Welcome!

Hello, Andrija.b, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 13:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi nice clarinet article see the page Clarinetist for a list of missing articles you can contribue to. remember to categorize see your Yugoslav article. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 20:24, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You added a reference to a performance of this concerto and tagged it as remarkable. Can you substantiate the assertion? brian stormer (talk) 19:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to express your opinion here. --Svetislav Jovanović 01:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sad ne mogu, ali mozes poceti clanak, pa cu ga ja dopuniti ako bude trebalo :) --KOCOBO 03:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sto se tice univerziteta, a i drugih stvari, mozda bi mogao da se prikljucis projektu WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias koga sam upravo pokrenuo. Nikola 21:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to List of FY musicians. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This also applies to the other speedy deletion templates you improperly removed from related articles. They have been restored. Please do not remove them again. Read the speedy deletion template and use the proper method of contesting deletion. Erechtheus 19:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Serbia, you should be aware that the project as well as Portal:Serbia is being considered for deletion. If you have the time, please comment on what you feel should be done with the project and the portal. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kada bi mi i samom svo to zamesateljstvo bilo jasno pomogao bih vrlo rado :/ Nikola 09:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potpisite peticiju protiv nezavisnosti Kosova i prosledite sajt drugima da ovi proslede trecima itd. Pozdrav!

Hi Friends,

I have just read and signed the petition: "No Independence For Kosovo"

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/905791187

Please feel free to write your representatives in addition to signing the petition. We show solidarity for Serbia and Also We Let Our Representative Know that We Support Serbia Territorial Integrity, with Letters and with Petition.

Note: I cannot change the petition text. So I will write the errata here: Josip Broz Tito was president of Yugoslavia, not of Serbia. Please forgive me the error. Also feel free to write me at savekosovo_metohijanow@msn.com, about any irregular signatures you see on the site. I am able to have those removed.

Thanks!

ThePetitionSite.com provides tools and empowers individuals to make a difference and effect positive change through online activism. Get connected with the causes you care about, take action to make the world a better place, and start your own petition at http://www.ThePetitionSite.com!

ThePetitionSite.com is powered by Care2.com, the largest online network for people who Care2 make a difference. With over 5 million members, we make it easy for you to live a healthy, sustainable lifestyle and protect the environment, human rights, education, women's rights, animal welfare, and much more... all in one place! Join our community at http://www.Care2.com Andrija 22:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala za informacija Andrija. // Laughing Man 22:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop spamming with that poll message. Some internet poll is not going to make a difference, it's only going to annoy people and make them vote supporting independence for Kosovo. Yes, independence for Kosovo, self-determination! PAVARËSI PËR KOSOVËN!!! Dirak 00:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments on an article or user discussion page in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you are addressing your comments. This is because comments should be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. —Psychonaut 00:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but what's the point of that Petition? It only that around 15,000 signatures and without JMBG, they're all worthless. Particularly because many of them are practical jokes. Do you really expect me to believe that today lives a "Milos Obilic" in Kosovo Polje in Serbia and Montenegro (which by the way no longer exists)? Plus, why is S&M listed as a country? There is more than 120,000 Serbs in Kosoovo.

When they're already speaking in precise figures, they should say 17% and not "15%". And connections with Al-Qaeda is just very bad POV. Also, the International Law to which the petition draws actually allows the independence of Kosovo in a way (self-determination). Also, the Constitution of Serbia has received only several thousand votes, out of a population of several million, so it's worthless in Kosovo... you already commented on Tito being President of Serbia (sic!).

Aside from that, it's written in child English and even is in a way insulting. --PaxEquilibrium 00:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Besides that... Serbianna is a Serbian nationalist website... utterly POV. --PaxEquilibrium 01:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add random poll spam to my user page. Neilc 05:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nor to mine. I do not know why did you think a good idea to spam me with political petition request, but I feel strongly against any message directed at me that has any connection to real life politics. I would appriciate it if you would refrain from ever spamming me again. Shinhan 06:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrija, please read WP:CANVASS, WP:SPAM and WP:SOAPBOX. Your last 100 contributions are the petition spam, as well as canvassing for University of Pristina . Please have in mind any future similar instance of canvassing may lead to an extended block. Thanks. Duja► 08:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments on an article or user discussion page in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you are addressing your comments. This is because comments should be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. —Psychonaut 13:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the Wiki convention is the "most frequently and widely used names" and to the general public he's known as Boki Milosevic, not Bozidar Milosevic. Zvonko 14:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The usual. I don't see how it could be improved. Nikola 07:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Tiddly Tom 21:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Arbo Valdma (born 1942 in Pärnu, Estonia) is one of the leading Serbian-Estonian pianists and piano professor. It is no overstatement to name him the ultimative Serbian-Estonian pianist :->. --131.152.61.96 15:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. However, it would be more usefully to expand this article and to write articles about his former students. If you can, please do so.--Andrija 17:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Andrija, my irony seems to be lost on you. So: How many Serbian-Estonian pianists are there? Let me guess: One, him. The sentence "one of the leading Serbian-Estonian pianists" therefore doesn't make any sense. I have an interest in meaningful sentences and none in your pianists. --131.152.61.96 12:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the article and have decided that it did not meet the good article criteria. Please see the talk page to see what improvements need to be done for the article to reach GA status. I also encourage you to look at other GA music articles to see what is expected. T Rex | talk 12:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Allen Cohen (composer), we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.welltonenewmusic.org/cec_april20.html. As a copyright violation, Allen Cohen (composer) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Allen Cohen (composer) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Allen Cohen (composer) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Allen Cohen (composer) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Allen Cohen (composer).

