Welcome to Wikipedia, TheEditMate! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use ((Ping|HiLo48)) such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((help me)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your message @HiLo48:. It's really nice receive this kind of warm welcome. Also, the cookies are great, I definitely need to ask for the recipe. :) TheEditMate (talk) 09:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have reverted you edit op Świt (song). With as summary: restored technical trick to fool a maintenance bot. This keeps the page out of maintenance lists. The Banner talk 20:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello and welcome Artemis Andromeda! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the message mate :) TheEditMate (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Polish-Lithuanian military units of Kościuszko Uprising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This should not be done, see MOS:OPENPARABIO. SK2242 (talk) 13:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Zoob is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Zoob until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow (✉) 14:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Abelard Giza, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 02:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Monument to Polish Endeavor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Professionally inactive, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Bix Aliu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Jakub Dębski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. The main source used here, Lubimyczytać.pl., is a Polish version of Goodreads (not reliable). The ISBN list looks impressive but those are just short comics with little impact. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ezlev.^talk 20:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, TheEditMate! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ezlev.talk 20:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Monument in Memory of Chinese from Tiananmen, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franek Dolas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franek Dolas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please don't add nonexistent categories to articles, as you did to Biokovsko Selo and many others today. Either create the category first, or don't add it. Thanks. PamD 17:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work. You could help us when you translate a page into English by not linking to common terms such as "village". Also, we don't normally link years or dates, and flag icons are usually not included in infoboxes (perhaps sports excluded from that). Tony (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Lists of roads named after fictional characters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Misiek1997 (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Flag of Szczecin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Knight class (Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Kravica (river). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Kravica), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 22:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PLease read and take note: the same applies to Colony (Poland) which you created today. Thanks. PamD 22:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republic of Mosina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pole. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Jan Wieszczycki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Józef Latoszyński, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for the edits on Vilamovians. Have you considered moving Wymysorys language to 'Vilamovian language'? It is the official rendering used by Google. Oliszydlowski (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I actually did, but I'm not really sure which one is the more recognized version of the name. An additional problem is that a lot of internet results seem to literally quote Wikipedia, saying "Wymysorys, also known as Vilamovian", which complicates determining the name. It seems like term "Wymysorys" is more popular, including, amoung sources already uses by the Wikipedia article itself. Yet the name "Vilamovian" still seems to be in use, being used for example by Google (https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/vilamovian-language/m038xbg?hl=en), though I don't know if this is an official decision made by the Google team or rather automated or community decision. Also, I see it being used by Wikiprojects in an inconsistent way, including Wikidictionary using the name "Vilamovian" (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:Vilamovian_language). TheEditMate (talk) 14:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phasael II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phasael II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 06:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Herod VI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite the numbers after his name, Herod VI was not a ruler. He was a minor member of the family of Herod the Great who never reigned. All the information we have about him is genealogical so he definitely isn’t notable. This belongs in a family tree and not in a stand alone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Podlachians, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Lithuanian raid on Mazovia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interesting article, and thanks for writing it, but please add more refs to Władysław the White's rebellion. There are entire paragraphs missing footnotes. Let's try to make the article resemble modern standards. TIA! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kazimierz Zakrzewski (military officer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Polish–Lithuanian Neutral Strip, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Polish–Lithuanian Neutral Strip, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like ((WikiProject Keyword)) to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories disestablished in 1376 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bix Aliu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bix Aliu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Republic of Mosina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		On behalf of WP:POLAND, I award you the Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class. Thank you for your efforts! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to TheEditMate by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 06:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Los Altos (state) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into State of Los Altos. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Central Lithuanian Offensive on Kaunas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Also, please see WP:CIT as to what is needed in references/footnotes in order to satisfy WP:VERIFY. Simply listing a book is not specific enough.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Tunis, Sohag Governorate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Gniewkowo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Battle of Gniewkowo instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

There are both a draft and an article on this subject. The article was created after a previous version of the article was moved into draft space for verifiability concerns. The current article has reliable sources and has been reviewed by a new page reviewer, so the verifiability concerns appear to have been addressed.

