On 28 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Photios of Korytsa, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although the Greek Orthodox bishop of Korçë, Photios, took initiatives for the promotion of the local education, he was assassinated in 1906 for not supporting Albanian cultural activity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Photios of Korytsa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poliçan, Gjirokastër, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in Poliçan, southern Albania, as well as in the rest of the Pogoni region, polyphonic singing is a local tradition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poliçan, Gjirokastër. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Massacre of Phocaea, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the June 1914 attack against the Ottoman Greeks of Phocaea, Turkey, as part of the Ottoman policy of ethnic cleansing, closely resembled similar operations against Armenians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Massacre of Phocaea. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eritha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eritha, one of the most significant priestesses in Mycenaean Pylos in c. 1200 BC, was involved in a dispute over the legal status of her religious holdings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eritha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kyra Vassiliki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kyra Vassiliki (pictured), wife of the Ottoman ruler, Ali Pasha, was a member of the Greek patriotic organization, Filiki Eteria? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dormition of the Theotokos Church, Labovë e Kryqit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Dormition of the Theotokos Church (pictured) in Labovë e Kryqit, founded by Emperor Justinian I, is one of the most representative examples of Byzantine architecture still standing in Albania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dormition of the Theotokos Church, Labovë e Kryqit. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Military of Mycenaean Greece, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the armies of Mycenaean Greece, chariots were initially used as fighting vehicles, but by the 13th century BC their role was probably limited to battlefield transport? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Military of Mycenaean Greece. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Northern Epirote Declaration of Independence for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] Alex Shih^Talk 12:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] — Maile (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] — Maile (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply] Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting the latest developments to this article, some users would like to change the name to Byzantines claiming that there is no connection to Greeks and placing POV tags. The same users have been reverted lately various times due to POV pushing. Thanks for your latest additions though. Othon I (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you blocking me from adding informations on Pileus ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonDardan (talk • contribs) 13:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Codex Beratinus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarandë, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am trying to promote the Battle of Sarantaporo to GA, so I wanted to ask whether you scanned the actual medal or an image of it? If its the latter can you clarify the source?--Catlemur (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know you've edited on the Eleni Foureira article about how she is Greek not Albanian, but now I have an editor misunderstanding policy and trying to tell me policy says she is Albanian. Just was wondering if you could back me up in explaining this since I see your comments on the talk page explaining how policy shows she should be looked at as Greek. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:42, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it's been cleared up. But the vandalism problem on Foureira's article regarding her nationality is still a major issue. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Καλησπέρα, Γιατί η αλλαγή; Από την Αλβανία είναι η κοπέλα, και η ίδια πήγε τώρα στην Αλβανία και είπε "Είμαι περήφανη που είμαι Αλβανίδα". Onoufrios d (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Δεν βλέπω γιατί αυτό και μόνο μπορεί να επηρεάσει την εθνικότητα του προσώπου.Alexikoua (talk) 11:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Forty Saints Monastery, Sarandë at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexikoua, there has been a new check made, and close paraphrasing/copyvio issues still persist. Please see the nomination page, and note that this is one example; you'll need to check for others as well. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An additional check was made, and I'm afraid there is still close paraphrasing in the article. It's important that you deal with it all, and do so soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Souliotes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mani and Olympus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pelion (Chaonia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyricum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to pay your attention to this diff and this statistics link. This editor (Rolandi+) argued about the difference between Bua and Buia although sources like this (Institutul de Istorie și Arheologie "A.D. Xenopol." (1987). Anuarul Institutului de Istorie și Arheologie "A.D. Xenopol.". ... Familiei Buia (Bua)...) say they are the same. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simply nonsense. Rolandi +sockfarm are just short-term drive by SPAs.Alexikoua (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikaia, Illyria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parthenos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user:Alexikoua,

in regards to the addition of the name in Albanian language at the Markos Botsaris article lead section, I consider it is within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines but, still I shall review again the policies as per your suggestion and I would kindly like to discuss with you back again.

