Hello Aquintero82! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Artaxiad 00:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for updating Germany–Mexico relations. Your work is indispensable! ComputerJA (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! You said Mexico nationals no longer have the condition of having to travel with Turkish airlines to obtain evisa and I what I meant is that the article already points that out as below the list of countries there are additional notes. You probably skipped them, but here is the one I am referring to "all except citizens of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Iraq, Mexico, Moldova, Pakistan and Taiwan must hold a round-trip ticket to Istanbul Ataturk Airport with Turkish Airlines." so that is already covered by this article. Regards, --Twofortnights (talk) 09:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To be honest I find it odd as well. And when I compiled the list I wanted to add Mexico to the e-Visa not the conditional e-Visa list but in the end decided to go with what the sources were giving. I couldn't find any link to use as a reference for placing Mexico under the regular e-Visa. I have fixed the Bhutan and Brunei errors on the map. As for Rwanda it is a bit confusing, I think it's more of a "visa on arrival application online" thing, but yes it applies to everyone. As for Syria they have cancelled their visa-free regime entirely a few days ago, meaning everyone has to get the visa in advance from Syrian diplomatic missions. They still haven't notified IATA.--Twofortnights (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please avoid using ibid in citations. See WP:IBID. You should use Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations. LibStar (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations on how to properly cite repeated citations. Thanks. LibStar (talk) 10:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

please read the above, you are still not correctly citating repeated citations as in the Mexico Switzerland article. There are also a number of articles you've created where you've used ibid. This also needs to be fixed up. I'd appreciate your action on this. LibStar (talk) 07:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for making those changes. LibStar (talk) 08:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foreign relations of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I saw that you have deleted the content that are about Chinese missions in these three countries. Actually, China has three commercial offices in these countries. Here are evidences: http://do.chinacommercialoffice.org/esp/ http://ht.chinacommercialoffice.org/fra/ http://pa.chinacommercialoffice.org/esp/

And I could not find the reasons that you delete the content, please resume the content. Thank you. --Billytanghh (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moreover, these three countries also have commercial offices in China. --Billytanghh (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. You have new messages at Talk:List of diplomatic missions in Moldova.
Message added 12:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

See comment there regarding your reversion. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I was wondering, should we add to the listing the commercial offices that Mexico has overseas? ProMexico (http://www.promexico.gob.mx/) has several of this Trade Offices, fully specializing in Mexican trade, import/export and investment, in certain location where no Mexican consulates are located, such a Casablanca (Morocco), or Sydney (Australia).

In the article related to Brazilian missions (List of diplomatic mission of Brazil), a trade office is mentioned in Dubai. Apart from that, Brazil does not have a Consulate or any other representation in Dubai, UAE, but in Abu Dhabi. Thus, my question: should we include in the list the Mexican official trade missions sponsored by government run ProMéxico, in cities where they are the only official Mexican post, or not?

Harris75 (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Harris75Reply[reply]

Thanks for your prompt answer! Yes, I agree with fully incorporating into the text those Mexican trade offices since in reality they belong to a wider understanding of the Mexican presence worldwide.

Have a great day Harris75 (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Harris75Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. You have new messages at Weegeerunner's talk page.
Message added 22:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Weegeerunner (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. You have new messages at Weegeerunner's talk page.
Message added 22:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Weegeerunner (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. You have new messages at Weegeerunner's talk page.
Message added 22:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.Reply[reply]

Weegeerunner (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of diplomatic missions in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, would you like to explain this edit[1] and in particular why there was no edit summary despite the irrefutable WP:good faith. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Aquintero82.

