I've added the "((prod))" template to the article Donald Henry 'Bob' Burns, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Donald Henry 'Bob' Burns. If you remove the ((dated prod)) template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. I accept your case and so I will just propose to be deleted, this will depend of the consensus reached. --Francisco Valverde 17:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will remove that, Francisco, though it seemed a little unethical to me to do so myself. I've been working on the article, and will continue to do so. At the moment, i'm searching the web for other references. Just located this one: http://agham.asti.dost.gov.ph/1998/5th/fun/peejay/body.htm. Okay. I'll try out the signature procedure...another first, for me.

Seán Pòl Ó Creachmhaoil --Aodhdubh 12:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Donald_Henry_%27Bob%27_Burns updated. I notice that your earlier work on geocities is now only accessible via the way back machine. This is a great shame. all the best.ME 89.16.175.187 (talk) 12:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions and directions for where to ask questions if you don't understand how the template works are at the top of the list of specs. If the fields are left blank, they will simply not show up in the output. Deleting them creates extra work for users wanting to expand the specs. Furthermore, the WP:Air manual of style dictates only one set of specifications per page, for the most notable variant which was most definitely not the Mk.XII. Therefore, these specifications have been removed. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 00:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent :) I added Template:Naval cadets to it and added in the Bermuda link and flag. Easy template to edit. if you add any more Naval Cadet Organisations please add the template (and edit it to include them). It adds to the Category:Naval Cadet Organisations automatically Fiddle Faddle 21:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. I won't be adding any more Naval Cadet Organisations, though I'll be adding an army cadet one (Bermuda Cadet Corps).

Tapadh leibh. Aodhdubh 13:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see my discussion notes, under the header "Black Bermudians" so that we can discuss the passage on demographics. In short, I think a passage in there should be referenced before we can put it into the article. --D'Olivier 12:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. What do you think needs to be referenced, what type of reference would you accept, and to what end do you think it needs to be referenced, and how would the reference achieve that end?

Thanks for uploading Image:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly cease removing fact tags without actually providing support to the associated statement. Note I'm also going to remove the padding you've added to the SAS intro, it can go in later in the article, the intro is not the place.ALR 18:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you put it in later in the article, or did you just remove it. It doesn't need a fact tag. Any book on special forces, or on the SAS specifically, will say the same.

I've removed it, please look at the section further down the article and make your changes, they didn't suit a wholesale cut and paste. The point requires substantiation from a reliable source, at present it is merely opinion, and that applies to many of the books on the Regiment as well.ALR 18:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What would a reliable source be, then? If you mean an official government statement, that's not likely to exist. That the SAS has been the model for other forces certainly is part of historical record....the information you refer to further down the page aptly illustrates that. It's quality may be a subjective statement, but it's role modelling certainly isn't.

I just wanted to thank you for your additions to Bermuda International Airport. They really enhance the page and it's good to finally have some more information on this airport. I made a couple grammar edits to it, but excuse me if I am in the wrong. I also removed the stub templates because they are not needed now. Thanks. NcSchu 20:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bermuda Airport

You're very welcome. I'd put in pages on the airfield's previous lives as US Army/USAAF, USAF, USN bases, and on the other air stations in Bermuda, and eventually got round to adding to this one. I've trillions of pics as I was an airport policeman there, and I'll get around to tacking more in, perhaps. Aodhdubh 20:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really enjoyed your additions to the Sea Venture entry. May I ask your exact source of the information on the ship's probable construction in Aldeburgh in 1608 for £1,500? I am doing a research project on the Sea Venture and have never come across that information and would very much like to know the source. I see you list P. M. Wright's Sea Venture Story as a reference. Is that the source? I have never seen that book (just one library has it in the U.S.). Thanks very much. Seastories 10:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo. Feel free to write me at my e-mail.

Source is almoste certainly that pamphmlet, though I'll have to check. I've had a lot on my plate since writing that, but it's the only publication I remember checking. I have my own copy, and I'll happily scan it and email it to you (it's small). A late friend of mine wrote a biography on Sir George Somers that you may also find useful, though I'm not sure if it's still in print (Sir George Somers, a Man and His Time, by David F. Raine, Pompano publications). I have a copy, but it's too large to scan and e-mail, I think. I can point you in the right direction to finding a copy, though...

Aodhdubh 00:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bermuda_sloop_race.jpg could you please add what source you scanned to create this digital image? It looks like it was scanned from a book. Also, what does "(E M Gosling)" mean? Thanks - Davandron | Talk 14:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image was indeed scanned from an out-of-print book, "Sailing In Bermuda: Sail Racing in the Nineteenth Century", by J.C. Arnell. It covers the development of sail racing in Bermuda in the 19th Century (which involved racing working sloops on the weekends), and which gave rise to the development of scaled down, dedicated racers known as Bermuda Fitted dinghies. The author of the book collected photographs from many sources, which he credited. E M Gosling was either the original 19th Century photographer, or provided the print used in the book. That wasn't made clear in the book, though the latter is more likely.

Aodhdubh 04:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link to the text on the sloop foundation where it says this article is used with permission? It looks great, just want to make sure its not a copyright problem. Thanks - Davandron | Talk 05:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Erm?

Where it is used here with permission, or where it is used there with permission? I'll have a look, but I'm busy writing a Bermuda Fitted Dinghy article, just at the moment....

Aodhdubh 06:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, sorry... :^) I see the link now on the front page of the bermuda sloop website, so I assume its with permission. - Davandron | Talk 14:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I assumed so, also.