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. BuddingJournalist 20:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Well, in that case, the author must specifically release the text under GFDL or some compatible license (see Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission). If it's published elsewhere online, then the website must indicate that it is a GFDL license (or equivalent). Or, of course, rewriting it might be easier (and make the text more encyclopedic in the process). Hope this helps. Cheers, BuddingJournalist 15:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As a Serb Wikipedian are you aware that there is absolutely no mention of Ustasha crimes in the List of war crimes?

Something needs to be done. Unfortunately I am not in a position to do so, but I submit it for your consideration. Spread the word. 216.194.20.252 (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was born in Indiana but I was exchange student in Croatia, I also visited Kosovo, is it best that you guys separate after official referendum, that's what you are thinking?Good, most practical! Do you expect war? What part of serbia are you from? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kosovo_map-en.svg This river, is it good border, what's length of it, sirina?

I see you're disrupting articles related to the list of municipalities of Kosovo. Please, don't disrupt the neutral point of view that guides Wikipedia. Otherwise, I will put a notice on the administrative board. --_Arbër ^{t •  ?} 10:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This makes no sense. NPOV requires that all significant point of view be present, not the most significant one, or anything similar. Surely, POV that Kosovo is a country is not the only one that should be presented. Nikola (talk) 00:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits.

Discuss changes to the intro FIRST within the TALK PAGE. If you want it to include "и Метохија; Kosovo i Metohija" than try to gain consensus FIRST in the Talk Page. Do not revert prior to discussion.

To reiterate: you need to goto the Talk Page and propose your changes BEFORE you change the intro. That intro took many months of discussion to complete. You must goto the talk page and propose your change before enacting it. Please don't start an edit war. I don't want to be banned over your actions.

I am not saying that your edit is necessarily wrong or bad, I'm just saying you need to discuss it first. Good luck man. Beam 18:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sanja Stijačić (2004).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sanja Stijacic (2004).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Association of Music and Ballet Pedagogues of Serbia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 20:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Milenko Stefanovic (2005).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Milenko Stefanovic (2005).JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the ((GFDL-self)) tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Milenko Stefanovic (2005).JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Milenko Stefanovic (2005).JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the ((GFDL-self)) tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nov sam ovde i jos nisam uspeo da se snadjem. Puno hvala na editu moje stranice. Receno mi je da vam se obratim za pomoc. Na srpskoj wikipediji postoji moja stranica ali neki ljudi dovode u pitanje relevantnost podataka, koliko sam uspeo da shvatim. Pokusao sam da im objasnim kako to funkcionise ali iygleda da se ne razumemo dovoljno i sada mi na sred stranice stoji tekst kako clanak ili poglavlje ne citira izvore itd. Osecam se potpuno sludjeno. Situacija je tipa "Nas poznati teniser osvojio je taj i taj turnir, te i te godine, u tom i tom gradu". I sada mi se za informaciju sa podacima tog tipa trazi izvor. Novinski clanci, veb sajt i sta god vec. Puno hvala na pomoci do sada i nadam se da cete mi mozda uspesno objasniti kako da nadjem izvor za informacije koje se jedino mogu dokazati putem diploma (koje imam) ili pukom srecom ako ti podaci postoje negde na nekom sajtu u sta sumnjam jer su nagrade osvajane u intervalu 1995.-2000.

Hvala jos jednom i srdacan pozdrav- Milos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.72.47 (talk) 17:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Za početak, kolega, drago mi je što smo se, uslovno rečeno, upoznali. Nema potrebe da se osećaš sluđeno. Ali, razumem te. I meni se dešavalo u početku da napišem nešto iz najboljih namera, a onda pročitam gomilu kritika na račun onog što sam napisao, zato što se prilikom pisanja nisam pridržavao pravila (koja mi u to vreme nisu ni bila poznata). A pošto je jedno od pravila da se na engleskoj Vikipediji razgovara isključivo na engleskom (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andrija.b#Please_use_English_2), predlažem da razgovor na srpskom nastavimo na srpskoj Vikipediji (http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80_%D1%81%D0%B0_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC:Andrija.b#Hvala.--Andrija (talk) 21:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Molim te, obrati pažnju na par članaka, imam problema sa nekim idiotom, vidi u history!

