Welcome to my talk page. If you have any concerns, suggestions, or if you would just like to contact me, feel free to do so here.

Note: I delete bot-created (after they have been dealt with) and unnecessary sections.

Hello B3251! Your additions to King’s Square, Saint John have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! I understand. I’d there a way you that I could write the history section without plagiarizing, yet still using the monument (the picture I took) as a reference? The source I previously attached simply displayed the text of what was on the monument, so I wasn’t sure how plagiarism worked there. Thanks for letting me know. B3251 (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can use https://www.hmdb.org/m.asp?m=77534 as your source, but the content has to be re-written in your own words. Don't use the photo as a source; the photo is nominated for deletion. — Diannaa (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:QPlex, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, B3251! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Elliot Page, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Just about everyone reading the article will know what Canada is and it's not especially relevant to the lead section, so linking it there isn't necessary. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 18 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Carberry highway collision, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Anarchyte (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carberry highway collision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carberry highway collision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

EvergreenFir (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carberry highway collision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carberry highway collision (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

EvergreenFir (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. Thank you for your work on Borderlands 2: Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello B3251,

You stated in your edit summary here that you made the edit per an email request. Who was the sender? Based on the contents of the edit, it appears that you might have inadvertently proxied on behalf of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken! My rule when it comes to email requests is to tell the sender to make the edit themself for exactly this reason. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll be even stronger. Don't ever make edits because somebody sent you an email asking you to. You're just proxying for a sockpuppet. RoySmith (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RoySmith: That's exactly what I said! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Somebody named Macroduck sent me the email. Apologies for contributing based on an email request, I was unaware of the potential circumstances on why I could have received the request and now that I know, it won’t happen again. Thanks! B3251 (talk) 00:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. RoySmith (talk) 00:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, same happened to me here. Got an e-mail from Macroduck too. Thankfully I didn't edit on his behalf. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 07:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Borderlands 2: Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nick Eh 30. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there, I just expanded onto the article and added more content/sources to establish notability, and it's currently pushed up to 10,000+ bytes. I'd like to publish it to the mainspace again, but I would like to receive confirmation before doing so. Thanks. B3251 (talk) 20:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Forgot to ping, MJL. B3251 (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for the ping. Yeah, that's good enough for me. I can't say anyone else won't take issue, but it has the bare minimum now. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for checking in on it again. I'll move it back to the mainspace. B3251 (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 4 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Taylor (photographer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that George Thomas Taylor was one of Canada's earliest nature photographers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Taylor (photographer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George Taylor (photographer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Taylor (photographer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article George Taylor (photographer) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:George Taylor (photographer) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

why? BarneyTheFarmy (talk) 01:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

those reading an article on steven crowder likely have a basic understanding on american conservatism; it's pretty basic and it doesn't need a link. additionally, changing "conservative" sites to "right-wing" sites requires proper justification to do so. B3251 (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A conservative is a right-wing wing person. And not everyone knows what a conservative is, that's what wikipedias for, to educate people. And why is it such a big deal that you revert my edit when I'm just trying to educate people? BarneyTheFarmy (talk) 02:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If somebody doesn't know what a conservative is, they'll look it up. What I'm saying is that somebody actively seeking to read the article about Steven Crowder likely already knows what a conservative is, so adding an unnecessary link is not needed as per MOS:OL. Additionally, I'd argue and say that conservatism and right-wing ideology is not the same. B3251 (talk) 02:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you remove the recent speed situation on the Ishowspeed article 81.158.189.59 (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