Aodhdubh 15:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, International One Design, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the "hook" for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on April 20 where you can improve it if you see fit. Note that the 20th is the last day of eligibility for this article, so hopefully you'll be around if there are any concerns. Regards, howcheng {chat} 06:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International One Design, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 21:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Diana_Dill-Life.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 14:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdub, I've seen the interesting Image:Bermudian sloop-of-war Flying Fish.jpg that you've uploaded. I'd like to use it in an article, but I'm pretty confused by the caption. You seem to be calling it both a Bermudian sloop and a Baltimore clipper. Could you clarify? And possibly also with respect to the Navy history? Thanks a lot, Ibn Battuta 03:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo...sure, but I must be brief, at the moment. The Navy began buying up Bermudian sloops from trade (note the Sting, which became HMS Pickle), as well as having some built to its requirements by Bermudian builders. As it was making a lot of effort at introducing standardised designs as classess, the Flying Fish design resulted partly from the desire for a commonality in these small ships. There was a lot of undeserved displeasure in the Navy with many of the Bermuda sloops due to their small size and lack of armament, and some scathing reports. These were unjustified as most were never intended to be fighting vessels, merely communications vessels, relying on their speed and maneouvrability both to quickly deliver communications, and to evade enemy vessels. In fact, the first three built for the navy (Hunder, Dash, and Driver) were built as fighting vessels, and were larger and better armed than vessels like the Pickle and the Whiting. There was some complaint that some of the shortcomings of later Bermudian-built vessels oredered by the navy were due to the Navy's attempts to design its own Bermuda sloop and have the Bermudian builders build it. It was suggested that, in future, the Navy out to simply issue specifications and allow Bermudian builders to create their own designs. Partly due to the misplaced dissatisfaction in some quarters with Bermudian designs, and partly as a result of the success of American privateers, it was decided to copy a captured Baltimore schooner which had had some success, the Flying Fish (the design of the American vessels had been strongly influenced by Bermudian traditions and boat builders in the preceding century, but were generally optimised for shallower, coastal waters) and the drawings made up from this vessel were issued to builders in both Bermuda and England. That's me writing from the top of my head, but I'll do a bit of reading up and amend/expand this later.

Aodhdubh 05:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdubh, thanks for your reply. That's really interesting! As for Flying Fish, I understand it was influenced by Bermudian sloops, but was not actually one itself; the boats built after its specifications, however, were built by Bermudian builders, so one might argue that they were, hm, at least "closer" to being Bermudian sloops? ... If you should be writing more on this topic at some point, I'd love to read it! --Ibn Battuta 19:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: As I'm about to upload the Flying Fish image to the Commons, would you think that changing the original title (containing the words "Bermudian sloop-of-war") to Flying_Fish_Baltimore clipper.jpg would be accurate? Likewise I've thought about changing the caption slightly (to spare you more user questions like mine :o)): Would that be okay?

Architectural drawing of the Flying Fish, a ship used by the Royal Navy.

Bermuda sloops were used by the navy in combatting French privateers, and as advice vessels, carrying communications and important materials. Inspired by the success of American privateers, however, the Admiralty used the Baltimore clipper Flying Fish as the model for a class of sloops, placing orders with boat builders in Bermuda and Britain. Although the American schooner's developments had been influenced by Bermudian vessels and builders, they were intended as coastal vessels, and were shallower drafted than comparably sized Bermudian designs (which were intended for the open ocean). - - - Thanks in advance, Ibn Battuta 20:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ibn...sure. I originally uploaded the image as part of the article on Bermuda sloops, but had second thoughts, myself, on its Bermudian-ness, so removed it from that article. If you're interested in the subject, try getting your hands on "The Andrew and the Onions", by Ian Strannack. Just make sure its a later, Bermuda Maritime Museum Press, edition....(I gave mine to the Imperial War Museum, but its now out of print, and the earlier, paperback edition, which I still have, leaves much to be desired).

Aodhdubh 00:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! I've uploaded the image to Commons accordingly... --Ibn Battuta 14:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:BVRC Edward VII Coronation Contingent.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a problem with your edits to gust and gust Corporation. It sounds good to make a disambiguation on gust and create Gust Corporation but it's not the appropriate way to move pages. As you can see [1], the history of gust incorporation has been lost, which is bad. In order to fix the problem, I've asked the assistance of an administrator [2]. -- Cenarium (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo...I wasn't happy with the relocation, either. It left the page Gust required for a redirect, and so unable to be used for a page on the literal definition of 'gust' - hence 'gusts'. I've run into a limitation of my know-how, and yield to those who know more than I do on this subject. Aodhdubh (talk) 02:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's settled, gusts redirects to gust which disambiguates and gust Corporation has been recreated. -- Cenarium (talk) 02:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. Tapadh leibh. Aodhdubh (talk) 02:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdubh,

I noticed you added a very large number of images to this article's "gallery" today. Please consider reducing the number, as having more than 2 doz. images in a gallery is really way too much. Thanks, JGHowes ^talk - 01:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Road, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.14:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Jeepday (talk)

Hi Aodhdubh,

Regarding your edits to the Virginia article: I understand that for a period of time in the seventeenth century the colonies were understood together, however, I strongly doubt the relevancy of that information's repeated inclusion in prominent places in the article. In the lead, the summary of the article, you added: "the second permanent English colony in the New World, Bermuda, was settled as a part of Virginia". While this may be true, I don't think it belongs in the article on the U.S. state of Virginia, let alone in the lead. A note is already included in the History section referencing Bermuda as part of the original definition of the geographic term Virginia. It is not, however, currently considered in the same way, and I will remove the statements about "Bermuda's inclusion within the boundaries of Virginia" to eliminate confusion and off-topic phrases. I strongly feel that this information takes away from the article, rather than adding to it, and would be better included in the History of Virginia article and the Bermuda article. I will leave the note about the Sea Venture in the colony subsection. If you want to discuss, this, let's do so on my talk page or the Talk:Virginia page.--Patrick Ѻ 21:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bermudian Banknotes.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Bermudian Pound Bank Notes.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 04:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the rigidity of copyright law, we have to be quite draconian on copyrighted images. In order to claim "fair use" one basically has to have a clear claim of irreplacability and necessity; your rationale for the use of this image didn't qualify, since the article is quite comprehensible without the image. I'm sorry that you're finding the process so frustrating. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Before I start, I'd just like to make a point that this is Wikipedia and not a place to accuse. As collaborators on the Wikipedia project, it is necessary to create an encouraging environment rather than a garrulous one you are attempting to create. Please do not use such brash language in the future. Thank you.

