test

I can see your user-page, and it is editable; perhaps problems with your computer/connection? And if you cannot get back to Wikipeida, how did you manage to send the feedback?

Lectonar (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AzseicsoK, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzseicsoK. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Sarah (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

You are correct, I did not answer your question, as another Teahouse host did. But, they forgot to post a talkback template to your page, so I did. Sorry for the confusion :) Sarah (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

	The Minor barnstar
	I, Sarah, hereby award you, AzseicsoK, with the Minor Barnstar for your excellent clean up efforts related to science, transportation, NYC & DC (I live in DC!) and beyond. Thanks so much, your small but very important efforts help to make Wikipedia the world's largest encyclopedia! Keep up the great work. Sarah (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking after a variety of things. In case you didn't know about it, the ((dead link)) template can be used to mark dead links. In the specific case of Plants for a Future, the pages seem to still exist, just under a different URL, for example [1]. Kingdon (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wait, that was an IP editor, not you, at Amphicarpaea bracteata. Never mind. Kingdon (talk) 17:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzseicsoK. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cheers, Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 15:53, 24 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((teahouse talkback)) template).[reply]

I never claimed that sortable was less useful than formatting headings but Koopatrev asked how to use colspan and rowspan so that was the question I answered and I was suggesting that getting that right before trying to make a table sortable was a good idea. NtheP (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AzseicsoK,

why did you remove that little mushroom from the category "Marasmiaceae"?