look at the talk page B3251 (talk) 19:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 18 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Killing of O'Shae Sibley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Beyoncé paid tribute to O'Shae Sibley, a gay man who was killed after vogueing to her music, on her official website? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Killing of O'Shae Sibley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Killing of O'Shae Sibley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Borderlands 2: Tiny Tina's Assault on Dragon Keep.
Message added 09:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there, feel free to close down the nomination. I don't think I'll have the time to work on it, and I've moved on to other projects. B3251 (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. Thank you for your work on Admiral Beatty Hotel. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Tails Wx)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 00:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Tails Wx: thank you! B3251 (talk) 00:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor demanding to approve edits to a page. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of incarcerated musicians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of incarcerated musicians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 21 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Admiral Beatty Hotel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following its closure, the former Admiral Beatty Hotel was converted into a senior citizens' apartment building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Admiral Beatty Hotel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. Thank you for your work on 1 Million March 4 Children. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey @SunDawn, Thanks for reviewing my page. Always happy to help. :) B3251 (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on 1 Million March 4 Children requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Raladic (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1 Million March 4 Children is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Million March 4 Children until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  06:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canadian Pacific Airlines Flight 307, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Admiral Beatty Hotel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How is my edit irrelevant? It's in the "diet and ecology" section, specifically next to the part that mentions the jaguar's predation on aquatic reptiles. I don't understand your reasoning at all. Chumzwumz68 (talk) 20:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You added a singular case to a "hunting and diet" section, in FA-fashion that would be stuck to Jaguar's typical hunting and diet behavior. Adding a singular case in which one particular jaguar hunted and killed something isn't relevant to the typical hunting & diet section. If a singular case happened for a mammal hunting & eating a human, that wouldn't be added to their 'hunting and diet' section, no? B3251 (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is very relevant if it is the first recorded case of one species preying on another, especially if the two are apex predators. I want to know the exact wording in a "featured article" guidelines that wouldn't allow for something like this to be added. Chumzwumz68 (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Generally speaking, I wouldn't consider FA-class articles would include random one-off events to be in what is dedicated to sharing the normal behavior for a Jaguar. I, however, am not an expert and I'd recommend seeking input from @LittleJerry, as I know they're quite known for their major contributions towards articles on mammals. B3251 (talk) 23:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems too random. What is so special about a jaguar preying on a certain species of crocodile for the first time? Its already mentioned that jagaurs prey on reptiles. Its more important for the article on the crocodile species then the jaguar. LittleJerry (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think it's random at all. It's relevant within the flow of the article, is in the right section of the article, and adds more about the ecology and diet of the jaguar. Before this find jaguars were not known to prey on crocodiles, only caimans, so I think it's a good thing to add. I don't think anything is lost by adding this information Chumzwumz68 (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with LittleJerry. It is quite random to add and for a high-quality article, because you generally want to avoid adding in pretty irrelevant instances that can drift away from the main point: the typical Jaguar hunting & diet behavior. Adding one instance in which a jaguar preyed on a crocodile doesn't necessarily add more to the ecology & diet because the rarity of this incident shows that this isn't relevant to the spread of knowledge surrounding its diet. It reads more-so like a random fact more than anything. B3251 (talk) 17:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To keep the discussion on the article page on-topic, moving this part here: CNA is an RS. The first discussion you linked was poorly populated (not outright discarding it, but limited participation and lack of clear, policy driven rationale reduce it to being an inconclusive discussion). The second discussion mentions CNA once, in a list but provides no reason why it's in the list (by that metric, WashPo and WSJ would be discarded). The final discussion features HEB—a very good editor with whom I've worked on a couple articles— outnumbered by other editors who articulated why the EWTN-branded pubs are generally fringe-y while CNA is not.

Mere mention of a source at the discussion board is not enough to present it as questionable; there should be ready evidence of a consensus against using an outlet. By saying that a source is questionable, you imply strong evidence to this end. There is not good evidence for CNA being unreliable (for example, in HEB's case, conflation with the distinct website Catholic Culture seemed to be a factor). If you have clear reasons to doubt CNA's reliability based on specific and verified cases of poor reporting, academic review that found CNA inaccurate, or CNA blatantly peddling in conspiracies, please notify the discussion board.