And now, to the issue of the Bermuda Coin images. You have licensed the images Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg under the Creative Commons and GNU licenses. Using these licenses mean that you have created the images yourself....completely and entirely. You created the image -yes, but not the coin. The image that you have uploaded depicts a coin which was copyrighted by a foreign nation. With the Creative Commons and GNU licenses, you are claiming that the coin of the foriegn nation was created by you and you now intend to share this 'work' in the public domain. Such constitues as a copyright infrigement and therefore your image is deleteable by (db-i9). Please read the page, Wikipedia:Non-free content, at the image section, to get a better idea of what this really means.

Rather than license your image under Creative Commons and GNU licenses, you should be licensing your image under the template {Non-free currency} and provide the appropriate fair use rationale. An example of the rationale used for foriegn currencies is seen in the page [[3]]. If you can fix the licensing and add fair use rationale, I will remove the deletion templates. Thank you.Fastily (talk) 06:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you, and you might have written what have now, regarding copyright of the coins, rather than the image of the coin, the first time...what I read in your initial objection was an accusation by you that I had plagiarised the image, or the text verbatim (wasn't clear which was intended), from a printed source, or another website. If that is not, or no longer, your objection, but that the coin itself is a copyright, and that any photograph of it is therefore violating said copyright (are you certain? That seems a bit wide-sweeping a definition...but I'll follow up on the links you posted), then that seems a more reasonable objection, and less like an attack on my character. If you read my reply to your objection as an attack on your own person, or your character, it was certainly not meant that way, and you'll have my apologies for words that could have perhaps been chosen more carefully.

Aodhdubh (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job!!! Your image now has proper rationale and proper licensing!!! :)

I have removed deletion tags and done some cleanup on the page. Your image is good to go. Fastily (talk) 07:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1959 Pattern Dennison Parachute Smock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:06 Sept 03 John Smith-s Bay 01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:06 Sept 03 John Smith-s Bay 01.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:06 Sept 03 John Smith-s Bay 01.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:09 June MMVI 104b.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hamilton Police Station.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DH Burns-Morgan House.jpg is now available as Commons:File:DH Burns-Morgan House.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 10 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please gain consensus in the talk page before re-inserting your edit, I have taken the text back to before the edit war. Regards, Justin talk 07:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there i have been trying to track this image for some time, its for a friend of mine whose great grandfather who stayed on the third boat, he would love to get a hi res version of this to get a print of it and frame it.

I would really appreciate it if you could help.

Thanks for your time.

Sean Millard —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanjm17 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Unfortunately, [4] is an image of an original, hand-coloured newspaper cutting, which I left in a frame, on my mother's wall, when I moved out of Bermuda several years ago. i don't think I've a much better copy on my hard-drive, and a better scan will have to wait for my next trip to Bermuda (not any time soon, alas). Keep in touch, though, and I'll see what I can do. Perhaps my brother can re-scan it. Aodhdubh (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I produced a copy of it while in Bermuda last summer, but have not been able to scan it as yet. I will load a high resolution version here to replace the existing scan as soon as I have managed that. Aodhdubh (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hallo Seán. I have uploaded a better version. The original was too large for a single scan so I have had to recompose it. I will doubtless return with a third and better scan, but for now, please visit the original image and click the link "Full resolution" ‎(2,940 × 657 pixels, file size: 513 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg). I suspect that in a matter of hours, the new version will replace the old as the display image. Aodhdubh (talk) 16:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm very impressed with the number of articles and especially the fine photo's you've taken. I see you wrote the St. Peter's Church, St. George's article, and the article states that it's "the oldest surviving Anglican church in continuous use outside the British Isles". I also spotted one of your photo's taken in 2006 and uploaded in 2007, that it's the "oldest surviving Anglican (before 1978, Church of England) church outside the British Isles". Where did you get this info? The plaque outside the church says "Western Hemisphere". Thanks for any help or light you can shed on this. --HighKing (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Hallo. That information is well known in \bermuda, and available from a variety of local publications. Scouring it from exo-Bermudian sources is more difficult. If you go to the Anglican Communion of Bermuda's web page for St. Peter's Church (http://www.anglican.bm/j3r.html), and click history, at least a little information is found there. Aodhdubh (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A very nice expansion of the stub, indeed. It not only tells Spurling's story, but gives unexpected insight into Bermuda's participation in World War I.

Are you going to add some more cites? The assessors will expect more.

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I cannot remember if I did, or not. If not, I will do so when I have time. Aodhdubh (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Bermuda sloop work boat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Bermuda sloop - privateer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hallo. I've no idea who painted this. Its been frequently reproduced, over the last century, but the original artist's identity appears lost. I didn't paint it, obviously, though the photograph is my own creaion. So amended. Aodhdubh (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Air Observation Post, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Airborne Observation Post. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am looking to use this image - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bermuda_Regiment_IS_Training.jpg for a documentary on National Geographic. I was wondering if you could pass any details on to me by email or if you could sign a release form for world wide rights.

Thanks, Niall

niallharkin@thegammaproject.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niall J Harkin (talk • contribs) 12:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdubh. I appreciate (looking at your user page) that the subject of Bermuda is probably one close to your heart, but please bear in mind that the British Empire article is an overview of 400 years of history across seven continents. In such a summary article, it's impossible to give each former colony, not to mention each current BOT, the space it deserves, but that's OK because we have hyperlinks to more in depth articles. In this case, the reader can click on Bermuda to find out that it was AKA Somers Isle, and from there they can navigate to, e.g. History of Bermuda or St. George's, Bermuda. The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick ^t 00:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1983 Bermudian Dollar & UK Pound Coins.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oona Chaplin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nicholas Bayard Dill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George James Bruere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Henry Tucker

