Thanks for creating the article for Antaeusuchus! Hiroizmeh (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I must assume there has been a mistake given the confusing state of the review page following your edits and the fact that I merely asked for feedback for an image that may come into use in the future. I would very much appreciate having these vandalism warnings? removed accordingly Armin Reindl (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Armin Reindl: Greetings! Thank you for expanding Stupendemys! Someone with just one edit on the article nominated it for GAN. If you want to get the article to GA (which is very easy at this point), just ping me and I'll start a review for you (just copy and paste this:((subst:GAN|subtopic=Biology and medicine)) and replace it with the current GA template on the talk page). Wretchskull (talk) 18:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stupendemys you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stupendemys you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stupendemys for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The paper of Sebecus ayrampu last year is quite suspicious for me for the following reasons:

1: The study retains the original classification of Sebecus:

"Therefore, we consider for the moment this is an unnecessary nomenclatorial change and we regard Zulmasuchus querejazus and Langstonia huilensis as junior synonyms of S.huilensis and S.querejazus"

The new generic combination of S.huilensis and S.querejazus were made in the 21st century, but there is still some taxonomists still regard the original classification, similar to how some taxonomists still regard Tarbosaurus as Tyrannosaurus bataar. In my point of view, it's not a major consensus so we must ignore that.

2: Too much difference from S. icaeorhinus

Due to i found that S. ayrampu has too many contrasts with S. icaeorhinus, it needs a new genus name in the future.

1) I had very little input on the Sebecus page as it is in its current state. My sole contribution to Sebecus is the addition of the new species so I am not sure why you specifically come to me to voice your thoughts on the matter.

2) Generally just due weight and original research need to be brought up here. Even if you deem S. ayrampu to be too different, it's not our call to make. That's original research not supported by publications and thus, no offense, not allowed on wikipedia. And as far as Zulmasuchus and Langstonia are concerned, a single paper making an off-hand mention does not overturn prior research automatically. It takes a more in-depht publication and even then it's most likely not enough to immediately chance concensus. Nor would the authors opinion on Sebecus taxonomy render the rest of the paper invalid.

3) I see you've been on here for a while so please sign your comments with four "~" at the end of your paragraph

4) Like FunkMonk has told you multiple times it seems, please don't go to individual editors for this. Like I said in my first point, I merely made a single edit so I am not sure why you've come here Armin Reindl (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any of the inconvenience caused at your sandbox. I will not edit your sandbox again. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armin Reindl. Thank you for your work on Phoenicopterus stocki. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armin Reindl. Thank you for your work on Congopycnodus. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to Jebel Qatrani Formation what does this mean, "estimated boy size"? Neils51 (talk) 03:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

a typo, nothing more, its fixed Armin Reindl (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trochlea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armin Reindl. Thank you for your work on Perucetus. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:18, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to thank you for all the great work you've done adding content to fossil crocodilians! So many articles have been greatly expanded. It's fun to see your additions pop up on my watch list. I just wanted to give you some recognition and appreciation. Good work, keep it up! Cougroyalty (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Crocodilians and Pseudosuchians in general are a topic I'm very passionate about and I'm glad the work is paying off. As you probably noticed I'm currently working through mekosuchines, which I'll probably be able to finish soon enough (only two major pages are missing an overhaul). After that I'll take a brief "break" by tackling basilosaurids along a friend, but I'll return to the group for any new taxa and eventually take on another larger clade. Armin Reindl (talk) 11:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Varanosuchus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lacrimal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Armin Reindl. Thank you for your work on Peltocephalus maturin. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very well-written and comprehensive article, happy to see articles like this in the new pages queue! Easily C-class at least, if there are more sources and images that can be added, it could be well on the way to becoming a GA. (Also, the article is suitable for WP:DYK if you can get an interesting hook about it!)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Chaotic Enby)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 20:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do actually plan on making a size comparisson (unless I get distracted by my other ongoing projects) and some rudimentary scaling definitely highlights how ridiculously big that thing is. I did consider doing more DYKs in the past given the types of edits I tend to make, but thanks for the kind words. Armin Reindl (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]