Dear sir, when does make my wikipedia contribution page public to view? Amarjeetkr97 (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bro I'm from Daudnagar Raushank488 (talk) 12:34, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Government Polytechnic, Patna-7.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Government Polytechnic, Patna-7.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self)) (to release all rights), ((self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL)) (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bihar School Examination Board (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to English

Daudnagar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bokaro

Shamshernagar, India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Market

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Government Polytechnic Patna-7, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 19:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Government Polytechnic Patna-7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 19:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir, The page Government Polytechnic Patna-7 is all about government institute information. This is created in point of opinion of information for students. Previously this was unknown Government College. So this is created for information to the wikipedia family that is contributed. ARJ 20:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, you're welcome to contest the speedy deletion nomination in the article's talk page. I've done some research on the article topic and under Wikipedia notability guidelines, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Under current circumstances of the article, it fails to meet that requirement, and is also written without a neutral point of view. If my assumptions are incorrect, feel free to explain the reason your article is notable and doesn't require speedy deletion by clicking the following link and creating the page here: Talk:Government Polytechnic Patna-7. Thanks, Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 20:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may also go to the article itself and click the blue button "Contest this speedy deletion" in the red template box. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 20:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As an User already created same Page as first contribution on wikipedia. And again created to explain the redirect of same Institute name Government Polytechnic Patna-7 by help of coping which is already written. ARJ 20:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi again, if you're going to contest the nomination the right place to do so is by going to the article's page and clicking "Contest this speedy deletion". Thanks, Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 20:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Government Polytechnic, Patna-7.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I did some cleanup on the Shamshernagar, India article along with other editors. There were a few items that I could not make sense of without local knowledge. Could you help out, either by answering my questions or making your own edits to the article?

• Are the two high schools, intermediate level or senior level (graduates can apply for university)?
• I didn't understand this phrase, The nearest railway station is the Anugraha Narayan Road railway station on the Howrah-Delhi main line, Grand Chord near Pawarganj in Aurangabad - the part starting with Grand Chord is unclear. Is it a branch line?
• I left the database reference to the part about the village being electrified in the article, but it would be much better if the reference was a news article or some other reliable source, as the database is considered a primary source and not considered a good one by Wikipedia standards.
• There was an earlier reference to Nahar and Escape for the Sone River and Barrage, but it wasn't clear what was meant.

Could you help out here? Thanks, Curiocurio (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answers Amarjeetkr97! I've made a few changes to the article. Curiocurio (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on National Means Cum-Merit Scholarship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://mhrd.gov.in/nmms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government Engineering College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amarjeetkr97,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Priya Kumar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

GMG^talk 14:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, National Means Cum-Merit Scholarship, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Public health engineering, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public health engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public health engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mithapur, Patna, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 14:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mithapur, Patna. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Public Health Engineering Department".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Means Cum-Merit Scholarship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 14:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Government Engineering College, Arwal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 20:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Government Engineering College, Arwal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 20:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AnUnnamedUser. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. AnUnnamedUser ^{(open talk page)} 21:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maithili Thakur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Chanwar Chamar, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I decided to revert all the edits you made to the Ravidas article. Here are my reasons for doing so:

1) False edit summary - many times you removed information yet you used the words "Information added" in your edit summary.

2) You deleted a historical depiction of Ravidas and replaced it with a modern poster image that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons under false copyright tags.

3) You added Indic terminology into the article without providing a translation or explanation of the terms. Remember this is the English Wikipedia and many readers can come from a background who are unfamiliar with these terms. We need to keep them in-mind when we edit articles.

4) You claimed Mirabai as being a disciple of Ravidas without citing a source to support this claim.

I have gone through your edits to re-add any that may be useful/constructive to the article. The only thing I have re-instated is the wikilink to Rana Sanga's article.

