Archives

/Archive 1 (2006-02-08 → 2007-02-23) /Archive 2 (2007-02-28 → 2007-04-12) /Archive 3 (2007-04-15 → 2007-07-24) /Archive 4 (2007-07-27 → 2007-09-27) /Archive 5 (2007-10-03 → 2007-12-23) /Archive 6 (2007-12-31 → 2008-02-29) /Archive 7 (2008-03-02 → 2008-04-03) /Archive 8 (2008-04-09 → 2008-05-26) /Archive 9 (2008-05-30 → 2008-07-31) /Archive 10 (2008-08-06 → 2008-10-20) /Archive 11 (2008-11-18 → 2009-03-20) /Archive 12 (2009-04-04 → 2009-08-17) /Archive 13 (2009-08-26 → 2009-12-10) /Archive 14 (2009-12-18 → 2010-10-13) /Archive 15 (2010-10-21 → 2011-04-22) /Archive 16 (2011-05-02 → 2011-09-30) /Archive 17 (2011-10-03 → 2013-11-07)

Template:Nwft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you have edited on the Winners template page, This is only for national teams, Is their another template or any other way doing it for club teams?

Thanks --Skyblueshaun (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. But club teams don't usually have flags, and team logos are often non-free images, so they couldn't be shown in this context anyway. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Olympics for a Signpost article in celebration of the 2014 Winter Olympics. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 16:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Andrwsc: Your affirmation that a decision of the UN is irrelevant and speculative left me astonished. All the NOC's represented in edition of the Olympic Games bear an official representation of their country. The matter of the couple of sentences that I have added is "specification" and not an "speculation". On the other hand, the table, which was NOT built by myself, as well as the upper one related to Germany show an historical perspective for comparison and are not merely an specualation because they are based in real (already consumed) facts. I would insist in the practical clyrifying function of the added by me sentences and the convinience to keep them. Believe, that is the first time some body in this life tell to me that a decision of the UN nations is irrelevant. Are you should of having enough knowledge's background for editing articles of wikipedia? I understand that for many people this is just a non serious hobby, or for others many basic things could seem obvious, but it is good to leave the content of the articles enough explained for the lecture of general audiences. GabEuro (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, I haven't done much research on this, but as I'm attempting to slowly bring all the Country at the Olympics articles to a single standard, I'm having a bit of a hard time with Yemen. Does the IOC not combine any pre-1992 Yemeni appearances by North or South Yemen with post-1992 appearances? Theoretically, we'd then need three separate articles, Yemen (which we have), South Yemen (which we have as the 1988 Summer article), and North Yemen, which now redirects to Yemen. So I'm just trying to understand, if this is similar to IOC's view of Germany, of example. Jmj713 (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that it is indeed similar to the German situation. Prior to unification they competed as separate teams, and also had separate codes (YAR and YMD before, YEM after), which is similar to how the IOC dealt with Germany (FRG and GDR before, GER after). But I also think that the Yemen at the Olympics article could certainly include mention of the 1984 YAR and 1988 YAR&YMD teams; I don't there is a need for additional high-level "____ at the Olympics" articles for South Yemen and North Yemen individually. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I was thinking, thanks. Also, if you're interested, I've compiled a list on the status of all the Country at the Olympics articles, as I'm slowly working toward improving all of them. Would always appreciate any help. On a related note, I'm seeing some disruptive but likely good-faith edits by Aight 2009, removing historical context from tables, such as with Croatia at the Olympics or Czech Republic at the Olympics. I don't know if you have these on your Watchlist. Jmj713 (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if you look at for example infobox of poland you will see 1924 as the first year of participation because it was the first time joining to the olympics. poland didn't missed anything because didn't exist or declined to participate in 1920 so olympics before 1924 aren't included. all in all i think that bohemia in 1896 didn't missed anything and its part in olympics started in 1900. it is not misleading to not include 1896 olympics.

In Poland's case, it probably doesn't help to list multiple Games before their first appearance. But in Bohemia's case, there is a single Games that they missed prior to their first appearance, and that is why listed it is helpful. It highlights that they started competing almost from the beginning, except for only the inaugural Games. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since the appearances by (Southern) Rhodesia and Zimbabwe should be treated the same as Zaire and DR Congo, I merged Rhodesia at the Olympics and Zimbabwe at the Olympics, but I wasn't sure how to properly correct the infobox flags and such. Could you please correct that as you did with Zaire? Thanks. Jmj713 (talk) 03:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What needs to change? Which articles? — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 03:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you already took care of it and Zambia, thanks! 14:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