To su:

Ulpiana, Pančić's Peak‎, Šarplaninac‎, Đeravica‎, Šar Mountains‎, i još Adem Jashari!

Ne znam kome još da se obratim, ali vidi, zamolio bih za watch, kada nas je više, neće moći baš tako lako! Hvala puno, unapred!!

Tadija (talk) 15:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dušan Trbojević, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article fails to establish the notability of the subject, and I was unable to find any reliable sources to establish his notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 18:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ante Grgin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:27, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mihailo Vukdragovic.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bruno Brun-en.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 10:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aleksandar Obradovic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mihailo Vukdragovic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo Andrija. Ne vredi, ta stranica je navodno samo predlog i nije usvojena, ne znam šta je potrebno za to. Vanjagenije i ja obržavamo situaciju koliko se može pod NPOV, ali pomoć je uvek potrebna! POZZdrav!!

Tadija (talk) 10:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, get involved!

Talk:Kamenica_(Kosovo)#Requested_move

Best regards, Pagliaccioknows (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrija, pomozite da se reše nedoumice oko NPOV u ovom članku. Lepa reč za NAŠU stvar bi značila...

{:)

Talk:Adem_Jashari

Pozdrav, Tadija (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Faculty of Arts.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrija. b, i need your opinion. Please, we have problem with one article, and your voice will be useful.

Adem Jashari, and Talk:Adem Jashari.

Thank you, and i wait for your words.

Tadija (talk) 10:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Anton Eberst.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nikola Srdić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CREATIVE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falcon8765 (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add the clarinet template to every person's article just because they play clarinet. That's just wrong.Cosprings (talk) 19:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Catalog back page.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In note, it appears that only Serbia doesn't recognise it. There are majority of UN nations (130) that agree with Serbia. It this note, there are no information about that. Following NPOV, that must be changed. I invite you to join discussion, and vote.

Template talk:Kosovo-note

Tadija (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrija, podeli sa svetom svoje mišljenje na ovu temu. Svaki glas je jako značajan! Pozdrav! 13:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catalog back page.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Marko Nesic.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Music Barnstar
		Per creating articles related to Serbian classical music! Awarded by Tadija

Tadija (talk) 13:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please, join Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance, and expend Serbia related Articles, and help creation of new and better Wikipedia, with WP:CPGI high on the list.

Also, you can invite new members, that will help WP even more.

All best, Tadija (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your ideas? Click me! :) Tadija (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See new Main page! Impressions on talk page! --Tadija (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrija.b! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 975 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the ((unreferencedBLP)) tag. Here is the article:

1. Sean Osborn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can use it if you want, but if not, just leave it here! :)

This user participates in WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia.

All best, --Tadija (talk) 11:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Milenko Stefanovic (with clarinet).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Žarko Milojković has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable WP:PROF, effectively unreferenced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 11:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should explain your vote in few sentences, as per propositions of the vote. Only votes will be no useful. --Tadija^speaks 14:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously contributed to the Pančić's Peak article. Please see my comment at Talk:Pančić's Peak#Central Serbia or Kosovo. --Bejnar (talk) 20:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:I.C.A. logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Stefanovic performing Copland.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add ((OTRS pending)) to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Milenko Stefanović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ernest Ačkun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yugoslavian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you participated in discusion before, please see here the last proposition. Thanks! --WhiteWriter ^speaks 22:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've proposed this category for merging with the Category:Members of national academies, because that's what the category's current content suggests. Regards, --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milenko Stefanović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ante Grgin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add ((di-replaceable fair use disputed)), without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sanja Stijačić (2004).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrija.b, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Aaron Copland's concert in Belgrade.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Best European Orchestras.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Hi, Andrija.b, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

--Anulmanul (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Radmila Bakocevic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nikola Srdic.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 07:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Donne in musica competition.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jury of Jeunesses Musicales International Competition.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Save0020.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Best European Orchestras.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nebojša Todorović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently fails WP:NACAEMIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 15:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrija.b. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrija.b. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrija.b. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to hear your opinion on this matter - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Serbians

Thank you.

Mm.srb (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

music from Serbia

Thank you for quality articles around music from Serbia with a focus on clarinet, such as Milenko Stefanović, Belgrade Philharmonic Orchestra, Marija Gluvakov and Biserka Cvejić, including images such as Tomislav Trific, - Andrija, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2537 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerry Kirkbride is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Kirkbride until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aza24 (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ljuba Brkić has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp/dated)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Myles K. Mart (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peko Nikčević has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP. Sculptor and Art teacher— notability tag since June 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Myles K. Mart (talk) 18:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jasmina Novokmet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP. Notabilty tag on since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Myles K. Mart (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anđelko Karaferić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability tag since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Myles K. Mart (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Jasmina Novokmet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ljuba Brkic .jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Ljuba Brkić. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drago Đurić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drago Đurić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ernest Ačkun.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text ((Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>)) below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Izudin Čavrković is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izudin Čavrković until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Nebojša Todorović (2004).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused photo of non-notable academic whose article was deleted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]