Although the link you provided showing information about the embassy says it exists, that is not true, the link is outdated. I live in Bogota and I've been on that address a couple of times (the last time was 4 months ago) and the building is completely abandoned. Therefore I'll proceed to revert your edition. Felviper (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

here. I got confused I guess. Thanks for catching. --RacerX¹¹ Talk to me^{Stalk me} 14:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Please don't put flag icons and links on section headings. See the manual of style regarding this. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Aquintero82, just noticed you reverted my edit to List of diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom. The consulates I added are full consulates according to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office are full consulates and not honorary ones so therefore should be included in the page. [2] C. 22468 Talk to me 19:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of state visits to Iran#improve. Thanks. Shahin (talk) 09:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Dutch MFA does not list it on their site. If you click on the link for Burundi it redirects to the Royal Dutch Embassy in Kigali [3] - ILBobby (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ireland–New Zealand relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish famine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Aquintero82, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the edit save. That's what I get for having too many windows open at once! - ILBobby (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canada–Chile relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Adam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Equatorial Guinea–Spain relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your edit for the Malaysia diplomatic page.Can you please do a favor that help to make table for those embassy.I already do some but not enough time to make all in once.Hope you can help it.😄 angys (Talk Talk) 14:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Don't erase modifications if you don't have sources 😑 Islam Airoudj (talk) 15:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you give me a link to the standard policy of how foreign relation articles are presented. Thanks! Volunteer1234 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Austria–Mexico relations refers to the diplomatic relations between Austria and Mexico." What's the point of being redundant with that sentence? I say their official names makes it better and more understandable in the sense that offical governments are interacting. -- sion8 ^{talk page} 18:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afghanistan–Greece relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xerxes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The proposed method you referred to in List of diplomatic missions in Vietnam is horrible and eyesore. If you think photos everywhere in crazy order and extremely long text in the current version of List of diplomatic missions of Australia is less sloppy than what I did then there is nothing more to discuss and I probably should not wasting time in this article anymore. Hoangkid (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you revert my edit (revision 841250196) to List of diplomatic missions of the United States. The Consulate General mission still excites as a separate mission from the mission to Israel.

• The Embassy is located on David Flusser street[4](in what was the consular section of the Consulate General in Jerusalem).
• The Consulate General is located on Argon street[5]

Bens (talk)

Hello, it's not unusual for a consulate-general to be separate from an embassy. It does not mean that Jerusalem should be listed as if it were a separate country. You will not receive support from the other editors for this change. Cheers, Aquintero82, 14 May 2018, 13:32 (UTC)

So list it as a separate mission in Israel, the are currently 2 separate missions in Jerusalem which should be noted. It is strange to have 2 separate missions in the same city. I listed it under Jerusalem and not under Israel as that is how the us government list it Bens (talk) 03:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the article List_of_diplomatic_missions_in_Israel you removed the Consulate General of the United States, Jerusalem form the Jerusalem section. This should still be listed in tgis section as this section lists The missions in Jerusalem not accredited to israel. The Consulate General of the United States, Jerusalem is accredited to Jerusalem and not to Israel [6]. The US Embassy in Jerusalem is however accredited to Israel, so should is correct that it is in the embassy section [7]

Unfortunately i think you are contributing to the current mess in Wikipedia showing the current state of the us missions in Israel and Jerusalem. There are currenly 2 missions in Isreal/Jerusalem.

1. The Embassy mission to Jerusalem (with offices in Tel Aviv) witch is accredited to Israel.
2. The Consulate General mission to Jerusalem witch is accredited to Jerusalem.

Before you change things please check you know what you are taking about. Bens (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

US foreign policy is disorientating and therefore I am not contributing to the "mess" as you state. As the United States has officialy recognized Jerusalem to be the capital of Israel (ergo part of Israel), therefore there are three missions within Israel: 1) Embassy in Jerusalem, 2) Embassy Branch Office in Tel Aviv & 3) Consulate-General and Mission (on the same premise) also in Jerusalem. Aquintero82, (talk), 11:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thak u for fixing the list. Note: The office in tlv is part of the same mission as the embossy in Jerusalem so there are only 2 missons in Israel. Also even thought the consulate general is in Jerusalem which is recognised as being in israel, the mission is not officially accredited to israel. Bens (talk) 11:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic–Venezuela relations into Foreign relations of Venezuela. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Cuba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Foreign relations of France without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Egypt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. What's the thinking behind this revert? It puts all of the embassy photos in the "Africa" section, when none of them are in Africa - they're all either in Europe or the USA. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Try viewing the page on mobile: it shows no embassy photos until you click "Africa", at which point you have to scroll through ten photos that aren't in Africa before being able to read the section (and if you click straight through to Europe or US, you don't get to see any photos at all).