I disagree with retroactively applying the ZIM code to a time when Zimbabwe (as a state) did not yet exist. To me, it makes no sense to see the code ZIM being used for articles about Rhodesia's participation in the Games in the 1960s. The IOC treats Rhodesia and Zimbabwe separately. And unlike the Zaire case, the change from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe was not simply a name change. It was a change from one state to another. Aridd (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All 1928, 1960 and 1964 articles (e.g. top level Games articles, sport articles and event articles like Boxing at the 1928 Summer Olympics – Men's welterweight and Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics – Men's 100 metres), would still use "RHO". The only article affected are the Rhodesia at the 1928 Summer Olympics etc. articles, which now show the "Zimbabwe at the Olympics" infobox, but with a big Rhodesian flag captioned with "Flag of Southern Rhodesia". — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not retroactive and it's showing the code used at the given Games, it fully complies with WP:OLY practices, please take a look here. Jmj713 (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It still seems odd to me to have the "Zimbabwe" infobox on the Rhodesia pages, with the clearly anachronistic ZIM code. Surely it creates confusion rather than clarity. But well; we'll see if anyone else has a view on the topic. Aridd (talk) 08:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Countries change their IOC codes all the time, and this should be noted on the appropriate article with the "oldcode" function. Like HOL and NED, for example. Jmj713 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Template Barnstar
		Awarded to Andrwsc, for brilliantly creating the ideal solution to the very ancient and very annoying sporting flagicon link problem. Tlhslobus (talk) 05:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Ryder Cup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((substituted))</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrwsc,

About four year ago in April 2010 I started to work the articles on Sailing (in the wide since of the word) at the Summer Olympics. At that moment and during the process you had good pointers and advice for me to improve the articles. Sometimes we disagreed but made the outcome always better regardless who won:-) the debate. Now April 2014 I think I have got touched all of the pages (with the exception of the results of the 2000 Olympics) at least with one large edit. Now I'm about to start the next cycle starting with 1900 and finishing wit the overall title Sailing at the Olympics. My goals of this cycle are:

• to bring the pages minimal to the same "standard" as 1972 and it's sub pages,
• To create/upgrade the surrounding articles like those of the scoring systems of sailing throughout the years and when relevant the Olympic classes
• To got rid of most "Red" links in the pages
• To make the articles more illustrated where relevant of needed to "promote" the Olympic sailing
• To got the articles graded by the sailing project

Hopefully you will be there to support this second cycle as well.

If you agree that the quality and depth of these articles is improved in the first cycle you can take 50% of the credits;-).

Regards, NED33 _/) talk 17:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not very active on Wikipedia any more, so I would suggest asking at WT:WikiProject Olympics instead. I do not want any "credit". My only suggestions for now would be:

1. There is no reason to invent specific templates for these pages (e.g. ((Infobox Olympic Sailing)) and ((Improve Olympic Sailing Article))) instead of using the standard ones.
2. It is excessive to include a cumulative medal table on every "Sailing at the year Olympics" page. No other sport page does this.
3. I do not think you will get much consensus for including a "top ranked countries" section in the infobox. The complete medal table within the article is fully sufficient and does not need to be trimmed for the infobox.
4. You tend to use icons excessively, often in violaton of WP:Manual of Style/Icons. For example, there is no reason to use the and symbols instead of writing "men" and "women" in text. You also use the sail emblem images as icons freely in these articles, which I find far more distracting than the name of the event.

Hope this feedback is useful. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you still testing or using Template:Flag data 1896 Summer Olympics in some way? I don't want to list it at TfD if I'm missing something. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, May I ask you to revert your own edit here or maybe find another solution for this problem, at the moment ((fh|Malaya)) goes to  Malaya, which is a disambiguation page. thanks in advance. Mohsen1248 (talk) 21:45, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed by this edit — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, May I ask you to look at this case. User EtienneDolet removed perfectly referenced source, yet kept armenian source. I think it is direct breach of WP:NPOV as seen here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guba_mass_grave&diff=622226015&oldid=622213342 --Yacatisma (talk) 20:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for creating Polo at the 1924 Summer Olympics. Would you please consider adding inlined references? Also, I have created Jean Pastré, but the reference I found for the match listed other players--I am not sure if I misunderstood the source or if there were several matches with different players (could have been the case). Ideally, I think all the players who competed in the Olympics should have their own pages, this being such an incredible achievement...Zigzig20s (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AAlleged_War_on_Terror_militants_of_country&diff=632300341&oldid=632287955

(do not need Template:Country data placeholder. An empty parameter list to ((flagicon)) does what you want.)