Sorry if this sounds curt, as you are only acting in good faith and wanted to provide a nuanced view on a contentious topic. I've had to explain how CNA and similar independent, sectarian-interest news organizations work in the past both on Wikipedia and in my professional life, so I occasionally get frustrated when I have to relitigate it. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While the discussions are not very great in of themselves, I still feel that Catholic-ran sources, particularly on a topic such as the Canadian Indian residential school system, should have its reliability questioned due to its Catholic perspective being offered in such kind of a topic. I find this different from sources such as WashPo and WSJ due to both of those sources not being linked to the religious or particular affiliation/organization who, in this particular case, the Catholic church in Canada's involvement in the Residential school system. Due to that nature, I'd consider sources offered from a Catholic perspective should almost always be put under questioning prior to being used on such a topic in order to avoid potential bias in such a field. In the case of residential schools, I, personally, would strictly avoid sources from a Catholic perspective in favour of sources that can be ensured to be WP:RS and neutral on the topic. That's all I really need to say, I guess. Again, I also recommend reaching out to the reliable sources noticeboard if you'd like to seek further consensus. B3251 (talk) 02:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is me very lightly pushing back on you in this. CNA is not administratively part of the Catholic Church and has been the news org to break many cases of abuse by members–including by leadership–in the church. Articles are not strictly from a Catholic perspective; reporting favors issues relevant to Catholics and will demonstrate a greater degree of expertise in nomenclature on issues related to the church, but it is akin to other special-interest publications in this regard (indeed, some CNA writers are not Catholic). We cite several indigenous tribes and their reports within the residential school gravesite article. Most of the tribal reports are not editorially independent from the tribal hierarchy (and that's a good thing), but we accurately accept them as generally reliable instances of self-reporting. Having dealt with Catholic and Catholic-adjacent articles for the entirety of my time editing Wikipedia, I can say that CNA is essentially the only Catholic-interest outlet that is on a level of reliability approaching that papers of record (though Union of Catholic Asian News's English-language reporting is getting better). ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, not relevant to what you and I are engaging about, as this is plainly an open discussion with good reasons for our positions, but the IP we were both engaging with on the article talk has been blocked for evasion (the original was blocked for trolling). If you don't mind, I would like to pull your comments and place them in a separate section of the talk page and collapse the troll's comments. Let me know what you think. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ B3251 (talk) 03:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

literal lol at that, so thank you. Hope you have a good one, and happy editing :). ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You too, I wish you well with your IP discourse. B3251 (talk) 03:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yamaha PSR-275, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cape Bald Packers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

At least for pre-1867 emigrants Ontario and Quebec I do not think are the names we want. First off although in common usage people referred to Canada East and Canada West in 1865 the place was actually one place the Province of Canada which is sometimes called the United Province of Canada. I am thinking for 1841-1867 the Category would be best named Emigrants from the United Province of Canada. I think we need the United so people understand what we mean, and I think we should go by political dividions of the time. Large parts of modern Quebec and Ontario were outside the limits of thos Province. Before 1841 I think we might have Upper and Lower Canada cats.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm all for creating categories for Upper Canada, Lower Canada, Canada West, etc... would you like to do that with me? I'll start with Canada West. B3251 (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