MOS:IM says that "Each image should be inside the level 2 section to which it relates [or] at the top of the lead section", which makes for a coherent article structure. If vertical placement is an issue, place the images at the top of the article instead of in the first section. Or add a horizontal WP:GALLERY tag within the Europe section, or a gallery by itself at the bottom of the article. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Making such tables is a standard practice for every developed article. See France–Germany relations, Belgium–Netherlands relations, United Kingdom–United States relations and so on. I see no logic in your edits. --Andrei (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Aquintero82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of diplomatic missions of the Federated States of Micronesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is not necessary to "pipe" links as you did here per WP:NOPIPE. ("It is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects.") Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  04:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings, Aquintero82! Please, forgive me what I did on the diplomatic list in Belgium at Wikipedia, but I just want to explain to you that Sweden and Belgium aren't fighting together at all, but I really want to appreciate that Sweden would have its interests section in the Latvian embassy, if I would be right. Please, help me! ;) --62.63.238.25 (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, looking at their website, Sweden does not state that it has any sort of interest section in the Latvian embassy in Brussels, rather an ambassador based in Stockholm.[8]. What source are you referring to? Cheers. Aquintero82, (talk), 14:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Tanzania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Myanmar Government already announced opening of new mission in Cuba and Czech Republic. Please find English Version of Myanmar News paper to read. Government Minister has already informed the Myanmar Parliament about these opening.

Thanks

Hi. here List of diplomatic missions of San Marino, the list & map don't match re. mongolia. — kwami (talk) 22:48, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thank you, I've removed Mongolia as San Marino no longer has an embassy there. Aquintero82 (talk), 20:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belgium–United States relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Mozambique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there! I understand why you edited back the diplomatic lists in Sweden, but I can surely tell you that THIS page can explain to you about the diplomatic missions in Sweden: https://www.government.se/government-of-sweden/ministry-for-foreign-affairs/diplomatic-portal/the-stockholm-diplomatic-list/ . Thank you! --62.63.238.25 (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Providing evidence for my addition of the British Embassy Office in Niamey, Niger https://www.linkedin.com/in/hadjara-moussa-gros-6873a7a4 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/853678/FCO_Posts_Overseas_List_GOVUK18December.csv/preview https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/list-of-foreign-office-posts Each time I have added this very real diplomatic mission you remove it despite quoting the above as references. Please can you review and advise? - user @reximperator24

Hi! Why did you put Martinique into the Europe part of the list? I think, more is won if it is put into the Americas section because it is that close to St. Lucia. --Derim Hunt (talk) 08:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Aquintero82, first thing, please accept my apologies for reverting your edit without discussing it first, which were poor manners on my part. I raised the issue on the talk page on the article, so it may be best to reply to me there, but I feel the ICC should be mentioned in about a paragraph because it was the most significant interaction between Canada and Poland on the state level during the Cold War. There is a vast literature detailing how the Canadian, Indian, and Polish diplomats serving on the ICC in Vietnam worked together (and didn't work together)-of course you're right one should not violate the undue weight rule, but one paragraph does not violates the rule. Thank you for your time, patience and understanding. --A.S. Brown (talk) 05:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Aquintero82. An editor has complained about you at the noticeboard:

• WP:AN3#User:Aquintero82 reported by User:Desperado15 (Result: )

You can respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note that some of the embassies in Saint Lucia are located in Gros Islet instead of Castries. They are different administrative divisions.--219.79.89.235 (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estonia–United States relations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charleston, Lincoln and Scottsdale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have responded on the relevant talk page which can be seen here. FOARP (talk) 10:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Isn't it better to keep the photos/images country wise?Why do you keep the photo's together?Is there any particular reason? Miad I Mahbub BD (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you use a laptop/desktop, it doesn't work and places all of the photos in a disarray. Also, using a mobile phone doesn't help either. It's about coherence and organization of the articles for the users. User:Aquintero82, (talk); 26 October 2020, 21:05 (UTC)