Thomas Tudor Tucker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Henry Tucker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed that the BL 9.2 inch Gun Mk X article that you have created, might be merged with BL 9.2 inch gun Mk IX–X. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion here. Many thanks. Alansplodge (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I have no objection and have just completed the merger myself. Aodhdubh (talk) 13:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contribution - you seem to know what you are talking about. Have you been to gib or just well read? Victuallers (talk) 08:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Hallo. Thank you. I have never been to Gibraltar, however. My additions to the article actually all were mentions of the surviving examples of the BL 9.2 Mk. X found in batteries in Bermuda, as the article had indicated the only surviving examples still mounted were to be found in Gibraltar. Aodhdubh (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of films featuring the Irish Republican Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:International_One_Design_-_Hamilton_Harbour_-_Bermuda.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bermuda-Harbour_and_Town_of_St_George.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.5.71 (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warwick Camp (Bermuda), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, Just letting you know that I've used your Wikipedia photo 'Featherbed Alley Printshop Bermuda' in my presentation "Changes in media production and distribution which have led to the development of Creative Commons" I've used it as a slide background then as part of a remix at the end of the presentation. You can view it here: http://slidesha.re/YAFdTE Thank you! Hol gro (talk) 22:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Holly[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. George's, Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Gates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert John Simmons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the doctor says he may probably live. His company suffered very much. Poor good and brave Sergeant (Joseph D.] Wilson of his company [H], after killing four rebels with his bayonet, was shot through the head

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermuda Militia Artillery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sports and recreation in Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rowing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bermuda Flying School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to RAF Transport Command, and was later shot down, becoming a prisoner-of-war in Germany. <ref>[http://stbees.org.uk/history/war/ww2/rodgers.htm St Bees Dead of World War II. Roll of Honour:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Privateer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The History Of The Island From 1784 to 1901'', Dr Henry Wilkinson, Oxford: Oxford University Press]</ref>((Who|date=November 2008)) captaining two sloops, carried out the only attack on Bermuda

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical Age (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Privateer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Spanish War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Tempest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Gates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White's Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

United States Army Bermuda Garrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chesapeake, Home Guard and Admiralty House

The Fairmont Hamilton Princess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Flying

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bermuda Regiment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the [[Cinque Ports]] Training Area (CPTA); part of the [[Defence Training Estate]] (DTE) South-East) near [[Dover]]. <ref>Ministry of Defence [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Evadne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minesweeper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Craughwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bermudian

Denmark Vesey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bermudian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Airport Security Policeman (Bermuda).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Airport Security Police patch.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment Corporal's Mess 1992.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda-Cabinet Office and Senate.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment - Warwick Camp.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment - Lieut.-Col. William White.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Cedar belfry tree in Bermuda.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermudianised Gaff Rig.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment - Football Game at Warwick Camp.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda-House of Assembly and Supreme Court.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Rifles Uniform.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment - Training Company PSI and Senior NCOs - Warwick Camp 1992.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Cedar at Scaur Hill Fort.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Regiment - Warwick Camp 1993.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:14, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bermuda Fitted Dinghy - Hamilton Harbour.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Bonny Lane - Peru.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Evadne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am very interested in developing the wikipedia community in Bermuda. I would like to get the colleges and schools involved. Teach them about wikipedia, have them learn from it and contribute.

I see you have done a lot of work here, are you still in Bermuda? Would be great to learn more from you about the wikipedia community here in Bermuda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swfiua (talk • contribs) 12:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - When you get a moment do you think you could add some in line references to this excellent article which was mostly written by you? Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure. Much of what I've written here I have repeated in other articles with references, so I can do so by copy-and-paste rather quickly...when I get a moment. Aodhdubh (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds good. I have inserted a few references myself but it could do with a few more. It is a great article! Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strongbow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bermuda Militia Infantry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• War'']. By [[Edward Harris (archaeologist)|Dr. Edward Cecil Harris]]. The Royal Gazette.</ref><ref>[http://www.bermudaregiment.bm/history/history The Bermuda Regiment website: ''Brief History of the
• bm/history/history The Bermuda Regiment website: ''Brief History of the Bermuda Regiment''}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to British Army order of precedence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Regiment of Artillery]], preceded the [[Bermuda Volunteer Rifle Corps]] (BVRC), raised in 1894). Today, the [[Bermuda Regiment]], an amalgam of the BMA and BVRC, is ordered 28th. <ref>The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermuda Militia Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Army. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Irish diaspora may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20((subst:REVISIONUSER))&section=new my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• his legendary voyage; a local [[psychiatric hospital]] (since renamed) was named after him. <ref>[http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1954/01/02/1954 01 02 052 tny cards 000242733 The New Yorker. 2

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Ambuscade (F172), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bermuda rig may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• years (to the resentment of many of his competitors, who were forced to emulate his designs). <ref>[http://www.academia.edu/3742951/Ships slaves and slipways towards an archaeology of shipbuilding in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermuda rig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Gazette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conscription in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Army. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have been admiring your photography, and occasionally I move pictures to from en: to Commons (I only really pop over to Wikipedia to scout for pictures for Commons and things of specific interest).

There are very few picture (as far as I can see) of Bermuda's multitudinous little islands, which is a pity as there is nothing better to liven an article up. It may be that people in Bermuda have realized how valuable pictures of the islands are and are loathe to donate them to a free picture library!

Another growing project, which takes its pictures from Commons, has as yet just a few islands listed (here, and I am not sure that its "Greek Letter Islands" might not be a made-up name). If there were a source for pictures, or someone with a boat and a camera and a generous frame of mind, then this could be built up.

Hogweard (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I have many photographs of smaller islands in Bermuda. Actually, my brother is the proprietor of a boating company, which I work for when Aodhdubh (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC) at home, and that has certainly made it easier taking photographs from the water. You might want to look at a map of Bermuda and let me know which islands you'd like photographs of, then I'll see what I have of them.[reply]

• • I just looked at that link. Be aware that many, probably most, islands in Bermuda have more than one name. I probably have photographs of varying quality of most of the islands between the Great Sound and Hamilton Harbour. I'll try to upload some tonight. Aodhdubh (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll look forward to that and see how they can brighten an article or two. I love the idea that even in a small territory you can't agree on the names of the islands. Why should there be drab conformity? Next time someone argues about whether to use the Welsh-language name or the English-language name for a river or mountain, I will appeal to the Bermudian solution. Hogweard (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Apologies. I have none of the Greek Letter Islands, it seems, except perhaps as distant specks in the background. I have a great many of those East of Hawkins'. Aodhdubh (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any photos you've got would be welcome. (Is the name "Greek Letter Islands" one that wikifolk made up, or is it actually used?) Hogweard (talk) 13:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Bermudians in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Bermudians in the CEF. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermudians in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Admiralty House, Bermuda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Murray, John Warren and Spanish Point. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening,

