History of mechanical engineering, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I redirected Pre-dawn raid to Police raid per WP:BOLD. Bearian (talk) 01:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I want to let you know that I have removed the PROD tag you placed on Aluminum internal combustion engine because per WP:PROD: PROD is one-shot only: It must not be used for pages PRODed before or previously discussed at AfD or FfD, and proposed deletion cannot be used with redirects. Consider starting another discussion at Articles for deletion or see if one of the speedy deletion criteria applies. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you please look over my recent minor edit to X-15 Flight 3-65-97? I’m not sure it’s worded correctly. Feel free to revert it, or let me know what you think and I’ll change it. Thanks! BTW, found you on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering page. The unrelated kinsman (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would personally remove "unstable" as the sentence provides context for that already but its good overall. - AH (talk) 22:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will do, thanks. The unrelated kinsman (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord teamReply[reply]

That article was pretty bad. Thanks for working on it. But you removed a lot of cited content (even adjacent to content that has many-years-old "uncited" tags). That doesn't seem on its face like "cleanup". Could you please explain more clearly your basis for specific removals, and keeping other related uncited content? DMacks (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I removed a lot content that was cited, that is true. But many of the citations did not support the actual claims in the article and were simply a reference to the existence of a certain organization or fact. The sentences would speculate and word weasel on a subject. For example:

100 to 500 Hz Research showed that loud sound at 100 to 500 Hz caused vibration, and at high powers cavitation and damage.:32–35[clarification needed]

This sentence contains a citation and even a page number for the fact that a 100-500 hz sound could harm a person, but it does not provide for any reason to include in in the article nor any actual applications, or secondary sources of possible applications of the wave length. - AH (talk) 15:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for the explanation (and especially for the legwork in ref-checking!). DMacks (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have changed the words and lines because they were same as the proutglobe.org (10 points demand presented........ Meet, (one reference). Thanks. প্রসেনজিৎ পাল (talk) 06:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do not remove crossover attributions like this, as they preserve our copyright legal compliance. Do that again and you may face administrator actions, including blocks, because we must abide by United States copyright law. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My bad, I was just trying to move over the templates. - AH (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK, good. Thankyou for adding the generals' names. Now, the Medical Corps (Egypt). They have about 20 fixed, base, hospitals across Egypt. If you can find, with references, the list of all those twenty hospitals, we could set up a separate article for the Medical Corps. Can you do that? Would be great to have any more references on the field army medical units too.. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For Medical Corps (Egypt) - this is great!! Great work!! I actually moved it to Armed Forces Medical Service Department because you said the MSD was more clearly responsible Buckshot06 (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is absolutely great!! Great work!! Would you mind considering doing something else? We have a few divisions without references for their location - eg 7th and 16th Mechanised Divisions in Second Army (Egypt). Would you be able to find a reference for where those divisional bases are? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 02:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I found https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/egypt/army-orbat.htm which seems to be a circa 1990s order of battle for the egyptian army. It is clearly outdated/inaccurate in some aspects but provides a level of detail for other units that we don't have. Example of inaccuracy includes: I have seen multiple sources say a 1st field army does not exist and multiple others omit any mention adding to the claim but it claims one does. - AH (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Most of what they have is a copy of a very inaccurate Wikipedia page which used to be on here. The First Army (United Arab Republic) is an example. That gs.org page should be removed - certainly, do not use it. No, what I was asking you to do is to look in the Arab internet for recent, reliable,Buckshot06 (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC) references to the divisional locations. Do not use or go anywhere near globalsecurity.org for that data. Thanks !!Reply[reply]

Please give me the space to communicate with Sepavo and to make sure he fills in the references properly!! There are about 4 people looking at this very obscure page right now - let's bend the rules for a while so we can persuade him to insert the references - unless you wish to hunt them down!! Buckshot06 (talk) 07:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Aight - AH (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thankyou. But he appears now to have inserted the references; would you please go back through the Arabic links and check them? Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 07:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Also, for the Medical Corps, I cannot find any sources for hospital ships. I am going to delete the 3 hospital ships and 4 hospital barges unless you can find some WP:RELIABLE sources about them. Can you find any sources about them? Buckshot06 (talk) 07:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 11:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]