According to 재외공관 설치법 (English),

• Article 2 : Embassy (Korean: 대사관), Representative Office (Korean: 대표부), Consulate-General (Korean: 총영사관)
• Article 3 : Consulate or Branch Office (Korean: 분관), Consular Office or Sub-Branche (Korean: 출장소)
• Article 7 : Honorary Consul General (Korean: 명예총영사)

Therefore, the 분관, 출장소 is not Honorary. --Direct700 (talk) 01:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contribution.

South Korea has missions in Jamaica and Tajikistan. but mission in Kingston is a branch, not an embassy. The ambassador to mexico is concurrently serving as ambassador to jamaica. If you don't understand, read this article. article by YNA ("South Korean Ambassador to Mexico Kim Sang-il visited Jamaica during Jamaica's diplomatic week from the 12th (local time) to the 15th (local time) to present his credentials to Governor Patrick Linton Allen and to meet with Foreign Minister Kami Johnson Smith.").

According to the law, it's called "주 자메이카 대한민국 대사관 킹스턴 분관 (Embassy of the Republic of Korea in Jamaica, Kingston Branch)". Georgia and Tajikistan are the same cases. 주 조지아 대한민국 대사관 트빌리시 분관, 주 타지키스탄공화국 대한민국 대사관 두샨베 분관. Therefore, the representative of the diplomatic mission is not an ambassador, but an Chargé d’Affaires. This is a case where a resident mission is needed, but no embassy is needed.

also 분관, 출장소 is not Honorary. ex) Consular Office of the Republic of Korea in Anchorage (주 앵커리지 대한민국 출장소) is not Honorary. Please check the homepage. As you can see in the greeting of the homepage, Diplomats are dispatched to work. Viewing Korean Wikipedia through a translator can also help you understand. If there is no disagreement about this, can I turn it back? --Direct700 (talk) 05:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, although ambassadors may be placed in other locations, the resident mission is usually considered to be an "Embassy Branch Office". That is relevant than calling it a consulate as that is usually not the case, especially in this situation. Regards, Aquintero82, (talk), 11:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The mission is the same "분관", but it has been translated into "Consulate." There may be translation problems. So, do you agree to revise such parts to "Embassy Branch Office" and reverse the rest? Tbilisi of Georgia is the same case, but in your edits it says "Consular Office," not the embassy. Malabo of Equatorial Guinea was also rolled back, though the same case was the case. And do you admit that the rest of the "분관, 출장소" like Anchorage is a resident mission, not an honorary? --Direct700 (talk) 00:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I've reverted my edits and added "Embassy Branch Office" to Jamaica, Tajikistan, Equatorial Guinea and Georgia. Cheers. Aquintero82, (talk), 17:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your kind contribution. :) --Direct700 (talk) 01:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian,

Can you provide me where the consensus was made? --Best regards, Randam (talk) 18:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need a permanent solution. I looked up the history and have seen that this is a recurring issue. Thus it means, a significant amount of people have a different view. And unless you want to revert the next 1000 years the edits of future editors, a better consensus must be reached.