This draft will be redirected to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Gniewkowo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle of Gniewkowo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Flag of Provo, Utah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SounderBruce 00:52, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Abelard Giza instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abelard Giza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abelard Giza, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Duchy of Gniewkowo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the future, Artemis, if you disagree with a move to Draft space, please move the article back rather than doing a cut-and-paste recreation of the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Please discuss at talk page what notability in external news sources has increased for Jaiden since the February 2021 version.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaiden Animations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jaiden Animations, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Szczecin pumps, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like ((WikiProject Keyword)) to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories established in 966 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Artemis Andromeda,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kingdom of Poland (1025–1031) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello @John B123:. I want to disagree. I copied the text in question from the article Mieszko II Lambert. The said article was by itself translated (mostly without majoir changes) from Polish article. If anything, the page https://www.geni.com/people/Mieszko-II-Lambert-king-of-Poland/6000000000768959047 that was marked as "orignal" copied its text from Wikipedia. It even gives links to Wikipedia articles and have classical source markers such as "[1]" within its text, clearly showing that text was copy pasted from Wikipedia.

Example: "...he married with Richeza (Ryksa),[2] daughter ...". I hope, that this misunderstanding will be fixed soon. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Duchy of Poland (1079–1138). While you are welcome to re-use the content of Wikipedia, here or elsewhere, our licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please be aware that editors who repeatedly copy content without attribution risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artemis Andromeda — per John B123's message, it would be helpful if you could go back into the articles in which you've copied content and make a dummy edit with the summary copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution in order to comply with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Biała County, Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories disestablished in 1223 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories disestablished in 1300 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monument to Polish Endeavor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professionally inactive, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Artemis Andromeda.

@Artemis Andromeda: - Thank you for your contribution to the articles you have made on Poland, notably the Duchies and Kingdoms. However, I do see certain problems. Firstly, these are so-called WP:Stub articles which are quote "too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject". Such articles should be avoided, moreover the number of these create nothing more but confusion. One should not be copying information from other pages related to the subject and pasting them into brand new articles, which subsequently become duplicates. The increasing number of these articles hurts the credibility of Wikipedia as a whole. Deleting your articles would undermine the work you have done and, after all, these are sourced. I'd suggest merging these into a single 'Kingdom of Poland' and a single 'Duchy of Poland'. The difference between all the duchies and kingdoms is minimal really. All the information you included would be then placed under appropriate headings in the history section. Merangs (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see also discussion here. We may be best off trying to centralize the discussion at WT:POLAND. This topic (periodization and naming of articles) was also extensively discussed 10+ years ago (see for example Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Poland/Periodization), so we should not make changes such as splitting an article into pieces and turning it into a redirect without a discussion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, The Unprepared, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, N̨, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You write many cool articles. Why don't you want to promote them at WP:DYK? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your nice words :) . It's really nice to hear that you like them. About DYK. Honestly, I don't know how to explain it. I feel that I just felt that I didn't know how to properly promote them, nor, which part of them would be the interesting "did you know" part. I always was saying to myself that I will do it eventually but I never did. Unfortunately, as I read now, I see, that only new articles are eligible, so I guess I missed my chance :( Artemis Andromeda (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Indeed, last 7 days or so. It's good to start now. Sometimes simple is better. Such as "... that the 10th century Polish–Veletian War ended up with the destruction of Veletians and Polish conquest of Pomerania?" _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They weren't destroyed. Idk if I did mixed something up in article? Their army in the war got destoryed, and Mieszko conquered much of Western Pomerania. But the most eastern territories of Veneti still were under their controll and they still were active (they even had another wars with Poland and Germany later on). Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:960s in Europe indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Professionally inactive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monument of Railwayman, Szczecin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You deleted several relevant foreign placenames from the lead of Polish cities. Regarding historic German placenames there is a well established consensus as defined by the "Gdansk vote" ("For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names")