Thank you for adding a infobox to RNAS Boaz Island (HMS Malabar), however the infobox template you added was "Infobox military unit" which should only used for unit articles hence the name. For military installations you should use "Infobox military installation". Gavbadger (talk) 16:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I noticed you had added some unsourced material to Herbert Kitchener, 1st Earl Kitchener which is an assessed article. Please feel free to reinsert but please add an inline citation per WP:SOURCE. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlyle Crockwell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St. George's, Gunner and Western Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit to the page Soccer in Canada, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to British Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ||An ''Independent Company'' (two officers and fifty-four other ranks detached from the [[2nd Regiment of Foot]] of the [[English

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Falkland Islands Defence Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parachute Regiment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I notice you have added unsourced material to this article which had previously been fully sourced. Please feel free to reinsert but please add sources. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Sorry to be a pain but I think you also created Admiralty House, Bermuda. Please can you add sources to that article as well (as required by WP:SOURCE). Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure. I'll try to do so in the next day or so. Aodhdubh (talk) 23:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you want to change name of Bermuda Regiment to Royal Bermuda Regiment then you should start WP:Requested move discussion. If it is uncontroversial or obvious move then you should have moved page to Royal Bermuda Regiment. But still you can ask for deletion of redirect Royal Bermuda Regiment and can move the page. Creating duplicate page is against Wikipedia policy. --Human3015^TALK  01:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, by looking at some sources it seems very uncontroversial move and in article itself "Royal" is used so I have moved the page. --Human3015^TALK  02:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermudians in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bullock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Outerbridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Palace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please could you add some citations to your excellent additions to the equipment section of this article. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Irish diaspora may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Bay fisherman named ''Daniel Seon'' (''Sheehan''). A later Daniel Seon was appointed Clerk of the [[House of Assembly of Bermuda|House of Assembly] and Prothonotary of the Court of General Assize in

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Royal Bermuda Regiment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the Belgian SS109 variant of the American M193 was adopted as [[5.56×45mm NATO|5.56mm NATO]].<ref>[ss109.com 5.56mm (.223) ''PARAMILITARY AMMUNITION'', by John Schaefer. Rifle magazine, January/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bermuda into History of Bermuda. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bermuda Militia Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Mary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fenian Rising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Tucker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Tucker (President of the Council of Bermuda), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dunedin

added a link pointing to Gaelic

Robert John Simmons

added a link pointing to William Carney

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somers Isles Company, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Parliamentarian and Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bermuda Triangle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bertram and Diana Firestone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place ((subst:Dobos Torte)) on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bermuda Crown 1964.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_9mZtj3UizINyogB&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

New York City draft riots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bermudian

Robert John Simmons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jamestown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York City draft riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folly Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chicano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chulo

Pink House (Charleston, South Carolina) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charleston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chulo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Glyn Gilbert and Field Marshall Montgomery.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not saying anything negative. The above sections are only to warn you about the messy rules that exist for some articles. O3000 (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tupac (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defunct (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charleston, South Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, William Campbell (British Army officer and Governor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you add a source for your recent edits. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Governor of Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 88th Regiment of Foot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

No. 263 Squadron RAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bermudian

Royal Air Force, Bermuda (1939–45) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bermudian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No. 263 Squadron RAF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Campbell (British Army officer and Governor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert John Simmons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Fusiliers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chatham and Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boaz Island, Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Governor of Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casting lots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Gambier, 1st Baron Gambier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bermudian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdubh, I saw this photo you added to SMS Falke, but there's no source for it. Where did you scan it from and how do you know it was created by the British government? Parsecboy (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bermuda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 02:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aodhdubh! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Bermuda that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 02:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited African Methodist Episcopal Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of Bermuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stevenson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bermuda Garrison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Moxy 🍁 15:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Charles Wolferstone, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I noticed Patrickneil, at the edit 986906322, undid your edit adding the reference to “Virgineola” explaining, “is this aside relevant to Virginia history? is it sourced?" - - first of all, just as a matter of orientation for verification online alone, I cannot see the page referenced linked to the Vollmann source past pp.695, but the cited page is a sort of glossary, and 'Virgineola' may well be located just out of my browser snippet view nested in the 'Virginia' description.

I wanted to discus my reply to Patrickneil with you first: side-bar: “Virgineola” redirects to Bermuda, but it might better be redirected to History of Bermuda. While that wikipedia-editing would be a new learning experience for me, if you are agreed, I'd be interested in learning how to do it with you.

1. The obvious "relevance to Virginia history" is that widower John Rolfe proceeds from Bermuda to Jamestown and tobacco ...

- I think the information inside a parentheses should be reduced to an article Note, using the following: ((efn|Initially the name applied to the entire coastal region from South Carolina to Maine, plus the island of [[Bermuda]] (itself originally named ''Virgineola'', though this was soon changed to ''The Somers Isles'', which remains official though the older Spanish name of ''Bermuda'' has resisted replacement).((sfn|Vollmann|2002|pp=695–696)))), or a different confirmed reference as required. Because this is commonly held information, a topic search in Hathi Trust could easily find an alternative citation.

I suggest that the information is also relevant at Virginia colony. The Virgineola name is given by the Virginia Company at about the same time their initial settlement is made in New England, as noted in the contribution.

2. When George Washington stopped growing tobacco to become financially independent from the London tobacco factors, he traded his wheat to Bermuda. The wheat was grown by enslaved farm managers who dealt directly with the Bermuda merchants. --- In his will, Washington granted land for self-sufficient family farms to his freedmen just west of Mount Vernon. The land is still held by their descendants in a single-family home development nearby Mount Vernon; several rebuilt or expanded with GI loans a generation ago.