In regards to the "The Greek–Albanian dictionary" section of the same article, there it is mentioned (third sentence): "...not in alphabetical order, and the Albanian words on the right, written in Greek letters." My edit was to remove the part "written in Greek letters". As I wrote to my explanation of the edit, in the Albanian part of the manuscript you can find the letter "ë" which is not part of the Greek alphabet but rather part of Albanian alphabet. So definitely the Albanian part is not written in Greek letters; such consideration is not supported and should be removed from the article. Or at least it should be re-written correctly clarifying that only the Greek part of the manuscript is written in Greek letters. Could you please kindly explain your revert of my edit at this part?

Thank You! Bcon4rit (talk) 09:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution. About introduction in biographies see: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Context: The opening paragraph should usually provide context for the activities that made the person notable. In most modern-day cases this will be the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, or if the person is notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable.

Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability.Alexikoua (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexikoua: Hello Alexikoua. I have left a message on your Wikimedia Commons talk page. Have you seen it? Demetrios1993 (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illyrians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dardania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexi! Thanks for creating the article. I've made some copyedits and corrections to the references, and tagged a few spots that are unclear/problematic (unfortunately I don't have the time to go through the sources myself). Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Constantine, good job.Alexikoua (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottoman Greece, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amantia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pliny.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with changing the importance classification? Several cities are classified as TOP in WikiProject Albania and Vlorë is one of the top tier cities in Albania. The city has special importance because it is the city of the declaration of independence, the first capital of Albania, and represents a very important part of Albania ... so why not? The template is meant for the participants of WikiProject so I don't see whats your problem with that.

On the other hand, this is an easily categorized article in class C. Therefore I wanted to hear the reasons for returning to Start. Wikipedia is very clear in scaling categories.Bes-ARTTalk 22:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberation Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your work on many articles about Greece and Orthodoxy. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 02:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] Doug Weller talk 14:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't translate The state represented by 'Kemara' in the list of hosts had two centres, Himarre andBorsh, both probably fortified, and farther north the Amantes hadstrong points at Kanine and at their political centre, Ploce.42 Inland,however, in central Epirus the only fortified places were in the plain ofIoannina, the centre of the Molossian state.Thus the north-west Greek-speaking tribes were at a half-way stage economically and politically, retaining the vigour of a tribal society andreaching out in a typically Greek manner towards a larger politicalorganization. to They spoke a northwestern Greek dialect. It's a SYNTH use of bibliography and ignores the bibliographical discussion by extrapolating the view of one particular author, whose theory is already being discussed in the article.--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is clear that "the north-west Greek-speaking tribes" refer to the ones mentioned in the previous paragraph, i.e. Amantes were one of them.Alexikoua (talk)

There is no WP:SYNTH. SYNTH involves combining two or more sources, by definition. Maleschreiber, your behavior is bordering on bad faith and harassment. This has to stop, and it will, one way or another. Khirurg (talk) 04:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SYNTH: Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Similarly, do not combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. If you're going to argue about SYNTH, make sure to quote it correctly. Alexikoua is inferring from the same source something that is not mentioned explicitly. They are also adding WP:UNDUE material because Hammond is already being discussed in the article. It is Hammond's opinion that this population was Greek-speaking and that is explicitly mentioned in Hammond (1989) (not in Hammond's chapter in the CAH), but Hammond who is in the minority can't be readded in wikivoice (with a wrong citation) in order to bypass every other source and imply that almost every source which was published after 1990 considers them to be Illyrians, but also accepts that they were Greek-speaking - Hammond's theory. It's a problem of methodology to repeatedly highlight the one particular author with whom you agree, but whose corpus of works was written 40-60 years ago and is considered outdated today because we have 6 other sources written in the 21st century which don't reach the same conclusions as well as many others from his era which disagree with him.