This page is affected by the Gdańsk (Danzig) Vote. The following rules apply in the case of disputes: For Gdańsk, use the name Danzig between 1308 and 1945 For Gdańsk, use the name Gdańsk before 1308 and after 1945 In biographies of clearly German persons, the name should be used in the form Danzig (Gdańsk) and later Danzig exclusively In biographies of clearly Polish persons, the name should be used in the form Gdańsk (Danzig) and later Gdańsk exclusively. For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names, e.g. Danzig (now Gdańsk, Poland) or Gdańsk (Danzig). An English language reference that primarily uses this name should be provided on the talk page if a dispute arises. Reverts to conform with community consensus are excluded from the three-revert rule (3RR). Only the place names can be reverted exempt from the 3RR according to the outcome of this vote, additional changes fall again under the 3RR. Please use descriptive edit summaries. Persistent reverts against community consensus despite multiple warnings may be dealt with according to the rules in Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism. In case of doubt, assume good faith and do not bite newcomers. The detailed vote results and the vote itself can be found on Talk:Gdansk/Vote. This vote has ended; please do not vote anymore. Comments and discussions can be added to Talk:Gdansk/Vote/discussion anytime. This template ((Gdansk-Vote-Notice)) can be added on the talk page of affected articles if necessary.

Even without the Gdansk vote relevant foreign names wouldn't be placed just in a footnote (WP:PLACENAME). Please do not continue these edits. HerkusMonte (talk) 06:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I didn't remove anything. In fact, if you would check, in many cases,I have expanded those lists. I put them in the notes with template:efn, simply because they were creating too long lists to display together. I'm fully supportive of putting foreign names with articles names. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 09:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I still don't see a reason to ignore WP:PLACENAME and the Gdansk vote. We do not hide these names in footnotes. It's rather contradictory to "expand those lists" and giving "too long lists" as a rationale to remove these lists you just created from the lead. Please respect the long established WP:consensus. HerkusMonte (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you haven't noticed, lists done with efn template are gaining popularity and are better, as they don't clutter the opening sentence of the article with tens of names, for example in Kosciuszko Uprising. Also, I'm not "hiding" anything, they are all easily accessible and visible in the notes. You just got to click on the [a].Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I haven't noticed a gaining popularity of the efn template for placenames. Currently WP:PLACENAME represents the established consensus of how to deal with relevant foreign placenames. You might take your proposal to the respective talk page, for now you should just stop deleting relevant foreign names from the lead section. HerkusMonte (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

3O

You continued to ignore WP:PLACENAME ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). I've asked for a WP:3O. HerkusMonte (talk) 09:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Response to third opinion request:

I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on User:Artemis Andromeda and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes.

HerkusMonte is correct that WP:PLACENAME, specifically item 2 in this section, is the controlling guideline here. Foreign language names used in at least 10% of the English sources should be listed in the lead, in parentheses, in alphabetical order. Artemis Andromeda, you are right to reject characterizing your work as 'deletion', but my opinion is that placement in a footnote is unarguably a reduction in prominence when compared to placement in the lead. If you feel that the benefits of reducing clutter outweigh the loss of prominence afforded to important information, the best next move is to build consensus for this change in guideline at WT:PLACENAME. Examples of articles that use efn for the foreign place name lists will be helpful, especially examples created by other editors. I have this user talk page on my watchlist for at least the next 90 days and will be happy to add clarifications or respond to questions. Please ping me if this discussion proceeds at a different page. Thank you for seeking out a third opinion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Firefangledfeathers (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Flag of Szczecin instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flag of Szczecin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Flag of Szczecin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miecław, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duchy of Poland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please refrain from adding any kind of Indic scripts per WP:NOINDICSCRIPTS, like you did here. — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 101 Dalmatian Street, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Okay, I can get a little angry because I hate vandals, but you were adding unsourced representation, which can also mean WP:TRIVIA. Using the episodes that actual references can be WP:OR. Also, I'm not homophobic. Calling me that is quite mean. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 01:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Pritzwalk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 21:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Knight class (Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Zdzisław Najmrodzki at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with ((db-g7)), or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was thinking about translating this, but it is has no footnotes on pl wiki, and I ham having trouble finding sources. Maybe you'd have better luck? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Piotrus:. I might have some time to help on the weekend. However there's one problem that I have noticed some time ago but didn't have time to talk about it anywhere. Basically, while Polish Wiki treats German-Polish Wars between 1002 and 1018 as 3 different conflicts (pl:Wojna polsko-niemiecka (1002–1005), pl:Wojna polsko-niemiecka (1007–1013), pl:Wojna polsko-niemiecka (1015–1018)), English Wiki have one article titled German–Polish War treating it as one big conflict. I think it should be checked is those conflicts are separate, or not, and if they are indeed separate events, we should break English article into 3 parts.