Kind regards Gänseblümchentee (talk) 20:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. Uporządnicki (talk) 21:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Uporządnicki/AzseicsoK. I saw your message at Talk:Joule heating, and I thought I would try to make things a little clearer. Whether what I am going to say will do that or not, I don't know, but I hope so. Before saying anything else, though, I will point out that the talk page of an article is for discussion relating to editing the article, not for asking general questions about the subject of the article, and the right place for such general questions is Wikipedia:Reference desk, in this case specifically Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. If what I say is not helpful enough, you may like to try asking there. However, for now I am moving your question from Talk:Joule heating to this page, and attempting to answer it here. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For many years, I've puzzled over a paradox; I've looked at this and other articles in Wikipedia several times over the past couple of years, hoping it would be addressed.
The article starts by saying that electric current moves through a resistance and generates heat; you can read that in a thousand places, and every scientifically minded school kid knows it. But now, here's the difficulty. We have Q = I²R. Increase the resistance R while keeping the current I the same, and the heat produced, Q (in a perfect system of course) will increase proportionally to R.
But in most situations--virtually any household situation, for example--things are provided a more or less constant voltage. So by Ohm's law, when you increase the resistance R, the current I decreases proportionally. Conversely, decrease R, and you increase I. But then, while the heat produced Q changes with the resistance R, it changes with the SQUARE of the current I.
The upshot is, as you increase the resistance in a typical application, you decrease the heat produced. And as you decrease the resistance, you increase the heat. So in a typical plug-in appliance with a heating element, a LOWER resistance should produce MORE heat.
This seems to fly in the face of the idea that the current flows through the resistance and produces heat.
Puzzling through this question, I do start to think that if the resistance of the heating element starts to get comparable to the resistance of whatever is supplying the voltage (and it must have some; typically, the electricity will come through wires, which have SOME small resistance), then the whole system would break down. I wonder if that is the answer to this conundrum.
I keep hoping I'll find it explained somewhere. Uporządnicki (talk) 03:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Certainly a lower resistance produces more heat. Try unplugging an electric kettle. How much resistance is there now between the two terminals in the plug outlet, which are connected by the air? Answer: a huge resistance, virtually infinite. How much heat is produced? Answer: virtually none. Now plug the kettle in, so that the terminals are connected through the kettle's circuitry, which will have a much lower resistance than the air. A significant amount of heat will be produced. When I was a schoolboy, in a physics lesson I once tried connecting the terminals of a Daniel cell with a piece of copper wire, which would have very little resistance at all. I can promise you that it produced an ENORMOUS amount of heat, and I was lucky not to seriously burn myself. Less resistance does give more heat, without a doubt.
2. You say that this "seems to fly in the face of the idea that the current flows through the resistance and produces heat". However, the point is that, as you yourself pointed out, with more resistance you get less current (assuming constant voltage), and the drop in heat due to that drop in current is more than enough to counteract the increase in current due to the increase in resistance.
3. You raise the question of what happens if "resistance of the heating element starts to get comparable to the resistance of whatever is supplying the voltage". If a circuit is attached to a power supply, and the resistance of the circuit drops down so low that it is equal to the resistance of the power supply, then the same amount of heat will be dissipated in the circuit and in the power supply. Typically, this will be an enormous amount of heat, and it may well be enough to completely burn out the power supply (depending, of course, on the particular power supply). The voltage will also be equally divided between the external circuit and the internal resistance of the power supply, so that the voltage applied to the external circuit will be half of what it was with a higher external circuit resistance, but it will still be enough to generate a lot of heat. If you go further still, and reduce the external circuit resistance to less than the internal resistance of the power supply, then most of the voltage will be used in pushing current through the power supply's internal resistance, only a minority of the voltage will be provided to the external circuit, and the amount of heat generated in the external circuit will drop as the resistance increases, but the amount of heat generated inside the power supply will continue to increase. Eventually, if you reduce the external resistance to zero (e.g. connect the power supply terminals directly together) then no heat at all will be produced in the external circuit, but a hell of a lot of heat will be generated in the power supply resistance. In fact, something very much like that happened in my rather stupid experiment with the Daniel cell: both the wire I connected and the cell itself got extremely hot. In fact, if the hot wire hadn't burnt my fingers and made me drop it within a fraction of a second, the cell would probably have produced so much heat that it would have exploded. If that had happened, I would have almost certainly been either dead or seriously disfigured for life. To summarise: (1) as far as the total amount of heat generated is concerned, the less resistance you have, the more heat you will get; (2) as far as the amount of heat generated in the external circuit is concerned, ignoring heat generated inside the power supply, the amount of heat will be a maximum if the external resistance is equal to the power supply's internal resistance, and will decrease as the external resistance moves away from that value, either by increasing or decreasing. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eugene Maurice, Count of Soissons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• He died at [[Unna]] in [[Westphalia]] in 1673, out of a deadly fever (although there were voices that he had been poisoned.<ref>((cite book|first=Franz|last= Herre|title=
• [[Category:House of Savoy]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Caulanthus anceps may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• can generally be found in areas with [[alkali soils|alkaline soils]]. This [[Annual plant|annual]] {Herbaceous plant|herb]] produces an erect, waxy-textured stem with lance-shaped leaves borne on [[Petiole (botany)|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Caulanthus pilosus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• is an [[Annual plant|annual]] or occasionally [[Perennial plant|perennial]] Herbaceous plant|herb]] coated in thin hairs.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mordellistena disempta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Mordellistena|disempta]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cyrioxus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Monotypic arthropod genera]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of variable stars may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of variable stars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:90%;"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orthogonius pangi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Orthogonius pangi|]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AzseicsoK, I noticed you are busy sorting moth species in appropriate categories, my sincere thanks for that! I try to make categories for new articles I create, but this family was so big I was not feeling up to it. Nice to see you are picking this up. Cheers and keep it up! Ruigeroeland (talk) 13:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black mamba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Reptiles of Africa]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fellow Wikipedian!

I am excited to announce the upcoming Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting at the National Archives! We'll have free lunch, an introduction by Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, and a discussion featuring Ed Summers, the creator of CongressEdits. Join your fellow DC-area Wikipedians on Saturday, October 18 from 12 to 4:30 PM. RSVP today!