I appreciate your willingness to improve Wikipedia but please reconsider if the edit you are going to publish will improve the article from an encyclopedic standpoint. Thank you, ThethPunjabi (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have attempted to re-add the copyrighted image back into the infobox whilst deleting the historical depiction again. I have reverted you again. Please address the issues I have raised and stop circumventing my attempt at dialogue to push for your changes to the article. ThethPunjabi (talk) 07:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please have a look at WP:V and WP:RS if you haven't already. In your edits to the article Chamar, you made several unsourced changes, some of which contradict the cited sources (e.g. you changed "bitter" to "better") or do not make sense (e.g. you changed the name of a person from "Raghuvanshi" to "Surjyabanshi"). Also, several of these changes are poorly-sourced. For example, you cited the article Chamar (mountain) to assert that the Chamar caste is found in Nepal - first of all that article is about a mountain, and secondly, you can't cite Wikipedia per WP:CIRCULAR. Also chamar.in, news4social.com etc. are not reliable sources, Ain-i-Akbari is a primary source, the other book that you added is a dead link without page number etc. Feel free to reinstate your edits with proper sources. utcursch | talk 23:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding your edits to Ginni Mahi, please see Wikipedia:Copyright violations - you can't just download images from other websites and post them here as your own work. utcursch | talk 23:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chamar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. cagliost (talk) 12:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't just reinstate your edits without addressing any of the concerns outlined above. Continuing to add unsourced and poorly-unsourced content will result in a block. utcursch | talk 23:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Capitals00 (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chamar, you may be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 22:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please address the concerns mentioned in the Sources section above, before you reinstate your edits. In the past, you have received at least 5 messages that talk about reliable sources and verifiability. If you continue to add unsourced / poorly-sourced content, you will be blocked. utcursch | talk 22:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation source of content information is applied from website links. This is authentic to verify.

History section contains abusive and arrogant information. ARJ 14:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Citation source of content information is applied from website links. This is authentic to verify.

History section contains abusive and arrogant information ARJ 14:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chamar. utcursch | talk 06:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if your comprehension is poor or if you have general competency issues, but you carefully need to go through #Sources section above. You cannot just change "bitter" to "better", change name of a person from "Raghuvanshi" to "Surjyabanshi", cite the article about a mountain to support information about a caste and so on. If you haven't gone through WP:TUTORIAL already, please do so before making any further edits. utcursch | talk 06:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation source of content information is applied from website links. This is authentic to verify.

History section contains abusive and arrogant information ARJ 14:49, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, You may correct it by editing but not remove whole history page which contain arrogant and hateful contents defaming the diginity of the large community. ARJ 14:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Chanwar Chamar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation source of content information is applied from Government website. This is authentic to verify. ARJ 14:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Surjyabanshi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation source of content information is applied from Government website. This is authentic to verify. ARJ 14:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  utcursch | talk 04:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This block is for continuing to add unsourced / poorly-unsourced content as mentioned at #Sources. Also, regarding this edit, please see Wikipedia:No legal threats.

Please use this week to go through WP:TUTORIAL, if you haven't already. utcursch | talk 04:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The history sources are false and baseless. It is oral tell of Atrocities whereas authencity is not true. This contents defaming the diginity of the large community. Review the cotents which discriminated against the community. Adhere positive contents regarding the community classified arrogant which should be rectification. ARJ 14:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

The history sources are false and baseless. It is oral tell of Atrocities whereas authencity is not true. This contents defaming the diginity of the large community. Review the cotents which discriminated against the community. ARJ 14:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bihar Engineering University, Patna. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – BEU Patna. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at BEU Patna. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 10:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:ANI#Obsession to create an article on an institution. Thank you.  – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 14:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article BEU Patna should to redirect Bihar Engineering University Patna and State University of Bihar ARJ 16:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Dear colleague BEU Patna article should change its name of full stand Bihar Engineering University Patna. ARJ 16:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chamar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avantivarman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chamar. utcursch | talk 06:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding these comments: Please see WP:NOTCENSORED: talking about the atrocities that a social group has suffered in the past is not same as defaming them. As mentioned before, have a look at WP:V and WP:RS: if you feel a source is not reliable, feel free to discuss it at WP:RSN. Also, please have a look at Wikipedia:Competence is required. utcursch | talk 07:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ain-i-Akbari is a primary source - it should not be cited to support historical facts: only its interpretations by qualfied historians should be. Websites like news4social are not reliable sources. Also, you have been adding several unsourced bits, which is not acceptable. utcursch | talk 00:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article BEU Patna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, plus the reason for the inappropriate name (=an abbreviation) appears to be that other versions of the article (Bihar Engineering University and Bihar Engineering University, Patna have been deleted and salted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | tålk 13:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
Your interest in getting an article on Bihar Engineering University (however you spell or abbreviate it) into Wikipedia and into our lists[1] seems very great. Is anybody paying you for these efforts? Bishonen | tålk 21:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chanwar Chamar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amarjeetkr97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Surjyabanshi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I like your edits on the Chamar page. Will you also help me in editing this page? Maheyyash (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]