And about finding more sources, 2 of my tricks when it comes to Medival-Ages-related artucles are: 1. Look into Wikipedia articles about the rulers of the states that took part in the war (so Boleslaw the Brave, the king of Poland, and whoever was the Holly Roman Emperor empiror at the time + smaller HRE dukes who participated in the war). The articles should mention the war and maybe have some sources you can use. 2. When it comes to Polish leaders you can check poczet.com and zamki.name. Both websites list chronologically every events from lifes of Polish rulers, which indlude wars and international politics. Also, zamki.com always quote their sources, so you can write entire artiles just basing on that. Also, they sometimes have articles about wars.

Sincerely, Artemis Andromeda (talk) 18:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Zdzisław Najmrodzki at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Podlachians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monument of Railwayman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When creating catgories, such as Category:States and territories disestablished in 1264, you need to ensure you also create all the catgories of which they are a part. Do you plan to do so, or leave it to other editors to clean up after you? UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Well ok, I will start creating those as well. I didn't know. But, can I also ask you to stop deleting categories like "States and territories [dis]established in X", and removing them from articles.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, and will do, but there have been extensive discussions at WP:CFD as to whether specific-year precision is an appropriate categorization for events happening prior to the Renaissance, with most of those discussions concluding "No". UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Go over your created articles and follow best practices outlined at #WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages . With a cherry on top? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Artemis Andromeda: Could you please tell me why this flying officer is notable? scope_creep^Talk 23:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And this as well Jan Kowalski (RAF officer). Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 23:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I think I known why Jan Kowalski (RAF officer) is notable, but not Arsen Cebrzyński. Can you give me an idea why you think he is notable. scope_creep^Talk 11:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Zoob is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Zoob (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 11:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Knight class".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Republic of Mosina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Żywiec Zdrój requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 16:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please note that the spelling is references, not refrences - I've had to correct it at Łękawica (ordinary), Crozier head and Piast Dragon - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tunis, Sohag Governorate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Podlachians".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your articles. But :) In addition to repeating my request to use wikiproject talk assessment templates, please note how to display Polish (or another language) spelling properly. Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Mirza Bohdanowicz's Tatar Banner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Józef Latoszyński, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jan Wieszczycki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lithuanian raid on Mazovia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Peasant Group of Popular Councils, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 14:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Battle of Kopystrzyń, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 18:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Panama Canal Zone, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Sumanuil: I want to note that your edits, that were deleting my hard work (and which you did beacuse of one minnor typo), were also done with no comment what so ever. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really, don't you find it counterproductive to delete an edit with almost +1000 new characters, just over one changed character. Don't you think it was less destructive to just fix the problem with the file, or inform me that the file got broken by accident? Artemis Andromeda (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artemis Andromeda, I was just checking through a list of DYK nominations that had never been transcluded on the Nominations page, and ran across your nomination from the beginning of October. Oddly, despite the fact that you never transcluded the nomination on the DYK Nominations page, Piotrus somehow found the nomination and reviewed it; they also passed it. However, since the nomination had never been transcluded, it was never seen by potential promoters, and it still has not appeared on the Wikipedia main page in the DYK section.

