This user has recently changed their username from Legendiii to ArcMachaon. Apologies for any confusion.

Hi, I seem to have noticed a small glitch with the British LGBT sidebar you recently created. It seems WP Commons files are pushed directly below it. For instance, on the Isle of Man and Guernsey articles, the European recognition map is placed directly underneath the template, whereas it was initially located higher up in the article, same for the Pitcairn Islands article but with a different map, etc.. Do you know how to fix this? It's not much of a deal, but I do feel as if it clusters the page a bit, especially the Isle of Man one. Jedi Friend (talk) 18:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jedi Friend: Thanks for letting me know - I've had a quick look into the issue and it seems to be a problem with a lot of (all?) ((Sidebar with collapsible lists))-based templates, meaning that this issue will affect a lot more than the ((LGBT rights in the United Kingdom sidebar)). I'll have a more in-depth look as soon as a I can but you may have stumbled across something much bigger than you thought! Thanks Legendiii (talk) 23:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Legendiii

Thank you for creating Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019.

User:StraussInTheHouse, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, I've reviewed this page. The neutrality and empty section tags were already there. As far as I can see, the empty section is the only issue, whoever placed the neutrality tag did not elucidate on the talk page, so for its removal please look for it in the edit history and discuss it with them below. Other than that, this looks ready.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|StraussInTheHouse)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SITH (talk) 15:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think you should add this infobox to articles where the information in the article is easily found, especially in small articles. Take this case, for example. Exactly why is this infobox needed there? It doesn't tell readers anything that isn't already easily/quickly found in the article. Infoboxes can unnecessarily clutter articles, as it does in this case, especially since that article already had two infoboxes.

I'm also not sue why you created Template:Infobox gender and sexual identity.

If you reply to me on any of this, please reply here on your talk page and don't ping me. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I do appreciate infoboxes for some topics, like nations or biological species, but gender and sexual identities are not a good fit for the concept. These topics are complex and volatile, and many of the entries on the infobox will be a controversy magnet wherever it is implemented. Crossroads ^-talk- 03:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Crossroads: Hi both, thanks for reaching out. I created this infobox after I saw the use of ((Infobox ethnic group)) used on the Hijra (South Asia) article and thought a better infobox could be made which encompassed key points of the article. When I began creation, I saw an opportunity to provide greater flexibility in the template to allow for not only "third gender"/non-Western gender-non-conforming physical communities but also a broader range of gender and sexual identities. It doesn't mean that it has to be used in all articles that fall into this category. Yes, infoboxes do not to provide additional information - their purpose is to act as an article summary. It is clear that many articles, especially non-Western "third gender" articles could do with infoboxes providing demographic data, definitions and more - and this can be extended to some Western identities. I also acknowledge your concerns around controversy and agree a balance needs to be struck - for most articles at risk of vandalism or controversy, controversy is likely to be generated regardless - but in others it may indeed be better to avoid an infobox. For example, if I were to want to put an infobox on one of the 'Big 4' sexual orientations I'd be 100% against not writing about it on the talk page first. For more niche articles on Western concepts where people are just looking for a definition and some demographics or flag information this infobox could be useful. Generally speaking, however, I expect it will be useful in articles on non-Western concepts with a Western audience in mind. Hope this helps ArcMachaon (talk) 13:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi ArcMachaon, could you please make the gay genes template table collapsed by default? It takes up too much room in articles, and I may make a new "gay gene/s" wikipedia article that includes it, rather than having it in the other sexual orientation articles. This is purely because gay gene studies have not found any candidate gay genes. I highlight the problems here. Let me know if you can make that change. Sxologist (talk) 03:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sxologist: I understand the problem you're highlighting and I can implement the changes you suggest now. Thanks for dropping me a message! ArcMachaon (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In Talk:Variant_of_Concern_202012/01#RfC_on_UK_Coronavirus_usage you voted for Option A, but now the option is split into A1/A2/A3 for voters to specify whether they support (A1) put in article's lead, (A2) in Nomenclature's opening sentence or (A3) brush it off at the end of Nomenclature. Also, after your initial vote there is considerable discussion below. You might want to have a look as you amend you vote. Thank you ! -- love.wh 13:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you, I have now done so. ArcMachaon (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2015–present Polish constitutional crisis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article 2015–present Polish constitutional crisis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2015–present Polish constitutional crisis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 16:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I know you have an interest in the ongoing 2022 monkeypox outbreak, so I wanted to invite you to the new monkeypox outbreak task force, which I started from the WikiProject of current events. The task force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating to the new outbreak. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 06:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey ArcMachaon, you did the work to update the map for the current outbreak, if I saw it correctly? I've suggested on the articles talk page to go for an outbreak specific map, and that so far got no "nays", so I thought I'd say hello + ask if you'd like to help with that, or if there's anything important to take into account when doing it.

I was thinking of using the color scheme as here ( - blue for suspected case, red for confirmed, darker red for cumulatively more cases. ).

What do you think? Not sure if I'm still going to give it a shot tonight, but if I do I'll definitely post you what I've come up with :P.

Regards, Sean Heron (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sean Heron: thanks for reaching out. I was just mulling over creating a new map for exactly this purpose - albeit with some shading for variation in case numbers. It would certainly make sense, especially if you were thinking of adding a map to the infobox. Definitely give it a shot yourself as I'm busy over the next couple of weeks so won't get round to it for some time.

The key I was considering was very similar: various shades of red for confirmed cases (light red = 1 confirmed case; darkening as the number increases), and then a shade of light blue for suspected cases only (of course, feel free to use, ignore or iterate upon this).

Once it is created, the current map (with endemic clades) could remain on the main monkeypox pages and perhaps the background section of the outbreak page, with the new map taking 'centre stage' in the infobox of outbreak page. Please feel free to ping me again with whatever you decide to do! I've also uploaded a map with just the countries where it is endemic which might also be useful down the line. Thanks, ArcMachaon (talk) 23:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Infobox gender and sexual identity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 12:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]