I'm trying to highlight how editing should function in terms of how bibliographical discussions are presented, but if you think that this is "harrassment", do what feels best for you and file a report and then everyone's editing history will be scrutinized. I think that everyone's activity should be discussed on AE, the administration board which has really improved the Balkan topic area with its decisions.--Maleschreiber (talk) 14:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the part about combining multiple sources? Now cut it out with the WP:BULLYING and WP:HARASSMENT or you will end up defending yourself at AE. Khirurg (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit today included a quote from a book by N.G.L. Hammond. The quote included misspellings and an odd system of spacing and punctuation. Does the quoted material appear this way in the book? Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. It appears that copy-pasting text directly from googlebooks snippets sucks in this case.Alexikoua (talk) 17:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Ancient Greece topics ([1][2]). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.--Lorik17 (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blatantly irrelevant warning. Macedonian (talk) 20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing? Drmies is me. Not you. Drmies (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Drmies: Sorry, I was going to fix this immediately but it was instantly removed.Alexikoua (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK--thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Proto-Greek language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aulon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Listen, basically, you should never cite WP:TROLL anywhere on Wikipedia, really for any reason, not to mention against editors in good standing involved in a discussion of an WP:ACDS matter. (For actual "trolls" WP:DENY is preferred.) So, please moderate your tone from now own, as this behaviour isn't conducive to a collaborative environment, and, may eventually result in sanctions. Thanks! El_C 15:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dassaretae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollodorus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pashalik of Yanina, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexikoua. Can I call you Alex? Alexi? Anyway, I'm here to bring to your attention that this DYK hook about a temple probably inspiring the design of India's Parliament House, which you reviewed in 2015, might not have been accurately cited. I've listed out my concerns at Parliament House's talk page. I hope you'll have a look at them. Cheers and kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ^{converse | fings wot i hav dun} 07:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, off course. I'm looking at the July 2015 version [[3]] now, but unfortunately one of the correspodent inlines appears now unavailable.~. [[4]].Alexikoua (talk) 10:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zvërnec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aromanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow MOS, in placement of images. --2603:7000:2143:8500:D8AB:DC6:F5AB:A9F1 (talk) 07:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the order of the discussion of people is A, B - then you follow that order in the placement of images. Not the reverse - as you did repeatedly. Also, beyond that, we want to avoid sandwiching text between images -- as you have now done. Please follow the MOS for images. --2603:7000:2143:8500:3D36:6921:7E85:C984 (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good reason to fix the order per chronological sequence. Good catch!Alexikoua (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I know how do the sources provided fail wp:HISTRS ? Zemertrimi (talk) 11:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reference you provided avoid to present their bibliography. That's a strong point for a work to fail wp:RS.Alexikoua (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xlibris is a self-publishing company. You probably didn't know that it's that sort of company, but we should all be a bit more careful when we see publishing houses with "exotic" names. --Maleschreiber (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article Refugees of the Greek Civil War needs a lot of work, as it is presently written from the Bulgarian-Slavo-Macedonian pov, based on (often consealed) slavo-macedonian sources. Thanks.--Skylax30 (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Devoll Municipality, Kardhiq and List of historic Greek countries and regions . This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--InNeed95 (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask the reason you have reverted a citation error back into the article? Please see the very red error message in the article and read Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text. As this is a noncontroversial technical fix, I'm going to revert back to my version so it no longer appears in the errors list. Thanks 89.241.33.89 (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are exceptions for gender-related issues, but I don't see any issue in the Eleni Foureira article that means we should suppress her birth name—although I agree from context that it is not her current legal name. If there's an extenuating circumstance, feel free to reply here if you want to discuss it away from the article's talk page. (Please ping me so I see the message.) —C.Fred (talk) 18:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Omonoia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding dispute discussion you have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Arvanites".The discussion is about the topic Arvanites.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Othon I (talk) 16:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexikoua, it 's been too long since we last met in WP. I am happy to see that you are still active. So, might I ask a favour? Article on EOKA is pretty good. It has some major drawbacks, but with little work, it could became a Good Article. How nice would be that? My understanding is that it needs an introduction (that s where I need your help- could you do it? I could try but I feel most editors think I am biased) Other drawbacks is the undue weight on section of "Foreign Office declassified documents and EOKA lawsuits against the British government". (this can be solved with a little goodwill) Also, the Legacy and Aftermath sections need expanding but I didn't find a real RS (I mean academic work that discuss the effect EOKA struggle had on Cypurs -TC, GC, leftists- or on global scale). That 's the biggest obstacle. Otherwise, we are close enough to getting GA status. Cheers! Cinadon36 07:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's great news to hear! It will be a pleasure to contribute together to upgrade it to GA. I'm already checking those issues.Alexikoua (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanx! Cinadon36 08:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,765 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexikoua!, I have seen your considerable edits on Ali Pasha, Pashalik of Yanina and related articles. I invite you to move discussion on Talk:Ali Pasha of Ioannina. Marmidukay (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aulon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am writing to inform you that a discussion regarding the content of the article Talk:Vurg#Lefter Talo has been taking place on its talk page, and it has reached a point where it seems necessary to bring it to the attention of the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. I wanted to give you a heads up since you have been involved in the discussion, [[5]] Thank You! RoyalHeritageAlb (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chaonians, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chaonians, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amantia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaonians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chora.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ceraunian Mountains, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexikoua, as you've maybe noticed, we're waiting for a response at Kos. Mind that your response could affect multiple articles, or you may dismiss your argument.

