I've fixed it for you on the article. The problem was that you had left some broken links in it (you used "]" rather than "]]" in several places, including [[Whole Azerbaijan Popular Front Party|AXC] and [[Sabir Rustamkhanli]). When infoboxes have broken links in them, they display as above.

Also, there were some errors in the above (the MDHP did not receive 0.88% of the vote). I have corrected these too. Cheers, Number 57 10:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!

Alextheconservative (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No problem. If you have any other issues or questions, feel free to ask on my talkpage. Number 57 10:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will do! Thanks.

Alextheconservative (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just to let you know, you do not need to link or add colours to all parties. If (for example) ((Cook Islands Party/meta/shortname)) and ((Cook Islands Party/meta/color)) both exist, you can just enter the name "Cook Islands Party" in the party section and it automatically creates a shortened link and colour. See this edit, which removes them. Also, you got the colour for the Democratic Party wrong! Number 57 16:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, you can create new meta templates if the parties you're trying to add to infoboxes don't have them. However, this is only advisable if a party contested multiple elections, as otherwise it's just a bit of a waste of time. Cheers, Number 57 16:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How can you check if the party has one of those templates? Thanks.

Alextheconservative (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Type the party name then "/meta" (as per the link above) into the search bar, and any templates that exist should appear listed. Number 57 17:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, thanks. Alextheconservative (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Caymanian general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for all your work on this. Just a couple of other tips:

• For two-round presidential elections, there is general agreement that only the second round result should be shown (see e.g. 2017 French presidential election). You might find a few articles where that has been ignored, so feel free to fix them.
• ((Infobox legislative election)) is a relatively new infobox, which was developed as the old ((Infobox election)) wasn't good at handling multi-party parliamentary elections. Some articles have the old infobox because it was the only one available at the time, so if you are adding infoboxes to a series of articles that don't have them, you're also welcome to convert the original infoboxes to the newer style to maintain consistency throughout the article series.

Cheers, Number 57 16:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for following along behind me to correct any mistakes I made! Just to clarify, the ((Infobox legislative election)) should be used for legislative and parliamentary elections, while ((Infobox election)) should be used for presidential and party elections? Thanks for your help. Alextheconservative (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are no definitive rules, but IMO, ideally yes. And no problem at all. Cheers, Number 57 17:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. Alextheconservative (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It looks like Infobox legislative election cannot embed inside itself. However, one solution is to use the format I added to your sandbox - this has been used on Belgian and Colombian elections. Are you ok with this? Cheers, Number 57 13:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brilliant- that looks better than the original way I was trying to do it! Thanks for your help, Alextheconservative (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another tip – if you're struggling to find the leaders of parties from past elections, electionguide.org often has many of them (their database goes back to 1998). I managed to fill in about half the blanks on 2002 Moroccan general election from their website. Cheers, Number 57 14:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great, I'll have a look at the other elections. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To add separate dates for next/previous presidential/parliamentary elections, you add the next/previous bits into the relevant sections (like this). Cheers, Number 57 10:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great, thank you. Alextheconservative (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've edited the infobox code to allow you to go up to 35 parties. Cheers, Number 57 08:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great. Thanks for your help, Alextheconservative (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By the way, I noticed that didn't work on 1990 Brazilian legislative election, but I have just fixed a related template, that means all 35 rows can be used now. Cheers, Number 57 15:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great. That should come in handy in later articles too! Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 16:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By the way, I notice you've been sorting these infoboxes by seats. Usually we sort by percentages (to match results tables). Cheers, Number 57 16:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, I'll start doing it that way now. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 17:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1977 Moroccan general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmed Osman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1976 Liechtenstein Vaduz bypass referendum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bypass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1968 Paraguayan general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gustavo González.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1989 Paraguayan general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrés Rodríguez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of female leaders of British political parties, from its old location at User:Alextheconservative/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:43, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nathan2055: Thank you for notifying me. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 18:48, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of female leaders of British political parties, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just want to say: really good job with what you're adding to that page. It's appreciated. Valenciano (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Valenciano: Thank you! I've had a lot of time because of the lockdown. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1993 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick McLaughlin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1991 Nepalese legislative election

added a link pointing to Gajendra Narayan Singh

1994 Nepalese legislative election

added a link pointing to Gajendra Narayan Singh

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1921 Maltese general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Howard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Watson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:04, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Northern Ireland local elections, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gary Wilson and Alan Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I admire your adding images for House members. Larger delegation states, such as Texas, California, etc. may become unwieldy with the images, however. What do you think? —GoldRingChip 19:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Other lists for individual congressional districts, like this, have pictures for the delegates. I saw the page for Wyoming, another at-large district, and did the same for Vermont. Alextheconservative (talk) 19:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, the list of the individual districts do have the images. But that single congressional district you cite as an example has only 24 members, whereas List of United States Representatives from Texas has 283, List of United States Representatives from California has 381, and List of United States Representatives from New York has 1,458. That's a lot of images which may become cumbersome. —GoldRingChip 20:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure; I just thought the way it was laid out on the Wyoming page was the standard. Alextheconservative (talk) 07:23, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, it's the standard for the Districts, not for the lists of All reps. —GoldRingChip 16:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

