincia.cagliari.it/ProvinciaCa/resources/cms/documents/ElezioniConsiglioMetropolitano23ott2016-CalcoloIndPonderaz.pdf). How is the .780 redistributed among the remaining bands? --Criticalthinker (talk) 04:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

OK, tomorrow I will try to understand il busillis :-) Alex2006 (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for all of your help so that I could rewrite the Metropolitan Cities of Italy page on the English-language wikipedia so that it made sense and was covered in detail. My next project is to add a section to the Elections in Italy article describing the local electoral system for local (comune) elections in Italy. But, again, trying to translate the source material for this in English has been difficult and the existing information on local elections pages for Italy aren't that clear. I found the law that deals with local elections (for cities over 15,000); it is in Articles 72 & 73, specifically. I'm confused about a few things:

1. The law appears to say that if the mayoral candidate wins in the first round, and the group of lists connected to him received at least 40% of the vote, then that group of lists automatically gets 60% of the seats, correct? And then it says that if the mayoral candidate wins in the second round without his connected lists having gotten the 60% of the seats in the first round, that this group of lists are still awarded the 60% of the seats in the second round, correct? And then finally, that in either case, the lists (over 3%) who didn't receive the 60% of the seats then divides the remaining seats amongst themselves proportionally, correct?

I guess a more simple way to phrase this is does the winning list - so long as it gets at least 40% of the vote - connected to the winning mayoral candidate alway get 60% of the seats? What happens if a group of lists wins more than 60% of the vote? Is everything then done proportionally? I guess I'm confused by the results of the most recent municipal election in Turin in which the Five Star list only got 31% of the vote in the city council race vs. 42% for the center-left list, but still won the majority bonus. Is it only because Five Star's mayoral candidate won a majority vote in the second round?

2. Finally, going back to the issues of the metropolitan cities and provinces, is the indice di ponderazione figure how much each elector's (consiglieri e sindaco) vote is worth? So, in this example of an election is Venice in 2015, a mayor and city councillor's single vote from the comune of Venice (32 consiglieri e sindaco) is actually worth 932 votes?

You can post a reply to this on my talked page, if you'd like, or you can respond, here. If I was not clear with my questions, feel free to ask me to clarify. Grazie! --Criticalthinker (talk) 10:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Please check back with the follow-up question I left when you can. --Criticalthinker (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Hallo CriticalThinker, sorry but this period has been really turbulent for me. Possibly at the end of next week I will breath a little bit...Thanks! Alex2006 (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Palazzo del Governatore di Borgo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

On 26 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Palazzo del Governatore di Borgo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Palazzo del Governatore di Borgo in Rome was one of the first buildings to display architect Antonio da Sangallo the Younger's artistic maturity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palazzo del Governatore di Borgo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Sicarius redirects to a page about "a splinter group of the Jewish Zealots". Sica is the page about the ancient Roman knife. You might want to put a little more thought into your reverts [[3]] and a little more research into whether an edit is 'constructive' or not. 208.85.164.43 (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

...that Julius II presented himself as the "Liberator of Italy". Can you restore my previous edit? It left everything as it was except making it clear that this happened in Rome 1513 and not Mantua 1512 (Medici not yet restored at that point). The source is the book of Marina Formica. Barjimoa (talk) 08:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Don't worry, no problem! BTW, since you are the project about Rome here...can you jump at it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussione:Italici There are a number of changes I proposed to that article and I wanted to know what you think as well. Also, i think we can co-operate on many articles since our area of interest appears to be the same! Barjimoa (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Alessandro57. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Via Giulia at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 01:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Alessandro57, as it was not your Request at WP:GOCER, you should not have deleted it. At a minimum, you owed me the courtesy of a ping and a query as to whether I thought it should still go ahead, as it was my request and all copyedits are not equal. In fact, there are a few passages that I think need work, but what's done is done. Just remember, you have no right to remove requests from that page that you did not make. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Now that the GOCE copyedit has been completed, you will want to work on the "clarification needed" templates that the editor added to the article, since the DYK review will not be able to conclude while they are still active. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

• On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
• The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
  • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
  • a rich-text visual editing option, and
  • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

– PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of San Michele Arcangelo ai Corridori di Borgo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

On 25 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article San Michele Arcangelo ai Corridori di Borgo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a fresco depicting the Nursing Madonna was found in the churchyard of San Michele Arcangelo ai Corridori di Borgo in Rome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/San Michele Arcangelo ai Corridori di Borgo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

On 2 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article San Filippo Neri in Via Giulia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the saint to whom the church of San Filippo Neri in Via Giulia in Rome was originally dedicated was the patron of people with gout? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/San Filippo Neri in Via Giulia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Via Giulia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)