on second thought, I'll scrap that idea. I'll start with just the Province of Canada right now and try to start rearranging categories. Is that alright? B3251 (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That said I also wonder if maybe we are going too low scale. Maybe we should name the Category Category:Emigrants from British North America and link it to our existing article on British North America. I have read through that now, and am beginning to think we might be going too small scale. Especially since there was even an Arctic Islands Territory. I am biggining to think Emigrants from British North America for 1783-1907 is the way to go, although after 1873 there is not much there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I feel like British North America is a bit broad and is already somewhat exemplified in the already-existing Pre-Confederation Canada category. The Province of Canada should be good enough as there's several articles of individuals from Upper or Canada West. Unless you're thinking of moving the New Brunswick category there? That being said, New Brunswick emigrants should be a category as well as for individuals from the Province of Canada (Upper Canada & Canada West) as to make sure it's not too messy. B3251 (talk) 02:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have to admit I think we should use categorizes that would make sense to the people at the time, unless doing so would be too confusing for us. In 1910 "Turkey" was used to mean the Ottoman Empire, but if we were to start categoizing every national of the Ottoman Empire are "Turkish" it would create confusion, and even if we had "1910 establishments" and included everything started that year within the Ottoman Empire it would cause confusion, so we use "Ottoman Empire" even though it was not the common name. In 1850 no one referred to "pre-confederation Canada" because no one knew that the confederation would occur. British North America was a designation for the broad area. I am thinking we could have an emigrant category for people from all parts of it going elsewhere. We have other broad categories like Category:Emigrants from the Holy Roman Empire. My other fear about pre-confederation categories is people will try to include those who lived in non-British areas, specifically before 1763, although with emigration categories I am not sure that is an issue.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:07, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• The first two people in the pre-Confederation Canada emigrants to the United States category look like they would belong in Category:Colony of Nova Scotia emigrants to the United States. The 3rd Elias Bradshaw, shows why we might want to consider a broad Category:Emigrants from British North American to the United States (or whatever exaactly if the best way to formulate that name). He came in 1831, so there was no Province of Canada, there was Upper Canada and Lower Canada. The article does not say which he lived in (I think we can assume he lived in one). My guess is he most likely lived in Upper Canada, but we should not be more precise than sourcing allows. He clearly would fit in the potential Category:Emigrants from British North America to the United States. We already have Category:Emigrants from the British West Indies to the United States. There is another advantage to not being super specific on these categories. Because of the ease of movement between especially geographically connected British colonies, the last place a person lived in British North America before they came to the US is quite possibly not defining. Some of these Emigrants from British North America to the United States will in fact be men who were raised in Montreal or the Toronto region, then worked for a company based in Montreal for about a decade in Ruper's Land, and then decided to head south and settle in Missouri. So do we call them emigrants from the last place they lived, or from where they started out? We would not call someone who moved from Nova Scotia to the United Province of Canada in 1842, became an elected official there, and died in 1866 an Emigrants from the Colony of Nova Scotia to the Province of Canada, so I am thinking that for emigration purposes we probably want to have one category that links people by their starting point.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boathouse (clothing store), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deluxe French Fries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dyane Léger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noel Winters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake family murders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, but could the violating edit please be provided to show that I have violated WP:BLP by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content? As far as I know, all I've added to the 2023 Lewiston shootings is information from Maine-based sources, regarding the name of the suspect allegedly released. I apologize if what I did wasn't right in any way but is that not what is often done in cases such as this? Adding the name of a suspect from clearly sourced material? I find this warning to be a little too harsh, all edits I have made have been done so while assuming good faith. My edits show that I have removed WP:OR and made slight corrections/improvements to the ongoing article, and any content I added has been done so while providing non-defamatory, clear news sources. Sorry. B3251 (talk) 03:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Acroterion Just a quick question. is this the edit you are referring to? If you checked my edits beforehand, you could see that I added the two citations for the naming of this suspect. Someone had later removed the passage and not the sources, which confused me, so I added it back because the sources clearly mentioned the name of the suspect being released as (NAME).

