Welcome...

Hello, AlligatorSky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there.

And remember, we don't bite...too hard ^^

Again, welcome! Stealthysis

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unorthodox (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unorthodox (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Give Me Everything (Pitbull song), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please provide a reliable source for all chart positions. Thanks. Yves (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's okay. Yes, it's updated now, so I've re-added it. Happy editing! Yves (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Andy4789 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding ((subst:Kitten)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with ((subst:Kittynap))

Love your username!! (Owl City?) ;) -andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 21:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Houdini (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of passing WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HoudiniFoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Foster the People has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:03, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheDrumsMoney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a ((helpme)) template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add ((bots|deny=DASHBot)) to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I appreciate your edits to List of number-one singles from the 2010s (UK) adding the new No. 1 single and updating some of the other text. However, the IP editor before you reverted my edits which *restored* the date rule found in the "Attention" box whenever editing the No. 1 list: The date must be the week-ending date, which is the Saturday after the Radio 1 chart show (i.e., Sunday + 6 days), per The Official Charts Company. Since the effort to revert the dates to chart-show dates is being led by IP editors, I have requested semi-protection for that page. Just remember, next time use the Saturday after the chart show. --RBBrittain (talk) 02:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. You have new messages at A Thousand Doors's talk page.
Message added 22:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Hi. Please don't add singles templates to album articles, they belong solely in singles articles. Thank you. SnapSnap 20:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, do not make singles templates for artists who have so few releases. Tinie Tempah's templates were fine.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For so regularly and diligently updating the lists of the 2010s UK Singles and Albums Charts number ones – your hard work hasn't gone unnoticed! A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 01:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I saw you have made a many contributions to the UK charts series of articles. I've recently created a similar series of articles of the U.S. singles charts by decade, which are built the same way the British ones are (by decade and with statistics).

These are the articles​​:

• List of Billboard number-one singles of the 1940s (U.S.)
• List of Billboard number-one singles during 1950–1958 (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles during 1958–1969 (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 1970s (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 1980s (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 1990s (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2000s (U.S.)
• List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.)

Unfortunately, there are some Wikipedians whom oppose keeping these articles around, claiming that they are essentially a duplication of information which already exists in other articles (namely, the extended articles covering individual years in the U.S. singles chart) and therefore they are in their opinion redundant – even though in my opinion, these articles present the chart lists more effectively (through sortable lists with reduced redundant data) and contain statistics by decade which does not exist elsewhere on Wikipedia. Despite this opposition, so far three of these articles have ​​survived individual AfDs. Nevertheless, according to this current ongoing deletion review it seems that very soon another bigger AfD is going to be held in which the fate of ALL these articles is going to be determined in a voting. I myself believe that these articles have a lot of potential and could be further expanded/developed. Nevertheless, if this potential would not be demonstrated soon enough, I fear the outcome of the upcoming voting, knowing that many Wikipedians might not see the value in such a series and/or its potential to be further expanded/developed.

Because you have had a lot of experience in developing the British charts articles, I asume you might have some good insights on how to expanding this series of articles as well. I would appreciate any help you would be able to provide in expanding/developing this series of articles.

Thanks in advance. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:StooShe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Night of the Big Wind _talk 11:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Nostalgia, Ultra, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gym Class Heroes discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Stop adding un-sourced positions.
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 21:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In January 2012, Del Rey revealed that she recently bought back the rights to her 2010 album Lana Del Ray A.K.A. Lizzy Grant and will re-release it in the Summer of 2012 under Interscope Records and Polydor.[48]

This is incorrect her previous producer and previous label have both said Grant and her management bought the rights to the album in April 2010 3 months after it had been put up on itunes as another deal was offered to her, they insisted that all trace be removed of the album, they didn't want any reference to it anywhere, it was written in a new contract and they were following up on it weekly:source;

</ref>http://read.mtvhive.com/2012/01/30/lana-del-rey-first-album-5-points-records-interview/</ref> </ref>http://www.billboard.com/features/lana-del-rey-the-billboard-cover-story-1005869152.story#/features/lana-del-rey-the-billboard-cover-story-1005869152.story</ref>

78.105.60.118 (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Aaron • ^{You Da One} 23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, please use the term 'series' and not 'season' when writing on British articles. Mythical Curse (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC).Reply[reply]

In March 2012, Matthew Protheroe (as stage name, Vince Kidd), auditioned for the first season of The Voice UK. Singing "Like a Virgin" by Madonna, Kidd was desired by all four of the show's judges - Danny O'Donoghue, Jessie J, Tom Jones and will.i.am; selecting Jessie J as his mentor to advance to the second round with.^[1]