Are you still interested in this nomination continuing? If so, I'll be happy to make sure it is placed on the Approved page and made available to prep set builders. Please let me know how you'd like me to proceed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I'm sorry to hear, that there was an issue with my nomination. I am not particularly good when it comes to operating on templates and nominations, so I can imagine I must have done something wrong while nominating the page. Yes, I am still interested in nominating the page. Thank you very much :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 14:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was probably looking at AA's contributions and didn't notice the transclusion wasn't finished... AA, I recommend using the script I link above (#Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs), it will ensure no manual errors happen. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Piotrus: Thank you. BTW, if you want to shorten my name, you can call me Arty :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artemis Andromeda, please note that there is still some work that needs to be done on the nomination. The details are on the DYK nomination page linked above; stop by as soon as you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Central Lithuania and Lithuanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

Thank you for creating Peasant Group of Popular Councils.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet significant coverage and notability for organisations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Whiteguru)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Józef Latoszyński".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jan Wieszczycki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Wietrzne Radio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi thanks for creating 17. województwo. When making use in en.wiki of material from another wiki, we have to add a template to the talk page so there us proper attribution for copyright reasons. I’ve added the template to the talk page so you can reuse it for future articles. All the best Mccapra (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Unprepared, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Province of 11 Szepes Towns, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Currently, none of the references contain enough information to pass WP:VERIFY.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)'Reply[reply]

I disagree. It has plenty of sources for article of its lenght, and its notable, as a historical state subdivision, and autonomous region.Artemis Andromeda (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Province of 16 Szepes Towns, is not suitable as written to remain published. The citations need more information in order to pass WP:VERIFY. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from John Troglita into Battle of Sbeitla. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 03:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zdzisław Najmrodzki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zdzisław Najmrodzki, a thief in 1970s–1980s Poland, escaped from law-enforcement authorities and prisons on 29 occasions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zdzisław Najmrodzki. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zdzisław Najmrodzki), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Flag of the Subcarpathian Voivodeship, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:N̨, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flag of Szczecin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Pritzwalk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "N̨".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Flag of Szczecin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Pritzwalk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ([6] [7] [8] [9]) I propose that you revert yourself and discuss the issue on the article's talk page. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duchy of Poland (c. 960–1025) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duchy of Poland (c. 960–1025) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Marcelus (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Coat of the Lubusz Voivodeship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 19:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories disestablished in 1386 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories established in 1076 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:States and territories established in 1079 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Artemis Andromeda. I found this article on WP:NPP and it is causing me some difficulty. The word "wingcloth" does not exist in the English language or English heraldry, and because the heraldic charge you're describing also does not exist in English heraldry, there is no obvious term for it to which I could move the article under a new name, unless it is one of the German terms "Kleestengel" or "Brustspange", because those will be less unfamiliar to English heraldry (see WP:COMMONNAME). I don't think that "Przepaska" would be accepted as an alternative title. When it is necessary to describe it in English in European coats of arms, it is usually just called a crescent. So as an independent article it is problematic. The actual content is useful and well-referenced, so for now I have added the greater part of it into the article Eagle (heraldry), but "Wingcloth", because it is not a real word, is of no use even as a redirect. I think that is the best that can be done. Ingratis (talk) 03:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For now, I've moved the article to Przepaska to move it out of harm's way, although as said I don't think that's a permanent solution, and put Wingcloth up for deletion as a non-existent word. The formal notification is below, to tick the boxes. All best, Ingratis (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wingcloth and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Wingcloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ingratis (talk) 06:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peasant Group of Popular Councils, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kopystrzyń, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're not a new editor, have you not learned WP:cut and paste moves aren't allowed? Please make sure to follow WP:CWW whenever you copy or translate content from one article to another. It's very important as there are legal implications if copyright isn't followed. (t · c) buidhe 15:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kopystrzyń".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tunis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wietrzne Radio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Thank you for creating Wartislaw II of Gdańsk.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@North8000: Thank you very much <3 :) Artemis Andromeda (talk) 09:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Thank you for creating Lower Prussia.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wietrzne Radio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Thank you for creating Lwów Voivodeship (1944–1945).