However, now that I look at it, it's also the standard for the lists of all senators. It's just the Reps lists that don't have them. I guess it's because those reps lists are so long already. —GoldRingChip 16:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should I remove the images then or keep them? Alextheconservative (talk) 18:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why this edit? —GoldRingChip 16:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, I misread the Montana section on the page. I will revert it. Alextheconservative (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Blair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep up the great work, adding electoral histories! Alos, please see my edit here, which linked more directly to the potential election articles. Those will then redirect to the links you used, but someday some future editor might make the articles. Do you want to make the changes to the other district articles you've recently edited, or would you like me to do it? —GoldRingChip 14:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you make the changes please? Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 15:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Yes, done. —GoldRingChip 17:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Alextheconservative (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, do you have any idea for the sources of the Presidential election results in each of the districts? Alextheconservative (talk) 18:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, sorry. —GoldRingChip 18:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see this edit (and perhaps others like it). Instead of 1866 and 1867 United States House of Representatives elections#Idaho Territory, it should be 1866 United States House of Representatives election in Idaho Territory. Red links are OK for direct election links. Can you please change the links in this and other articles you're editing? —GoldRingChip 13:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, will do. I wasn't aware that red links were OK. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes… someday someone (possibly me!) will make the article or at least the redirect back to 1866 and 1867 United States House of Representatives elections, but it will be useful for later links to come back to it. —GoldRingChip 15:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, in some cases, when there is only a single election, the correct link would be XXXX United States House of Representatives election, not elections. That includes at-large districts or general ticket elections. I've changed it here, so you can see what I mean. —GoldRingChip 15:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would this be the same for the lists of representatives? Alextheconservative (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Which? Yes to my first point that red links are ok. Yes to my second point that sometimes there is a single election. —GoldRingChip 18:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was referring to the first point. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. And on the articles "List of United States Representatives from…" we only list the electoral history of how that member came into and out of office, but don't list all the re-elections (as we would with the congressional district articles). That also helps keep those articles from getting too bulky. —GoldRingChip 19:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, I'll start doing that. Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2011 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Graham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1989 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Shields.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1989 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Mulholland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freedom Alliance (UK) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom Alliance (UK) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

doktorb _words^deeds 23:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		A beer on me!
		For all your hard work compiling high standard, local election articles JW 1961 Talk 20:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Joseywales1961: Thank you! Alextheconservative (talk) 06:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I saw that you submitted the overall results table on 2021 Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council election. Do you have a source for those figures for total votes/percentage changes (which I think are all changes since 2016), or did you calculate them yourself? I can't find them listed on Walsall Council's website. (I'm also not sure if figures on turnout percentage, spoiled ballots, etc are available anywhere.)

I noticed that the figures for the total seats changes in your table are different from those on the council results page:

• Council page [1] says CON 37 (+5)
• Your table says CON 32 (+5)

I would add that walsall.gov.uk page as a reference for the table - except that it only includes the seat numbers, so can't be used as a source for the percentage changes. Do you know of a source that covers all the figures in the table? --Nick R^Talk 12:46, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nick R: Hi, I noticed on other pages that they were comparing the results to 2019, so that's what I did. As for the CON 32, that was my mistake; I was typing the figures in excel, and copied over the before seats rather than after. I used this for the seats after, and this for the seats before (linked to on the Walsall council website). Thanks, Alextheconservative (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 Northern Ireland local elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Simpson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Saint Kitts and Nevis general election, 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:34, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

borgir SixtyBrace (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition election results, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For updating List of notorious markets. Thanks! Elli (talk | contribs) 04:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Alextheconservative (talk) 09:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Backbench Business Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition election results, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 11:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Home Affairs Select Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Morris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just an FYI (mostly to potentially stop you wasting your time), as far as I recall, every time a parish council election article has gone to AfD, it has resulted in deletion. The elections are just too low level to be notable (especially as so many are uncontested). Cheers, Number 57 20:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I did fear that may be the case, which is why I combined all parishes of a district into one article. I'll leave it for a while to see if any AfD nominations are made. Thank you, Alextheconservative (talk) 07:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

you have all these userboxes about the queen. but she's dead, you made the first "was" edit (that's how I found you) so you know this Voidify (talk) 08:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On that subject you're against Communism in theory but pro democracy. You're aware the end goal of Communism is a global democracy right? Democracy is communism, not just in theory but in practice. 2601:5CC:4700:CB6:AAA1:59FF:FE13:25FA (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One can be against something but still want it to be legal. Alextheconservative (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This dude is pretty neat (for a conservative) Profavi1 (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Endorsements for the the 2022 Conservative Party leadership election (UK) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § Endorsements for the the 2022 Conservative Party leadership election (UK) until a consensus is reached. Randi Moth (talk) 19:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petitions Committee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Benton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Mid Bedfordshire by-election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Mid Bedfordshire by-election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LukeSurl ^t c 11:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Query for you has been left at Talk:2023 Mansfield District Council election. Thx. 82.13.47.210 (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have no objection in principle to including the bye-elections provided you commit to keeping it maintained. But you must cite WP:RSs: your personal (I assume?) website at andrewteale.me.uk is not acceptable. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am happy to update the local elections for the articles as I have been for the past 2 years. However, I can assure you I am not the Andrew Teale who owns the website. Mr Teale runs the Local Elections Archive Project, an essential tool given that most of the original returns are difficult if not impossible to find on council websites. Alextheconservative (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First, my apologies for confusing Alex and Andrew. I will not revert your change again. But FYI, I have opened an informal RFC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom#andrewteale.me.uk to ask whether it is a wp:reliable source or does it fall foul of WP:Self published source. You may wish to contribute. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]