This has now been reported by more major news outlets, but I don't see what violation I broke. I added clear, WP:GF information sourced from Maine-based sources. It's not really a surprise that the suspect would be named by more local-based news outlets before the more mainstream outlets get to reporting it. B3251 (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The first eference that was attached to the name was decidedly sketchy, and happened at a time when major news outlets were explicitly careful about not naming a name. I saw no name in the second reference, and one or two sources are nowhere near enough to assert that someone is a suspect in mass murder. We can always afford to wait until it hits a consensus of major outlets. That it eventually becomes moot is not an excuse to rush to name someone. Acroterion (talk) 03:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That's why I chose to be careful with how I edited it. I did not add the suspect's released name in the first place, all I did was add sources to what was previously an unsourced addition to the article. I feel like what I was doing is absolutely WP:GF and done so under the full intent of making improvements to the article. If you want to warn somebody, warn the person who added the unsourced claim of the suspect's released name in the first place. Aside from the edit I made out of confusion that I had mentioned earlier here, you could very clearly see that I tried to make the information presented as accurate as possible according to sources. I reverted edits from people you should actually be warning instead of the person who added sources to previously unsourced information. B3251 (talk) 03:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've warned a lot of people. You don't get a pass for going along with an earlier BLP violation, which applies just as much to thinly sourced assertions, however benevolent your intentions might have been. Read WP:BLPCRIME, as well as the article on Richard Jewell. Acroterion (talk) 03:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Three people is not a lot, considering you didn't even warn the IP who added the name in the first place (who didn't add a source). I find it a little unfair how I'm taking the fall for simply trying to add sources to this IP's dirty work so that it isn't WP:OR. At worst, I provided citations for a previously unsourced addition of material made by an IP. I still feel that the severity of the warning I received was too harsh given the fact that I was not adding this information in the first place; I was simply adding sources for information that was not sourced, like anyone is encouraged to do. I made a mistake by not removing the information, but I feel that it is attacking to be clumped up with other Wiki users who actually did something that warranted such a stern warning. I don't think it's fair at all to make me out to be some 'defamer' when all I've done was add citations for other people's work. B3251 (talk) 04:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey @Acroterion. I don't feel satisfied having this warning on my talk page because it looks bad without context. Additionally, given the newest developments to the suspect, I don't think this needs to continue to stay here. I don't want people looking at my talk page thinking I actually "inserted unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content" because that's simply not the case given the context provided. It seems that the IP who added the suspect's name w/o a source was still never warned in the first place. I would like to remove this because it does not hold enough merit to be here given the context I provided. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feel free to remove it, it’s just an admonishment to respect policy, not a mark on your permanent record. We’re not keeping score, and editors are free to remove nearly anything on their talkpages. Acroterion (talk) 02:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I've seen others remove valid warnings on their talk pages with no explanation which people (rightfully) don't seem to generally like, so I don't want the wrong idea if I chose to remove this one. B3251 (talk) 02:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Removal is, or is supposed to taken as an assumption that whatever it is was read and understood. Editors who reinstate comments the talkpage’s owner removed shouldn’t. Acroterion (talk) 03:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for George Taylor (photographer) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Drummond, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cape Bald Packers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kings County Court House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disappearance of Kimberly Amero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I there! I would like to assist in improving the Atlantic Canada article!

--Izlhyl 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there! Thank you for your help. I've seen that you've already done work expanding the article which I absolutely commemorate. I'm currently busy with school, but I'll try to check back in as much as I can. Thanks! B3251 (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boathouse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deluxe French Fries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dyane Léger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wadea al-Fayoume.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lake family murders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint John Police Force".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erik Nissen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Drummond".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disappearance of Madison Roy-Boudreau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Disappearance of Kimberly Amero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:59, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Discord kitten has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7 § Discord kitten until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Salisbury Regional School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Borderlands 2: Captain Scarlett and Her Pirate's Booty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Canadian Content Award Hi there! I happened to see one of your recent edits pop up in my watchlist, and was reminded about a bit of a spat we were involved with on the University of New Brunswick article earlier this year. I see you've been working on a lot of Canadian content on Wikipedia, but I don't see your name beside any of the articles listed under the WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge. You might be interested in checking it out: it's a challenge to create and/or improve 10,000 Wikipedia articles on Canadian topics. It's been running for a little over 7 years now and just passed the halfway mark. Cheers! Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 23:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erin Valenti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Borderlands 2: Captain Scarlett and Her Pirate's Booty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In Sound Mind, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. Thank you for your work on Saint John West. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Walter Whyte School has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § Walter Whyte School until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Come See Me (Rod Wave song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, B3251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In Sound Mind".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]