Cheers, - AlexBachmann (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ceraunian Mountains, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karaburun Peninsula.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand that edit summary. You are welcome to discuss the matter on the talk page or at WP:RSN. Drmies (talk) 17:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me if I may: I think it's a typo, he probably meant to say, "I don't see why...". Khirurg (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excactly.Alexikoua (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not introduce WP:FRINGE narrative by WP:CHERRYPICKING the sources like here [6] and [[here [7]. Misrepresenting what the source says is considered unconstructive editing. – Βατο (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thats exactly how Fleming reads. What's wrong about?Alexikoua (talk) 22:57, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Notis Botsaris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, you may participate in the talk page of "Markos Botsaris". Recently I added some (almost) unpublished archival material that may need interpretation. Skylax30 (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nishjan (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you can't follow wp:NOT. Just make a good use of the basic guidelines before posting false warnings again.Alexikoua (talk) 23:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I think about it, the opening to the atrocities section states “the heavy and rapid defeat of the Ottoman army prevented the safe evacuation of muslim civilians, making them a clear target for the invading armies of the Balkan League”, I think this alone clearly implies that the vast majority/almost all of the Ottoman muslim civilian deaths took place during the first Balkan war, or at least duirng the first war and interregnum between the First and second Balkan war SamuelLion1877 (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We should take into account all available scholarship in general. Simply depending on a specific quote and by ignoring all the rest constitutes wp:POV.Alexikoua (talk) 03:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf are you talking about? No I think all you had to say was “I personally disagree with these two accredited historians so I am going to continuously vandalize and disrupt the page First Balkan War by removing sourced content and massacres of ottoman civilians both of which are sourced by accredited western historians SamuelLion1877 (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely none of the sources and references we used in the article go against Wikipedia’s policies. You are a liar and a disruptive editor, the only thing they “go against” or “violate” is your own personal biased opinion. See the talk page on the Balkan Wars article. Me and user Khuriug both agreed it was best to leave the two articles as they were as the vast majority of these deaths took place during the first Balkan war or at least the interregnum between the first and second Balkan war, not the second as that hardly involved the ottomans.

Moreover, I like how you completely made a U turn on your position in the last 24 hours, your first complaint was that the atrocities section should be moved to the Balkan Wars article, they were, and immediately user Khirug rv it and eventually agreed with me after some discussion that they should be kept on First Balkan War. Now all of a sudden the sources are somehow not reliable because you didn’t get your way? Get over yourself SamuelLion1877 (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qeparo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ephyra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qeparo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ephyra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iaof2017 (talk) 13:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are an old editor here. Why are you ignoring the basic guidelines and behaving in nationalistic manner? This Illyrian maximalism lunacy by ignoring all available research has to stop.Alexikoua (talk) 12:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't cast aspersions, please, and don't falsify sources, because it is highly disruptive for Wikipedia. – Βατο (talk) 12:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the only one that's disruptive about partially interpreting scholarship is you. Those maximalist Illyrian nonsense will soon lead in restrictions.Alexikoua (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Τσέκαρε εδώ Talk:Georgios Kountouriotis D.S. Lioness (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Markos Botsaris has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jtrrs0 (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]