I bolded the part you used the term 'season' in. It's from List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 4). Mythical Curse (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Chris Brown discography. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Oz ^talk 23:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Love Me (Stooshe song), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Love Me (StooShe song). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I see you have renamed StooShe to Stooshe by copying and pasting the content into a new article and redirecting the old one. However, you must not do that, as in doing so you have lost all of the old article history, and that is required to me kept in accordance with Wikipedia's copyright requirements. What you needed to do was simply move the existing article to the new spelling - see Wikipedia:Moving a page. Seeing as you have gone on to make further edits to the page, it will now require an admin with knowledge of merging page histories to fix the problem, so please stop editing the article until that has been done. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The same applies to Love Me (Stooshe song), but as there have not been significant edits to that since your copy/paste move, I have been able to do that one correctly - I've deleted your new article and moved the old one to the new title. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Really sorry, but you'll need other sources if you want to keep the Sam Buttery material you added. Your sole source actually pre-dates many of the things you mentioned. In short, you can't use that single source to support all the statements you added. Nothing personal. You are a good editor. I'm merely trying to help this page to adhere to WP:BLP guidelines. Would you like me to help you search for other sources? Regards,George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of UK top 10 singles in 2012, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rain the 1 17:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. You have new messages at Raintheone's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm RadioFan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Template:Will.i.am without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please do not remove content without an edit summary. If you feel content does not belong, at least provide some explanation when removing it. RadioFan (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Azealia Banks does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Mediran ^{talk|contribs} 09:04, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm Danielj27052705. AlligatorSky, thanks for creating Cough Cough!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It states that the song was released in 2012 yet in the chronology section it states 2009.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 17:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Stooshe discography does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - JuneGloom Talk 21:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your article, List of UK top 10 singles in 2013. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 17:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did here to ASAP Rocky discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, and please do not add unsourced material without citing a reliable source verifying your addition. Your edit does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tinie Tempah discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Years & Years page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Madonna albums discography. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — ((U|Technical 13)) (e • t • c) 03:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, the article Imagination (Gorgon City song) is currently up for deletion. I checked Gorgon City's bio page and in their discography section noticed that the song achieved minor success on the UK charts, which seems like a viable reason to keep the article. However I can't seem to find record of the song on Zobbel or the UK Dance Chart archives, considering you added those chart placings could you possibly link me to where you found the info? I'd appreciate it, thanks. Azealia911 _talk 19:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky! I'd like to invite you to join the Berkshire WikiProject. It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Berkshire-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of members. BaldBoris 14:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Magnets (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONGS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Azealia911 _talk 10:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ship to Wreck single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did you actually just come out of semi-retirement to update a chart position on two articles? I was doing it already and you honestly must have raced to those discography pages to do that before me, which I really do not understand. Ss112 15:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm assuming that was sarcasm, because nobody could or would be "assigned" to doing it. It doesn't really matter to me if somebody helps out as I usually endeavour to do it alone, I was just confused as to how two pages had been updated when no others had been, and to then see it was done by somebody who hadn't edited in months. Nothing against you, I was just wondering why this and now. Ss112 16:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PumpedUpKicksKnocks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Why Should I Love You & Post Break-Up Sex Vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wouldn't really point this out to editors, it's not worth it. Ss112 15:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, you're again jumping ahead of editors who have already started doing something, it's a bit rude. Ss112 15:46, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You said you weren't "questioning" me, then you did exactly that, which made no sense. Then mere minutes later you do this. Nice double standard right there. You were essentially questioning me why different editors do different things to me—I am not responsible for what any other editor, including Lk95, does. Ask them why they care about reverting over BPI's certifications—probably because they want to be the first to update them. Personally, I find different charts have different approaches. That's why I sent Lk95 a talk page message about German websites that will probably never update with the information Lk95 was claiming is/will be at them, because different sites now archive the information. At least officialcharts.com updates within a short amount of time. I never said to other editors to not update UK peaks because the information might not be there at the exact time they changed it. Besides, the best approach here or anywhere is, really, don't question why people do things if you're blatantly "guilty" of doing the exact same thing. Ss112 16:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ss112: I wasn't telling you off for making your edits to the UK chart positions, but rather asking about the correct procedure. I am not trying to start an argument, merely trying to understand how best to handle editing on Wikipedia; particularly as I'm seeing different users doing different things (e.g., you have pulled me up on making unsourced edits, yet make unsourced edits of your own). AlligatorSky 19:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't "pull you up" on making unsourced edits to anything until now, to point out the hypocrisy of asking questions that come off as criticism while doing the same thing (the previous section on this page that I made was about you "interrupting" another editor, e.g. me, already doing something, not about making unsourced edits). Your talk page message to me did not seem like merely innocently asking, it came off as criticism because it stemmed from nothing to do with me. Some situations aren't comparable—the German and UK situations are not the same, and nor are charts and certifications the same. Different editors have different approaches and care about different things. Lk95 wouldn't be the first to revert another editor extensively for updating BPI certifications ahead of time. I've seen that happen quite a bit. I might have even done it in the past—however it's not something I care that much about. As I said, it's best to ask the editor who reverted you directly why they did. I can't tell you the reason why another editor did what they did; I can only speculate. Ss112 18:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Mona has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 15:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conor Maynard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Way Back Home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Circa Waves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinyl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on BLOXX, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, AlligatorSky. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for adding references and updating singles for British artists. However, just a few things following my edit summary tags that I want to say:

• We do not need divides (|-) right at the end of wikitables ( |} ). They only start a new row.
• Generally, we should not use date parameters if we're citing iTunes, Spotify or Tidal. This parameter means publication date, and those websites only provide something's release date. Most albums are uploaded well in advance of that date to iTunes, for instance, and occasionally songs are too. So it's mostly unverifiable or at best misleading.
• Please use work or website for publications like NME, DIY, The Line of Best Fit and so on. These parameters (work/website) are mostly interchangeable. iTunes is a website and is published by Apple, not a publisher itself. As we're not citing Apple directly, we should putting website=iTunes or iTunes Store, or Apple Music. Publisher is hardly ever used, but can be used for something like AllMusic, as it is not a publication but a database.
• The country isn't really relevant to put next to iTunes/Apple Music (what matters more is what site it's on), and has mostly been phased out by the majority of users who add these sorts of references.
• Also, please try to cut down on links to the same articles in references that will come right after one another in the reflist. Hardly anybody will click on these anyway, and it's WP:REPEATLINK (even though that does say one can repeat refs in citations, it is unnecessary if they're all next to each other).

I am sorry if I came across as rude in my tags, but it has been tiring to alter this at many different articles, and seeing you go back to articles like Sam Fender to partially restore what I already cleaned up is somewhat irritating. Hopefully this clears that up for future instances. Thank you. Ss112 23:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ss112: Many thanks for this feedback, I will be sure to take it onboard! Apologies for having to make you go back and clean articles such as Sam Fender too, it was not my intention to make things harder for you. AlligatorSky 09:50, 8 March 2019

Thanks for creating Sea Girls.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Sea Girls.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Doomsdayer520)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 10 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, AlligatorSky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Nothing Great About Britain, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|TheLongTone)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for contributing to discographies and British music articles, however it is not a good practice to be adding what looks like your own opinion of what genres a song is when you make the article, as you did at Be Someone. If you can't source the genres, leave the parameter blank. Genres are by far the most controversial area of music articles, and so there will always be disagreements over them/changes to them, especially if they are not backed up by a good source, so they stick out when they are unsourced (and this also goes against WP:V). Thanks. Ss112 10:57, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It’s called “How Do You Sleep”

will be released July 19th, and was co-written by Sam Smith, Savan Kotecha, Ilya Salmanzadeh and Max Martin. There’s a insta page “howdoyousleep” Both Sam And ILYA Are following it. HengeBoy (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. Last week, you updated several peaks on Ladbroke Grove and changed the accessdate for the already updated UK chart. I updated that chart, and I obviously live in a different, further-ahead time zone than you, so please don't do this in future. It was not incorrect. Thanks. Ss112 15:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ss112: I wasn't to know that you live in a different, further-ahead time zone, so apologies; thought it was merely a typo. Will know for next time! AlligatorSky 21:26, 28 June 2019

Thanks for uploading File:Azealia Banks - 1991.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emeli Sandé discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With this edit on Fredo (British rapper), you replaced a link to Fredo's social media to Apple Music—whereas both are WP:PRIMARY sources and just as acceptable as each other. There was no need to replace it with a link to an online store, and besides, you'll find some users still think adding references to Apple Music, Spotify, Tidal and the like constitute promotion of a song. I don't, but in some senses your reference was not any better. Ss112 18:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:X-Factor (vol. 4) 1 cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:X-Factor (vol. 4) 1 cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|cc-by-sa-4.0)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have helped out on the draft for the Iron Man 2020 event that was started by @F. E. Puricelli:. If you want to help out, you can look for something that would enable us to get this draft out of it's draft stage. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:No Hope single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Batman: Urban Legends, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude ^talk 09:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Excalibur (vol. 4) 1 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Regarding edits like this, I might have let you know before, but please avoid removing the temporary citations below chart peaks when a song is actively ascending a chart and gaining week upon week, as "Prada" is doing right now. The citations will just be re-added next week (it's slightly more of a pain to copy a new one instead of updating the old one, which could be alleviated by not removing them), and there's no need to remove them like we need to make the table look more "presentable" or similar arguments I've read other editors use. Thanks. Ss112 07:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for letting me know Ss112, as I hadn't thought about it this way before - will keep in mind for future edits. AlligatorSky (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Distant Past single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brit Awards 2024, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rema.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]