This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | ← | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | Archive 76 | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | → | Archive 80 |
Hello Alison. As you have helped me with this kind of question in the past I am wondering if this edit meets the criteria for deleting. If not no worries. Thanks for your time and have a nice weekend On wiki and Off. MarnetteD | Talk 16:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Based on their latest comments on their talk page, I'm about to head to WP:ANI. Any reason why I shouldn't? --NeilN talk to me 17:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Requesting review of EatsShootsAndLeaves block of Flyer22. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 17:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Alison. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Irish laughter
Thank you for quality contributions to articles on feminism and Ireland, among many others, for protecting child protection, protecting a user page and acting as a messenger, for "nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to hide", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (30 April 2007, - the first ever, "with the lilt of Irish laughter", 27 October 2008, 14 February 2009, 17 January 2011)!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Alison, I noticed your kind edit summary toward new user on Diethylstilbestrol page. Just wanted to leave you a quick note to say your kindness was refreshing. It seems most editors would have just called that vandalism and not bothered to take a few moments to explain. It’s nice to see some kindness on WP. --BoboMeowCat (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi Allie, did you happen to notice this edit from LightandDark2000? He appears to add forged commentary from you, refactored Loriendrew's comment, and deleted my comment entirely. I do think we need to get to the bottom of whether or not these accounts are actually related, but his technique is bizarre. For some backstory, I accused this user of being a sock of Brightify/HoshiNoKaabii2000, since their name seemed to me to be a not-so-clever portmanteau of both accounts. I recanted, because I didn't have enough data. The above edit doesn't look very good-faithy to me, and they previously did damage by merging various SPI reports. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks for joining the Challenge! It gives the whole Project a bit of much-needed clout! Thanks. For an article to be included, though, it needs to have been updated with at least 1,000 bytes of new text. You can find this info on the History of the Page tab, as you know. Interestingly, its the smaller wikis which are ploughing ahead, not the big guns. But, and I may be wrong, ploughs dig deeper preparing the ground for something green and good. It would be so good if all the wiki plough-persons met up at Wikimania! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)