It's not consistent to have Cyprus and Russia as Europe (look at where Vladivostok is located), while Turkey not. Turkey is part of more than 1000 European organizations. From aviation to sports, from education to politics, from judiciary to music, history et cetera. This fact must be reflected in Wikipedia. However, I don't like being persistent. To meet you halfway, I suggest that "contiguous transcontinental countries" like Russia and Turkey are added both in Asia and Europe. I don't see why that would be a problem. --Randam (talk) 19:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Aquintero82. Do you have any links to the prior discussions that put Turkey in Asia? It would help if that could be added to your 3RR report. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Aquintero82. You've been warned per the result of a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You are risking a block if you make any further reverts about whether Turkey is in Europe or Asia unless you get a prior consensus on a talk page. Feel free to search for past discussions. Let me know if you need assistance. As you know, our Europe and Asia articles currently show Turkey as being in Asia. See also Boundaries between the continents of Earth#Europe and Asia. EdJohnston (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Manual of Style explicitly discourages formulations such as this. If this kind of language is widely used in articles, that's because they are not in compliance with the MOS. This should be corrected. --Un assiolo (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, my name is JoãotheWikiFan, and i just want to tell you why you reverted my edit on List of diplomatic missions in Brazil? My Regards.

Hello, there is a difference between career consulates (i.e. a representative of that country is based in the city where the diplomatic mission is located) and an honorary consulate (i.e. a citizen of the host country assists the foreign country, however, is not a diplomat and has no diplomatic powers). The Philippine consulate in Manaus is an honorary consulate. Cheers. User: Aquintero82, (talk), 06 May 2021, 16:04 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of diplomatic missions in Morocco

added a link pointing to Dakhla

List of diplomatic missions of Haiti

added a link pointing to Dakhla

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for improving articles related to diplomacy. Very few people are active in this field and your work is amazing! AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You might want to refer to this page: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zwjg_674741/zwzlg_674757/yz_674759/ . Some consulate-generals and consulates are temporarily closed (eg. Aden's, Izmir's, Osh's). And not all are consulate-generals. Some are consulates (eg. Laoag's) or consular office (i.e. Phuket's). Also, the consular office in Sihanoukville, Cambodia was opened on June 8, 2021. I would say that Chinese version of Wikipedia is updated and more accurate to reflect the changes. Cybercicada (talk) 03:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have another photo on my PC where the sign literally says Consulate General. Provide a source that supports your claim or undo your edit.--Catlemur (talk) 09:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, the link you provided shows a non-government email address and the consul listed has a Greek name. Honorary consulates are run by host country locals, and not by official diplomatic staff. Here is also a link from the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs which does not mention any official diplomatic presence from Ivory Coast in Greece. Regards, Aquintero82, (talk), 08:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greece–Tajikistan relations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greece–Tajikistan relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Aquintero82! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Canada–Philippines relations, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from , and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Canada–Philippines relations and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Canada–Philippines relations, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Canada–Philippines relations. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Canada–Philippines relations with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Canada–Philippines relations saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mottezen (talk) 00:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have undone your edit. The offices I listed are already listed in the Russia article. Either remove both or keep both; removing it from the Belarus page while keeping it on the Russia page is hypocritical. As for the claim of "unsourced", if you pick an office and run it through Google, you get plenty of evidence for its existence. 156.3.95.1 (talk) 20:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mexico%E2%80%93Samoa_relations A troublemaker is trying to delete the article you created. That is bad. Charliestalnaker (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Thank you for removing some of the www.natvisa.com spam (making a point of saying this as I know that such work is tedious and time-consuming but often goes unthanked). Unfortunately there's still a lot more of it (just in case you still have any appetite for more). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This has been completed. Aquintero82 22:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Aquintero can you get back Libya in List of diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom Map because the British embassy reopen in Tripoli 41.253.33.134 (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi can you Edit the map of the diplomatic missions according to the current missions Lamise2006 (talk) 07:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I've noticed that, over the years, you have been creating pages with leads like this:

"France–Togo relations refers to the diplomatic relations between the French Republic and the Togolese Republic."

I don't know if you're using some kind of template to create the pages. Why this absurd wording? It doesn't make sense either grammatically or semantically. Relations don't refers to relations. Relations are relations.

