Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Phrases such as "pacesetter and luminary figure", "contributed immensely", and "the profession has attained amiable heights" are promotional, not encyclopedic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Atibrarian/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Atibrarian/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atibrarian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really new here and I would love to have someone guide me through or a mentor. Thanks GoingBatty for your review. I will effect corrections and resubmit. Atibrarian (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really new here and I would love to have someone guide me through or a mentor Atibrarian (talk) 23:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello welcome! You can check the Wikipedia Teahouse and ask your questions or Adopt a user to find someone that can mentor you. Em-mustapha ^talk 22:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to inline citations, please remove the leading space from each paragraph.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Ehimigbai Ifidon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Ehimigbai Ifidon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoingBatty were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide additional independent reliable sources (i.e. sources not created by LRCN). Phrases such as "The council ever since, has continue to wax stronger" seem promotional, not encyclopedic. Also, please read the essay Wikipedia:Avoid mission statements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Librarians' Registration Council of Nigeria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Librarians' Registration Council of Nigeria, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atibrarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Em-mustapha ^talk 22:58, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 12:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Ehimigbai Ifidon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:35, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Librarians' Registration Council of Nigeria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing! gobonobo ^{+ c} 15:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Neemat Daud Abdulrahim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. First three sources in the article are self-published websites so not reliable, fourth source is a passing mention so not significant coverage, fifth source is the homepage of a website with no linked article, sixth source is a paper she wrote so not independent. WP:BEFORE not turning up additional sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Neemat Daud Abdulrahim, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It must be a mistake, didn't notice. Atibrarian (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neemat Daud Abdulrahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neemat Daud Abdulrahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am working to improve the article to meet the required standards ASAP! by adding more reliable references. Atibrarian (talk) 22:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atibrarian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adamu Usman Garko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I would like to improve the article by making useful edits Atibrarian (talk) 08:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammed Bello Koko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohammed Bello Koko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No progress on addressing notability since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Adamu Usman Garko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to Ambrose Alli University appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name(s) of persons added are past alumni of the Institution recognized (President's NYSC Honours Award) for their contributions to society. Atibrarian (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed Abdulkadir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Abdulkadir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Femi Ilesanmi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Per WP:CIRC. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Femi Ilesanmi, you may be blocked from editing. Per WP:CIRC. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about that, i didn't mean to "disrupt" or use "poorly sourced" content. I will check out the "citing sources". Warm regards. Atibrarian (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for adding sources to the Gabriel Agbonlahor article. Unfortunately, all of the changes you made had issues:

• first change: the source (BBC) is good, but it does not support the claim that it was the player's first goal of the season,
• second change: same good source, but, again, it does not support the claims made,
• third change: Agbonlahor's Soccerway profile is used, a decent source. However, it does not support the claims – Soccerway does not record assists,
• fourth change: Soccerway profile, does not support the claims. "Honour" was the correct British spelling,
• fifth change: Soccerway profile, does not support the claims.

I reverted the addition of the Soccerway references and corrected the use of the BBC one. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftifying on the suspicion of conflict on interest editing. Please pass through WP:AFC

Hello Atibrarian. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Benita Iyere Okogie, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Atibrarian. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Atibrarian|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Celestina007 (talk) 22:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you are tagging me as a "paid Advocate" which I am not. I am not in any way related to or known the subject in person. I am only interested in improving or creating new articles relating to Edo State and her people. Atibrarian (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As outlined in the template you aren’t allowed to move the page back to mainspace until you have discussed this, it is disruptive and counter productive. Ah! I see Mattythewhite already has spoken to you about disruptive editing in the past. Now pertaining to UPE, please explain this to me, how is that in your first article created this one you are competent and are familiar with our wiki markup but in your most recent article Draft:Benita Iyere Okogie you are making “NEWBIE” errors? like emboldening section headings? Please can you kindly explain this to me Celestina007 (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it appears my new article: Benita Iyere Okogie, reflects that of a "NEWBIE". However, I am still a "NEWBIE" because I am still learning the robe of Wikipedia editing. The "emboldened heading" was a result of me typing the article in Microsoft Word before moving it to Wikipedia editor.

Mattythewhite claims are not "concrete" as the references used are accurate and reliable. I would have responded to his observations but I am not that a PRO - to respond with appropriate tags/referencing - so I just let go. I know how straining it is for me in creating these articles.

Over the past year, I have learned from errors I make while editing or creating an article. I am scared of making mistakes.

Warm Regards

Atibrarian (talk) 00:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

@Atibrarian, The "emboldened heading" was a result of me typing the article in Microsoft Word before moving it to Wikipedia editor how so? Our markup is our markup and using Microsoft word doesn’t invalidate that. However why have you move warred rather than pass the article through AFC? as advised? How also are you in possession of this file as your own work and haven’t declared a COI? Celestina007 (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file might reflect as my "own" not because I owned it but because I mistakenly not use the appropriate tag - "NEWBIE" Atibrarian (talk) 01:32, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So how then did you get the file? Celestina007 (talk) 06:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• FWIW, The photo was taken as a screenshot from this YouTube video. Alternatively, the photo cannot be used on Wikipedia, because the YouTube video is not released under Creative Commons license Attribution 3.0 Unported. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 12:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benita Iyere Okogie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benita Iyere Okogie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Atibrarian, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atibrarian,

Your article was moved, twice, to Draft and to User space, which are safer areas of the project to work on and develop new article but you kept recreating it in the main space of the project which has raised suspicions and caused it to be nominated for deletion. If you are a new editor and you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. Atibrarian (talk) 01:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was engrossed in improving the article and didn't see the notification on time. Atibrarian (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]