Welcome to my talk page, the requests must be done here.

Hello, Aquinasthomes1,

Thank you for creating Mardarije Uskoković.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

*

• This page does not have enough references
• This page does not have inline links to substantiate information. There is too much text w/o sources.
• The first link is a dead link.
• Kindly attend to these matters

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Whiteguru)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aquinasthomes1! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Curbon7 (talk) 04:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you by chance the IP user that sends the Serbian mil bio drafts through Articles for Creation? Curbon7 (talk) 04:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Slavski kolač, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, AT1! This food item does appear to be notable -- any food traditionally prepared as part of a sacrament or major celebration is almost certainly a notable food. But we have to prove that, and a recipe isn't enough. The source also looks like a blog, which isn't an RS for discussion of the food. What we need is someone in a reliable source discussing the food itself -- its history, why it's important in this sacrament, etc. Is that something you're able to find? For me it's difficult because I don't speak the language, don't know alternate names for this food, etc., but I'm always happy to help with notable food items. Sometimes cookbooks, in addition to giving recipes, will discuss the food itself. —valereee (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Slavski kolač. Thanks! —valereee (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've added sources and moved this to article space. —valereee (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 4 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sevastijan Dabović, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that bishop Nikolaj Velimirović called Sevastijan Dabović the greatest Serbian missionary of modern times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sevastijan Dabović. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sevastijan Dabović), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring, as you did at Serbia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Vanjagenije (talk) 14:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aquinasthomes1, on Sept 11, you called InNeed95 a vandal [who] is an albanian neonazi anti-Serb racist (ANI diff). If you have proof of that, you may submit it in the form of WP:DIFFs below, with a concise summary attached. Otherwise, I've set the duration of your block not to expire. Please note that I will view a lengthy reply that isn't pointed and condensed as effectively evading scrutiny and will therefore disregard. Thank you. El_C 16:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@El C: Its abhorrent injust. I literally explained that in the noticeboard. You are defending vandals. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. InNeed95 just editwarring Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm asking that you explain it again, briefly. Condense to the most obvious, salient fact (singular). Please don't squander this opportunity with protestations. It is for naught. El_C 17:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@EL C: Ok, I read about Diff and did a resume. InNeed95 vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act, removing the Greek name which is sourced here; here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act, Albanianize Serb names, and that it is wrong, because in Kosovo the two languages are official here; here; here; here; here; here; here; here; example of Whitewashing here Even the monasteries wich name is the name of local (a serb name because it is a an serbian church) here; here; He visibly disrespect the source, modifiying the stable term “terrorist” (claimed by CIA, EU, UN, and Interpol) to “separatist’ to grace POV the image of military UÇK propaganda here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act by manipulating Serb population data, he continued to vandalize and edit warring here; He do it again, but in serb diaspora here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act, denying Greek origin, and Stalking here; here; here; He vandalized inserting an text without sources, with racial motivate bias to say indirectly that Albanians are descended from Illyrians (the same type of Nazi Germany that said that Germans were descended from the Aryan race, the same with Italian Fascism that said that Italians were descendants of roman race) (Very common) here; He Continued to vandalize, even though the talk page consensus that InNeed95 created says that is wrong here; here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist motivation to manipulate the article, with EDIT WARRING and Disruptive edits here; here; ; here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act, removing a lot of text about a racist act (case of a politician calling the Czechs who respect serbian victims, as disgusting serbs) that is sourced. here; Example of abuse and disrespect with the Wiki Rules here; Racist Attack and Harassment here; Edit Summary with racist intonation here; CANVASSING with albanian language nationalism example here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-nationalist motivated act, manipulating the text and violating the SOURCE, removing the Serb federation (Republika Srpska) of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and disrespecting the source and vision of the person of Djokovic, who recognizes only Kosovo and Metohia (per UN 1244), not kosovo, violating Source and BLP policies here; He vandalized a stable text, with nationalist-motivated act, by manipulating text. here; here; here; here; He vandalized a stable text, with racial motivation, manipulating and hiding a fact. here; He vandalized a stable text, with nationalist-motivated, inserting the name of a disputed state into images without need in an orthodox church here; He vandalized a stable text, with racist-motivated act, inserting a Copy / Paste of Islam in Kosovo, removing an image of a Serb Orthodox church( wich is in Eastern Orthodoxy in Europe), and removing a name of Serbian orthodox monastery that is in UNESCO, Disrespecting the UN Source here; He vandalized a stable text, with nationalist motivation, undermining the article and disrespecting the source, because the Catholic Church does not recognize Kosovo here; He vandalized an church article stable text, with a racist-motivated act, manipulating the text, racistly calling serbs as "colonizers" (same level of the nazis calling poles as colonizers - nazi propaganda), and hiding the name of nazist albania, in a serb church article, disrespecting the source, this is clearly unnaceptable neo nazi pov. here; He vandalized a stable article, with nationalist motivation, inserting an unsourced claim that says Kosovo uses a Serbian internet protocol (.rs), but does not use, only .net (or possibly .xk) here. Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 17:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About the "analbanian text" i literally responded this in old talk archive: About the "analbanian" summary, I really apologize because I didn't want to do this, I edit using the tablet, and when I put "an albanian vandalism" the orthography corrector itself corrected it to "analbanian vandalism" I don't know how and why. sorry. I disabilited the corrector Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Aquinasthomes1: You are blocked for two weeks for edit warring, but you are also blocked indefinitely for calling other user neonazi racist without proper evidence. The evidence you provided above is useless. There is zero proof that the editor is either neonazi or racist. So, you have to address that issue in your unblock request in order to be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Vanjagenije:But I showed clearly and visible evidence in reply resume with Diffs to El_C. Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aquinasthomes1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will stop edit warring, because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock. I understand now how that is wrong and how violate the wiki rules, I will allow InNeed95 edit warring and put his bias (per his history), because for now I dont care. I for sure will stop making accusations, because it is wrong and that violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 33 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is injust. Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 17:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

Making a personal attack when you were blocked for, in part, making a personal attack is a gutsy move. Unfortunately, it didn't work out here. Yamla (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aquinasthomes1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, I will stop edit warring because i dont want (and I don't like it because it's causes me anguish and agony) edit warring, I was just edit warring that because he (InNeed95) literally do edit warring and violate the rules immediately after his unblock (he was blocked too for edit warring), I understand now how that is violate the wiki rules. I will stop making accusations, because, again, violates wiki rules. I clearly want to contribute to wikipedia. I made 34 useful pages (1 that go to DYK), and I want to make more pages as I propose. The indefinite block is indeed injust. Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 21:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

You're a sock of User:JohnGotten. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Aquinasthomes1,

Thank you for creating Prousos Monastery.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We require independent reliable sources for this article to meet notabililty. Kindly do the needful and add references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Whiteguru)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:48, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Whiteguru:, thank you to notify, i want to improve the article that I created, but unfortunately i am blocked so i cant, I send a request to unblock and i am waiting to be unblocked. When i was unblocked, I'll improve the article. Aquinasthomes1 (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Aquinasthomes1: Yes, I saw your block. I suggest you agree to a topic ban on Serbia and Serbian articles for 6 months (or something like that) and that you will abide the 3RRR policy on editing and reverting. Do not complain, do not say it is unfair, simply say you will agree to a topic ban and you will follow policy. This may help you.
• The monastery article is quite good, but you need to give references to independent, reliable sources about the monastery. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Prousos Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Simeon Stylites Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Lelic Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prousos Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simeon Stylites Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Prousos Monastery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simeon Stylites Monastery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gospel of St. Nicholas of Rošci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lelić Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquinasthomes1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lelić Monastery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]