If you're going to create any more of these pages, please take note. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[9] is the reason why so many people are leaving Wikipedia. You are too stubborn and demanding for a new photo, instead of trying to see the bigger picture. Thanks for nothing. Dqfn13 (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi - made some updates about diplomatic mission in Fiji, based on my on-the-ground knowledge. Also tried to tidy the page up a bit and make things a little more consistent. Trying to be helpful 🙂. Any particular concerns with the updates I made? Cheers. 45.117.247.225 (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've reverted and tidied the page so that it is now up-to-date. In particular, the 23 current resident embassies/high commissions in Suva are now accurate. The only thing that needs to be corrected on this page, as far as I'm aware, is the map at the top (i.e. correcting with the current 23 states listed as being resident in Suva) - I can't figure out which website to use to create an updated map (there are many available but I can't find the one that looks exactly the same), is that something you'd be able to do, or you could point me in the right direction? Thanks. 210.7.29.7 (talk) 09:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine–United States relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, where have you read that the Kazakhstan government will be opening an embassy in Ireland? I can't find anything online. My wife is a national of Kazakhstan. JosephAlmaty (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of diplomatic missions of Palau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I see you're quite active in the international relations space on here, so I wanted to ask you a question. I see there have been proposals over the years to create a specific notability guideline for bilateral relations articles (i.e. Spain–United Kingdom relations). However, there has never been one closed with consensus. So what's your take on GNG as it applies to bilateral relations? I'm asking because I'm thinking about creating South Korea–Trinidad and Tobago relations, but if it's going to get taken to AfD for being non-notable, I'd like to save myself the trouble. Thanks! Patr2016 (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, by notability, editors are looking for information on how two country's diplomatic/bilateral relations are notable. Do they have resident embassies? Historical connections? Have Presidents/Prime Ministers of each nation visited each other? Is there notable trade or bilateral activities occurring? Is there is a significant diaspora community?

There isn't a notability guideline, it depends on the perception of senior editors/reviewers. The Japan–Trinidad and Tobago relations is a good example of an article layout. Make sure that the information you place is verifiable and that there is a strong connection between both nations. Aquintero82 (talk) 06:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the response! Appreciate you taking the time to clarify for me. Patr2016 (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I’ve noticed that you reverted the changes of the section “List of diplomatic missions in Sweden”, and what I would like to show you is the evidence about the changes of it. Please, see: https://www.government.se/globalassets/government/dokument/utrikesdepartementet/diplomatportalen/diplomatlistan/stockholm-diplomatic-list-12-may-2023.pdf . Much obliged! 95.202.77.93 (talk) 05:44, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please ensure to cite your source when making edits. I've reverted my changes. Aquintero82, 20 May 2023, 15:18 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of diplomatic missions in the Dominican Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Plata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thanks for always updating this page. I noticed Iran is listed as having an interests section for Canada. That is not the case. Canada and Iran do not have any diplomatic relations, and no other country provides protecting power for Canada in Iran. Italy used to do it for Canada, but not anymore. However, we do have an interests section in North Korea. Sweden provides protecting power for Canada in that country. If you could please update the map, that would be appreciated. Thenoflyzone (talk) 10:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, @Aquintero82 Can you please explain why you reverted this edit? Thanks. يوسف قناوة (talk) 01:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't use as a source a link from 2011 that has been archived. Aquintero82 (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Very well. But you can also do a great favour if you use WP:ES when you revert such cases. Regards. يوسف قناوة (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is your problem? It is not difficult to add "honorary consulate". Did you read the source? Sakiv (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Aquintero82, I see that you have now twice [10][11] reverted my edit to Peru–Spain relations. My edit removed the redundant first sentence: "Peru–Spain relations are foreign relations between Peru and Spain."

Please see MOS:REDUNDANCY, which uses exactly this kind of sentence as an example of what to avoid:

Keep redundancy to a minimum in the first sentence. Use the first sentence of the article to provide relevant information that is not already given by the title of the article. The title need not appear verbatim in the lead if it is descriptive. For example:

Iraq–Pakistan relations are the relations between Iraq and Pakistan.

Iraq and Pakistan established diplomatic relations in 1947.

The title "Peru–Spain relations" is a descriptive title, and there is no need to include it directly in the first sentence (nor to make it bold). Please also read MOS:BOLDAVOID and WP:SBE. —Bkell (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]