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, you seem to have the same image in two different place. Is the gallery actually needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Scope creep)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 17:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Flags introduced in 1822 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Albanian coat of arms indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Flag of Earth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flag_of_Earth. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Skipple ☎ 01:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

If you move an article from main space to User space or Draft space, please tag the original for speedy deletion, CSD R2 so admins can spot it and delete the page. Tagging pages for deletion is made easy if you use Twinkle which has a lot of great features that helps make editing simpler. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Subdivisions of Szczecin 1954–1976 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Bohemian Land, is not suitable as written to remain published. First, the translation of the title does not seem to pan out, as Země Česká translates as Czech land (country). And the sources support Země Česká, so this article might have to be retitled. Second, this appears to be rough translation, so it is difficult to follow, so I could not make corrections to it. What is called Země Česká seems to correspond to the former area called Bohemia, but not sure what the relationship is. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username EchidnaLives, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Flag of Elbląg, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: ((proposed deletion/dated...))
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|EchidnaLives)). And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Artemis Andromeda,

Congratulations! You won the second prize in the main category of Wikimedia CEE Spring 2022. In order to claim your voucher worth €50, please contact Manfred Werner.

Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Flag of Wawer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this short-lived flag.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Flag of Ursus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this flag which was used for just 5 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article Flag of Targówek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication found that this short-lived flag would be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see you're the one who added Perry the Platypus to the Fictional asexuals category. It makes no sense for something to be categorized based on something that's not even mentioned in the article. Can you please add relevant information, with a citation, to the text of the article? Allthegoodnamesaretaken2 (talk) 04:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Allthegoodnamesaretaken2: It was said in the article. Perry is confirmed to be asexual by Dan Povenmire (show co-creator). I guess that somebody removed that from the article. It's still lised on articles such as List of fictional asexuals Artemis Andromeda (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Elbląg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Elbląg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Białołęka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Białołęka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Bug River Poles. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda,

Thank you for creating Pawelekville.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, thanks for creating the article. Could you add more references to it?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Rejoy2003)). Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 11:21, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your work on Pawelekville. Happy editing

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 14:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wikipedia logo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Onu (pronoun). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Polish flags, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Lithuania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Marcin Mortka. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will write more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Coat of arms of Kociewie. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Polish Soviet Socialist Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Polish Soviet Socialist Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcelus (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monument of Railwayman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Jelonki, Warsaw, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1408 establishments in Poland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Sirish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 19 § Sirish until a consensus is reached. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Jelonki, Warsaw. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job at filling the article out and sourcing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Onel5969)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Onel5969: Thank you very much :)

An article you recently created, Śródmieście Południowe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe, and currently does not have any. The Obido source is not a reliable source. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Śródmieście Północne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. You recently made a change to the coat of arms of poland page in which you removed an image of the King of Poland in wearing, amongst other things, a heraldic tabard. I don’t necessarily disagree with this change, however, you didn’t leave any edit summary, so I’m mildly interested in why you thought this change was necessary. notadev (talk) 04:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @NotADev:. I did it because the template isn't to showcase old Middle Ages painting. It is to show .svg file depicting current coat of arms. It should be only for that. And any images there should depict current coat of arms and its variants. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I suppose so, yeah. I didn’t add that image to infobox, however seeing as various other coats of arms pages display a heralds tabard on the infobox it seemed to myself as a useful depiction to include on the infobox, but since such doesn’t exist for Poland it doesn’t really make sense. Nonetheless thank you for taking the time to answer. notadev (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please stop moving these to English translations. This is not mandated by WP:UE unless the English translations are commonly used. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Służewiec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ksawerów.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. Thank you for your work on Skyliner II. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi. This is close, but it could use an additional in-depth source (or 2).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Onel5969)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Skyliner II, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Australian Business Culture Centre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 02:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I doubt paih.gov.pl is an independent source, since it is a gov. website. New Challenge is not independent either. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 02:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Polish Chamber of Commerce Australia. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 06:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Artemis Andromeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bohemian Land, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, Embassy of the United Arab Emirates, Warsaw, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Populated places established in 1408 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]