- And by the way, while I am here, thank you for your service. With regards, TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 01:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diocese of Newfoundland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trinity Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Militia Artillery units of the United Kingdom and Colonies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tyrone and Tipperary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Shah (1873), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you add the missing citations to your addition to this article? The extra material also seems to be largely about the Royal Anglian Regiment rather than the Royal Lincolnshire Regiment. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you insert the missing citations to your additions to this article. A lot of work was undertaken several years ago to ensure that this was a fully sourced article and sadly there is now quite a lot of unsourced material again. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This picture needs a source; self-scanned doesn't cut it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you add some references to the material you have added. I have added one reference myself but it needs more. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Units of the British Army, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British Expeditionary Force and 1st Army Corps.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to United States Fleet Forces Command, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - wolf 13:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• btw- this is not a revert, it is just being obnoxious. We get it, you don't like being reverted, but source your edits from now on and it shouldn't be a problem. - wolf 23:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As your page is now 161+Kb, with 155 entries, going back 15 years, you may want to start archiving some of it's content. FYI - wolf 13:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been on WP for 15 years with almost 10,000 edits, surely you know by now that you can't add unsourced content. And once it has been removed, you certainly can't add it again, along with the demand that others "look it up". Per WP:VERIFYOR, the obligation is on you to properly source any content you add, when you add it. Additionally, you added the exact same unsourced paragraph to HMS Castle Harbour, and also made unsourced additions to Northeast Air Command and Convoy HX 84, all after this notification. These diffs are just from today, I hope that this isn't indicative of your previous edits. You need to properly source any content you add, as you add it. Wikipedia's reputation relies on properly sourced content, and the project relies on its experienced editors to help maintain that policy, or else it becomes nothing more than a blog, of little value. - wolf 19:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I was going to say the same thing. Please, please add the citations as you go along. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Battle of the Atlantic are heavily biased toward coverage of Bermuda. This unbalances the whole article. See WP:PROPORTION. If you want some ideas on how to implement that, the amount of coverage of Bermuda in the article should be roughly the same as in the generalist sources on the subject. Just to give you a clue on that, The War for the Seas, by Evan Mawdsley (covers all of WW2 at sea) mentions Bermuda only twice, and then only very briefly. The book does, however, have substantial coverage of the Battle of the Atlantic; also The Battle of the Atlantic by Marc Milner also happens to mention Bermuda just twice, and in each case simply to give a relative position in the Atlantic.

You are going to be very upset when all your Bermuda-centric text gets deleted, so I respectfully suggest you stop adding to it. If you feel a need to write this stuff, how about starting an article on Bermuda in World War II - as I have already suggested on the article talk page. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a lot about Bermuda (though I've only touched on a number of points, while neglecting to mention others). It tends to be overlooked by many historians as no shots were fired there, but its importance to the Battle of the Atlantic and the war more generally, was out of all proportion to its size. I'll tone it down a bit when I get a moment, unless someone else cares to do that beforehand. I'll give thought to the Bermuda in World War II suggestion, although that is a broader subject and would be a substantial undertaking which I'm too hard-pressed to do at the moment. I've only just finished adding the references to what I've written today....or rather, yesterday, now. If you see anything I've missed a reference for, let me know (but I do not check this talk page every day, so may take a while to respond).Aodhdubh (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion but, you could start the Bermuda in WWII article in your User:Aodhdubh/sandbox. Every user has a sandbox, it's one of your user pages. You could, for example, take all that content from Battle of the Atlantic, and any other Bermudian military history content from other pages, and place it all on that page. It's yours. No one else will touch it. It doesn't show up in searches, so readers won't find it. You can work on whatever you want, including building that article, and you can do it at your own pace, with no interference. Take as long as you like and whenever you feel your article is ready, you just move it. You should check it out. There is a template there with more information. (just my 0.02¢) - wolf 05:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have probably noticed that all your edits on Battle of the Atlantic have now been reverted by another user (who, I believe, is an administrator). I am just checking that you know you can go to the edit history of the article and open any old versions of it so that you can copy any material that you want to your sandbox. That way you can use that material elsewhere, if appropriate. Be careful that you do not accidentally save the old version of the page, as that would have the effect of reverting the big revert and risks putting you in an edit war with an administrator. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at HMS Castle Harbour. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 13:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I created HMS Castle Harbour, so can hardly be disruptively editing it. What edit precisely are you referring to? Aodhdubh (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fact that you created the article is irrelevant and per WP:OWN, gives you no special rights. You are still subject to the same policies & guidelines as everyone else on that, and any other pages you may have created, or any content you have contributed. This and this had already been removed once, in just the past 24 hrs, yet you re-added both. Just because you didn't do it by way of revert, does not mean it's not tendentious, and no different than your edit-warring at United States Fleet Forces Command. In both my edit summaries I encouraged you to go to the talk page, as I've done numerous times now, yet you refuse to discuss disputed content. And after all this, you finally post a comment, and it's to ask a question about a warning template? A question I suspect you already knew the answer to. Look, I know you do a lot of reading, so you're not a dumb person, and I noticed you mentioned you were a police officer, so you know about following the rules and keeping things orderly - the opposite of disruption. So let's not waste each other's time, ok? How about you take up TIR's suggestion, and take all that content you dumped into Battle of the Atlantic, and use it to create Bermuda during WWII? (and use my ref suggest below while you're at it), and I'll go back to my watchlist... and we'll call it a day. - wolf 20:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Added note

You're editing is becoming tendentious. This applies to multiple articles. You have repeatedly edit warred over disputed content and so far have refused to engage in any discussion - anywhere. Other editors have now taken notice of your behavior and have brought it to the attention of the community. You can consider this post as part of the process to file a complaint against you, seeking sanctions which may include topic bans or a block, if you continue with your disruptive editing and refusal to engage. - wolf 13:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure by now you've seen all the refs that I've filled in on HMS Castle Harbour, after you added them. If you are going to continue adding refs (and we hope you do), you should fill them in per WP:CITE. The way you've been adding them is no longer used, per WP:CS:EMBED (and in some cases no longer permitted, per WP:ELPOINTS). You are creating unneeded work for other editors and making it more difficult for readers to source content. - wolf 14:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You learn something new every day. Trying the CITE tag now.Aodhdubh (talk) 19:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your recent edits to that page, I have started a discussion, addressed to you, on the article's talk page at Talk:HMS Castle Harbour#Boat vs island. As some of the content you've added is now in dispute, is it expected that you will join the discussion and discuss this content. All Wikipedia users are expected to engage, using the talk pages. (There have been editors at ANI blocked for refusing to talk.) I've also noted that you have left lengthy summaries with some of these edits (eg: [5] & [6]), instead you should be using the talk page, so you can dialog, instead of posting a monolog. Please join in. Thank you - wolf 07:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come across your edit. It's a remarkable borderline interpretation of WP:CIVIL and WP:REFERENCES, but it's also really quite confused about what you might mean by "command of the Atlantic," which, no doubt in this case might be expected to mean naval, Navy, vessels, since this is an article about the U.S. Atlantic Fleet.