Also coming up we have the Human Origins edit-a-thon on October 17 and the WikiSalon on October 22. Hope to see you at our upcoming events!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 08:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Please your completion fill out this Articles The volleyball team and other players. Development volleyball in wikipedia Are waiting you. Good luck. Jacilason (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your useful work improving the categorization of some plant articles. For future reference, the hybrid sign (×) is to some degree optional in the names of species: very long established hybrids are usually treated as "good" species. Forms with and without the × are exactly the same name under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. Hence it's conventional in botanical works to sort alphabetically based solely on the epithet. So Agave × arizonica, for example, should be sorted alphabetically as if it were Agave arizonica. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzseicsoK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great work categorizing spider genera! Please note that when a monotypic genus, like Sonoita, has to be at the species name because of disambiguation (see WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA), categories related to the genus are placed on the redirect. Sonoita lightfooti is not a "monotypic genus", so shouldn't be categorized as such. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I actually knew that--think I learned it early on--in this long, LONG project. I hope there aren't too many cases of that that I missed--in this long, LONG project (which I'm now seeing the end of!). Uporządnicki (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, AzseicsoK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzseicsoK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The silver line stations *were* added in a logical order: Alphabetical. The only reason that they don't look that way is that Loudon Gateway was formerly Route 606 station. Having said that, the logical order is probably *completely* alphabetical including Potomac Yard.Naraht (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But then, what about Ashburn? Anyway, I've put the Silver Line stations in their order of running outbound; then, since--conveniently--the Potomac Yards station is slated to open later than the Silver Line ones, I've tacked that at the end. Uporządnicki (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I dug back and found it. Ashburn was originally Route 722. Anyway, you have a point. The existing stations are listed alphabetically, so these should be, too. I'll probably go in and change it when I'm not at work (unless someone else gets to it first--in which case I won't object!). Uporządnicki (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to lunch and then I'm off for a while. Have fun. Remember Wikipedia doesn't have deadlines. :)Naraht (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Antirrhinum species, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Section (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have concerns about editors who take it upon themselves to 'fix' hundreds of articles. This includes my recent query at Teahouse about an editor truncating school articles, and also my own efforts at editing (improving?) nutrition and dietary supplement articles, the foundation being my university and career history. All I can say is good faith is good faith, and not to 'own' articles (even those one raised to GA). Happy editing. David notMD (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@user:David notMD, I'm not at all clear what point you're trying to make by posting this comment here on my talk page. First thought is, could it have to do with all the categorization work I've done over the years--but I doubt that. Since that doesn't involve anything substantive, only organizational, I can't see anyone having a reasonable problem with it. Is it a personal response to some comment I've made somewhere? Uporządnicki (talk) 12:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@user:David notMD, Oh. Now I see your post at the Teahouse about Overly Aggressive Deleting. I guess your comment here refers to that. But I'm still puzzled why you decided to message me individually about it. Uporządnicki (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you had written "I have discovered literally many thousands of articles (mostly on species) for which the categorization could be improved--or was out of date, or just plain wrong." and so was commenting to you about high activity editors (including myself). No intent to imply that your actions were/are out of line. David notMD (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@user:David notMD Yeah, I did write that. It's 99+% of what I've done here in Wikipedia. I know it's been many thousands. I recently went through a category in which most of the articles belonged in subcategories that were already set up--but nobody had moved them. I moved things into their subcategories and reduced the main category from well over 4000 articles to a couple of hundred. And I've done a fair number of projects of similar size, and countless smaller ones. OK, so that's why you decided to share your thoughts. Uporządnicki (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Took me a couple of minutes, but I found it. I wrote it here: Wikipedia:Teahouse#Frequent_Grammer_Issues.

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ContentTranslation?from=de&to=pt&page=Neuroonkologie&targettitle=Neuroonkologie. Wname1 (talk) 06:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Category:Geomitridae stub has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzseicsoK,

I assumed you wanted this category deleted based on your edit summaries on it. If I'm incorrect, let me know and I'll restore it. Sorry that this notice sounds unnecessarily harsh. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think that edit was a bit over the top. Yes, the asker is young / rash / impolite / whatever, so your initial dress-down was justified; but I do not see the need to come back for a second serving. Tigraan^{Click here for my talk page ("private" contact)} 17:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, point taken Uporządnicki (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'm old / cantankerous / crotchety. Uporządnicki (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pyrausta (moth)-stub has been nominated for renaming to Template:Pyrausta-stub. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's talk page. Thank you. Her Pegship (?) 19:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AzseicsoK!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]