For the sake of any future users of the template (and as a future reminder), I thought a placeholder image, not nothing, would be more helpful. I compiled "Country data placeholder" rather than this, however, as this situation seems possible elsewhere.

Yours, Sardanaphalus (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We've had discussions in the past against the use of placeholder images (e.g. Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 8#Template:Country data Unknown) so I think that the missing flag icon ought to appear only in the template documentation and never in a mainspace article. I think your use of <noinclude> in the Alleged War on Terror militants of country meta-template handles this perfectly. Thanks — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Understood. Thanks for the context. Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Request for Comment about "Chronological Summaries of the Olympics" and you're invited! Becky Sayles (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrwsc. I was wondering why this flag is allowed on the article Nashville, Tennessee but not on Nashville mayoral election, 2015 when the licensing says that it qualifies as fair use? Thanks, Tiller54 (talk) 23:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The fair-use policy is applicable here. Using the image on the Flag of Nashville, Tennessee article and the Nashville, Tennessee article is supported by appropriate non-free media rationale statements on the image description page (e.g. "Used for purposes of illustration in an educational article about the flag. The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of this article topic."). There is no fair-use rationale for any other article, nor would it be appropriate to add more FURs to the image description page. On the Nashville mayoral election, 2015 article, the flag image would be merely decorative—especially when displayed as a small icon in the infobox without any caption or article text describing it. That style of image usage also does not meet criteria #8 ("Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.") — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 21:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. Tiller54 (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Mughal Empire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Abecedare (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me! I am a beginner in writing articles for Wikipedia and I want to use yours file: Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg in the articles List of current dependent territory leaders, Liste des principaux dirigeants locaux, Liste des chefs de l'exécutif par État en 2015 and in the years to come after 2015 and Lista conducătorilor de stat în anul 2015 and in the years to come after 2015, in order to in order to illustrate with their own flag Torres Strait Islands What can I do? Bogdan Uleia (talk) 14:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you change the flag used for the island of Ireland on the ((FlagCGF|IRE)) template from the green harp to blue ?

I believe the flag they used for the 1930 Games was the 1542 blue harp Standard, then used on the Royal Standard of the United Kingdom, not the green harp flag. The citations on the Ireland at the British Empire Games article do not contradict this information; the photo gallery link shows the bust on the harp (third flag from right), page 14 of the publication says the harp was 'on a blue (or possibly green) background'. VEO^onefive 11:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Smd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 50.53.1.33 (talk) 20:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Smc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 50.53.1.33 (talk) 20:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrwsc. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox country Olympics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrwsc.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrwsc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geobox locator Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey Andrwsc. I noticed that you deleted ((Country data JP)) and ((Country data RU)) back in 2009. Would you be opposed to restoring them? ((Video game release)) is hard coding these two regions (As well as BR -> Brazil) because these redirects don't exist. For all other countries, we rely on getalias and country data, so UK->United Kingdom works fine because ((Country data UK)) exists. We are looking to remove hard coded regions where possible. -- ferret (talk) 13:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KMF (talk) 04:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrwsc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Appreciate your contributions, I have note about template:infobox national volleyball team this volleyball template need age category Option hope you ad it for 23,21.19 age for men & 23,20,18 age for women, and then It 'll be a complete template like other sports : football, basketball, handball ... however, thanks. Gobantini (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrwsc - I've just come across a problem on 2010 ICC World Cricket League Africa Region Division Two. Back in 2010, when the flag of Malawi changed (before it changed back again) you added a '1964' qualifier. However the underlying country data (((Country data Malawi))) doesn't support this, so the display is broken. Do you think it would be better to add the parameter to the country data, or just to remove it from the article? Are you aware of any other pages that may use this '1964' parameter (or perhaps a 2010 or 2012 variant)? If it's just the one page, I can simply remove it. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to edit the 1964 flag is the same as the current flag, so if an unavailable variant is used with the flag templates, it defaults to the current flag. Therefore, the "|1964" markup is unnecessary and has no effect, but the correct flag is used anyway. You can certainly remove the useless markup from that article, but nothing is broken. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 23:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RankedMedalTable has been nominated for merging with Template:Medals table. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MedalTable has been nominated for merging with Template:Medals table. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to respond to an edit request at Template talk:Country data Eswatini#Template-protected edit request on 1 November 2018 I went to consult the documentation and I see that Wikipedia:WikiProject Flag Template#Template documentation includes a blank pre-/pre section since you added it in 2007. Is there an omission? Cabayi (talk) 12:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrwsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andrwsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:32TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 14:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CompactTable has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data South America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. V27t (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IOC medals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

San Marino at the 2002 Winter Olympics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nepal at the 2010 Winter Olympics has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 08:20, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]