I've step-by-step stripped out about four references which have nothing whatsoever to do with the paragraph of claims; what remains is a link to a U.S. official war history, which talks about merchant ship control zones, which yes eventually ended up being divided up between Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Atlantic Fleet; United States Tenth Fleet, directly under Admiral King himself, and Commander-in-Chief, Western Approaches, in Liverpool.

But again, this is an article about fleet, warship, naval, forces, and nothing in u:Aodhdubh's references says anything about Royal Navy vessels or commands being placed under U.S. command. This is the first time I've ever heard that SBNO Western Atlantic might have been placed under CINCLANTFLT.

I would really invite u:Aodhdubh to carefully reconsider his claims, and if they're true, reference them. I would also like to remind you that references should be added when the claim is added, in accordance with WP:BURDEN. cc Thewolfchild. Buckshot06 (talk) 15:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Artillery Cap Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 03:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Wolferstone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charles Wolferstone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the ((db-afc)), ((db-draft)), or ((db-g13)) code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. After all the activity that took place back in February, I had hoped you would take up the suggestion of several editors here and start collating all of your Bermuda/WWII content into a potential article (ie: Bermuda during World War II). Despite some of the issues noted, don't think your contributions are unwanted. You had indicated this subject was important to you and it would be a shame for all that effort to go waste. Have a nice day - wolf 14:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Corps Warrant, 1926 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a repository for all historic documents. No claims of notability for this subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Corps Warrant, 1926 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EpicPupper (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have been looking at this article: it is currently very poorly sourced and needs thinning out. I noticed that you had added much of the material and wondered if you would like to add some citations before any thinning out occurs? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice you've been adding a lot of content to this article, but much of it is not sourced. Anyone, at any time, could just come along and remove all those additions. I won't, but someone else might. Please just consider this as a friendly reminder that you need to add sources with your additions. It would be unfortunate if all that work was for nothing. - wolf 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yamaha RS motorcycle variants, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Legislative council

added a link pointing to Executive Council

War Office

added a link pointing to Gold Coast

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Colonial Office, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to say the same thing. Please stop ignoring our guidelines. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aodhdubh! Your additions to Bermudian Militia, Volunteer and Territorial Units of the British Army, 1894-1965 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legislative council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Council.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western Redoubt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Admiralty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I have changed the text you introduced into our article about British Overseas Territories citizens on 29 July 2021.

I was baffled by your "conferring CUKC on CUKC" phrase. Was this a typo or, if not, would you explain or change it to something less baffling?

Thanks for your sterling work throughout the decades!

PS: Do you still understand Irish (or Scots Gaelic) ? --05:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC) BushelCandle

The phrase seems odd, possibly a typo, but CUKC is "Citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies". fyi - wolf 11:11, 24 August 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Yes, I realise that but the phrase still baffles me if it is not a typo. --12:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC) BushelCandle

Hi - Please can you take a look at WP:LEAD: the lead should be a summary of the article and not introduce new material. Also, as mentioned many, many times, any new material should be properly sourced so please read WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caribbean Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Flying Cross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aodhdubh. You seem to like to enrich your citations with footquotes (e.g. "your" article Imperial fortress). Sometimes users then come along and delete them as needless (e.g. "excessive and unnecessary quotation within the citations" in "your" article John Mitchel). The same happens to me. However WP:FOOTQUOTE says:

"A footnote may also contain a relevant exact quotation from the source. This is especially helpful when the cited text is long or dense. A quotation allows readers to immediately identify the applicable portion of the reference. Quotes are also useful if the source is not easily accessible."

What can we do to defend ourselves? Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannes Schade: if you don't get a response here, I would suggest you repost your question to the WikiProject: Military History discussion page. In fact, you should probably post it there now anyway. (imho) - wolf 00:41, 9 September 2021 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

You seem to have created a series of Royal Yacht Club stubs like Royal British Virgin Islands Yacht Club using 4 quotes around the club name in the title. Two quotes gives italics, three gives bold, five gives bold and italic, but four gives bold and a single quote, which isn't necessary. Please don't continue to do this. Thanks. (The articles all seem to need more sources, too.) PamD 22:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I've run across some confusing text in the article English Civil War#English overseas possessions. Doing a little research, it appears you added the section back in May 2016. I've also noticed that you've recently been working on English overseas possessions in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, which is much more extensive and better written. Figuring that the first article was a much earlier effort of yours, and that you've done a lot more research since then, I thought I'd give you a heads up on your talk page rather than publicly tagging the older article. I thought giving you a heads up and inviting you to update the earlier article would be more productive than just tagging the article or trying to straighten it out myself.

The point in question is this: "The Parliament began assembling a fleet to invade the Royalist colonies, but many of the English islands in the Caribbean were captured by the Dutch and French in 1651 during the Second Anglo-Dutch War." The first thing to catch my attention was the fact that the second A-D war was in 1665, over a decade after the fact. There was a first A-D war in 1652-1654, but that appears to have been mainly fought in the English Channel, not in the West Indies. In English overseas possessions in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms#The Caribbean, it is stated: "Over the next month Barbados was blockaded. Dutch ships were seized, an act which would be one of the causes of the First Anglo-Dutch War." That makes a lot more sense.

I am far from a subject matter expert in the West Indies, my interest is more in the Maritimes. I came across the older article seeking some background info to help set my project in proper context. The newer (3 Kingdoms) article, in the section Northern Colonies is of particular interest, especially the 4th paragraph, about the diversion of the New England forces from the first A-D war to the second seizure of Nova Scotia. That was exactly the kind of context I was looking for. While I realize that wasn't your contribution, I am most grateful for that observation, it's very helpful.

At any rate, I'd like to invite you to take another look at the older article, and see if you can provide a better written summary. Besides the obvious factual problem, the older article also cites no references in that section. I hope you can find the time to give us a concise update in the older, broader article. I'm sure your work in the past five years has given you a better understanding of the period and you can provide a better summary now. Thanks! 2001:558:6017:107:D5B4:958E:C45E:CAE4 (talk) 09:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been active, but haven't responded or edited the article in question. I've gone ahead and tagged it for the time being, and hope you can find time to address it later. 2001:558:6017:107:D5B4:958E:C45E:CAE4 (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bermudian Militia, Volunteer and Territorial Units of the British Army, 1894-1965, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 07:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you get to the point where you're getting ready to resubmit this article, could you consider perhaps changing the article title to a shorter one? The current one is both unwieldy and an unlikely search target. This was briefly discussed at milhist and a pair of editors there agreed that shorter would be better (something like "Bermudian units of the British Army", or similar). If need be, the matter can be raised again at wt:milhist, if you need assistance with the title. Good luck with your article - wolf 08:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of oldest buildings in the Americas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Royal British Virgin Islands Yacht Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Yacht clubs in the British Virgin Islands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Geoffry Scoones. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 13:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reginald Scoones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London Regiment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Royal Channel Islands Yacht Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Royal London Yacht Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Royal County of Berkshire Yacht Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Yacht clubs in the Isle of Wight indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Yacht clubs in Jersey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Yacht clubs by in the Channel Islands indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 18:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yamaha RS motorcycle variants".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. There has been quite a bit of activity on this page of late, but no responses from you, despite the fact that you have been actively editing. Do you intend to reply to anyone, at all?
2. This was mentioned before, but I'll ask again; your talk page is now a lengthy 214+Kb, with 197 entries. This can create problems, and as such, it is recommended you archive your talk page. Will you consider doing this? - wolf 03:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Yacht clubs in the Crown Dependencies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Army, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 07:59, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You recently added an image to the Royal Navy article that included extensive content in the caption that went well beyond describing what was in the image. As such, I've removed some of that content and trimmed the caption down to make it more on point. That said, your efforts need not be wasted. If you so chose, you could add any relevant information from your edit (and more) to the prose of either that or another related article. As you know, it is still available to you in the page history (or just use the diff I linked above).

Also, while I'm here, I'll take this opportunity to again ask if you plan to ARCHIVE your talk page any time soon? It now has 216+ Mb of content, 200+ sections going back to 2006. For some users, this makes it slow to load and difficult to navigate. If you need assistance with this, just ask. You can even have a bot do it all for you. (fyi) - wolf 18:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bermudian Militia, Volunteer and Territorial Units of the British Army, 1894-1965, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add images with very long unsourced captions. Thank you.Dormskirk (talk) 11:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demographics of Ireland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal British Virgin Islands Yacht Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for: 2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/

-- Environment of New York City Task Force - Wil540 art (talk) 21:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ó Creachmhaoil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaelic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal British Virgin Islands Yacht Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your edits to British Army has been reverted. You are welcome to come to the talk page to discuss it, at Talk:British Army#Colonial units. Thank you - wolf 18:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English overseas possessions in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Channel Islands Yacht Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal London Yacht Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal County of Berkshire Yacht Club, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed today you were actively editing articles, but you still haven't edited any talk pages since last February, and even then, haven't responded to a talk page post since early January. You haven't responded to any of the numerous posts here on your own talk page since February of last year. There have been 55 separate threads posted here since, and while many of them may not require a reply, some of them do. There are issues with edits you've made, and articles you've created, (examples of both can be found at Bermudians in the Canadian Expeditionary Force). When editors take the time and effort to discuss these issues with you, it is expected that you'll respond, (see WP:Communication is required). Please take the time to go through the threads here that you have not yet replied to, and check any pings you've received to other talk pages, but have not replied to, and do those editors the courtesy of giving them a reply. I would also strongly suggest you review all the articles you've created for possible issues, such as notification templates for sourcing, layout, writing style, etc., and make improvements where needed.

On another note, while I'm here, I will take a moment to again mention that your talk page is continuing to bloat and is now at 214 sections and ≈230Kb. Pages that size can cause issues for your fellow users. I have previously suggested going to H:ARC, but if it will make it easier, just go to:
User talk:Aodhdubh/Archive 1, add an ((aan)) template at the top, then start moving content from this page to that one, until you reach, say... 100Kb. Then move on to User talk:Aodhdubh/Archive 2, and lather, rinse, repeat. As soon as you save the first archive page, an index will automatically appear at the top of this page, (easy-peasy, right?) Have a nice day - wolf 23:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal London Yacht Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal Channel Islands Yacht Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aodhdubh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Royal County of Berkshire Yacht Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Google Maps, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. I am troubled that you added a section onto Google Maps without any sources and written as purely original research. This needs to be avoided in the future. – The Grid (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two months ago, this past June, I posted a comment (just above at #Communication+) regarding your ongoing refusal to enagage with other editors here on Wikipedia. Since that post, you have made 147 edits, yet only one of those was to a talk page (this edit regarding a page move at Bermuda skink, where you replied to your own post and were the only editor to take part in that discussion.) I will again ask that you make an effort to engage more with other editors on the project's various talk pages (article, user, wikiproject, etc). Thank you. - wolf 19:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What was the point of this edit summary: "replace persons removed by Thewolfchild". You know full well that content needs to be supported by reliable sourcing, which you failed to do in the first place. That unsourced content was removed only after numerous warnings and attempts to enagage with you, during which you continuously refused to respond or source the content you added in the first place. Then only after I cleaned up that article, do you finally react, but only to source a partial amount of the content, and then add that comment as if you were fixing some sort of problem I caused. When others clean up your messes, don't attack them for it. It looks foolish. - wolf 18:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Royal Navy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the Bermuda-related info that you're adding to my ship articles, but they need to be sourced lest they get deleted. An example would be the cricket match referenced in the HMS Carnarvon article. A nice little tidbit, but not in the only source given for that paragraph.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Royal Naval Dockyards indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Royal Navy in the Cold War indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Royal Naval Dockyard, Bermuda indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shore establishments of the Royal Navy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion about the very large quotations in citations that you have added in some recent edits at WP:WikiProject_Military_history - here. Your comments would be helpful.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]