Archives

November 2020–July 2021 August 2021–December 2021 January 2022–April 2022 May 2022–July 2022 August 2022–September 2022 October 2022–November 2022 December 2022–March 2023 April 2023–May 2023 June 2023–July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023–December 2023 January 2024–present

Just thought I'd stop by to say "Wow". I haven't been so active in recent months, but when I come back from time to tine I see all your great work on historical football topics. It is great to see someone relatively new working so diligently in this area and generating quality work. Cbl62 (talk) 16:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The College football Barnstar
		For creating and expanding high-quality content on college football players and teams and for diligent research and advocacy in saving many notable articles from deletion. In a relatively short period since 2021, the 823 articles you created have received more than 3.7 million page views! These contributions include 21 college football biographies with more than 25,000 views: Spencer Webb - 475,944 views Sam Hartman - 229,142 views Josh Sills - 131,480 views Britain Covey - 111,227 views Frank Gore Jr. - 110,607 views Reed Blankenship - 108,971 views Vinny Papale - 56,539 views Jack Stoll - 48,702 views Ledarius Mack - 46,757 views Maurice Drayton - 46,469 views Nick Rallis - 44,719 views Dicaprio Bootle - 37,674 views Christian Saulsberry - 35,272 views Tom Flacco - 34,467 views Chris Naggar - 31,753 views Amen Ogbongbemiga - 30,137 Caleb Huntley - 29,824 Christian Elliss - 29,218 Matt Leo - 28,929 Josh Pederson - 28,642 Lester Cotton - 26,159 I look forward to your next contributions. Cbl62 (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thank you very much, Cbl62 - this means a lot coming from you! And wow, I'm surprised my creations have received that many views - when I joined back in November 2020 (initially only to write two things), I would never have guessed I would go on to create things read by millions! BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Page views are an indication that people care for the subjects about which you are writing. You garnered 3.7 million views in just two-and-a-half years. That total will continue to grow in the years (and decades) ahead. Keep it up! Cbl62 (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I respectfully ask you to please strike the personal attack at the AfD for the 1901 Wilmington Conference Academy football team article. If you have an issue with my AfD nominations, you are welcome to take me to ANI. Let'srun (talk) 20:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• All I said was that it felt excessive for you to nominate an article written by me for deletion at an average of one every ~3 days. I do not see how that is a personal attack. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  It comes with the inherent accusation that I am targeting your articles for deletion, which I am not. I am targeting articles which do not meet the criteria met by WP:NSEASONS, some of which were created by you, and many more which were not. Once again, I ask for you to strike that part of your post. Let'srun (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  If you are not targeting my articles, then I truly wonder how you found to tag for notability Marshall Edwards, Pete Swanson, Frank Robinson and Joe Rowe – four completely unrelated football players who are listed as my creations mostly in that order from the same month – all in a span of four minutes? Or how did you find the 1916 Tusculum Pioneers football team – an article outside your NSEASONS-deletion focus of the 1800s-1900s but related to an article I wrote? Or how did you find six consecutive of my unrelated season creations all to be ones you thought worthy of AFD nomination in that order? BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Using categories created for the respective teams, and the early college football seasons. I also nominated season articles from the 1920s [[1]] so I'm confused how the 1916 article is outside that focus of the first roughly 50 seasons of plainly non-notable "season" articles. For the last time, I ask you to strike that comment. Let'srun (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  And about Edwards, Swanson, Robinson and Rowe? BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: And quite interesting that immediately after this, you mass maintenance tag for notability many of the season articles by me for three different programs, with no others not related to me; no, one does not randomly come across so many programs created by me when there's at least ten times as many similar articles from different programs in the same shape and state. And even if that's all random, I still ask: what about Edwards, Swanson, Robinson and Rowe? BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  I'm confused, were you/are you MisterCake? That is who created the Lewisburg articles I tagged. Let'srun (talk) 03:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: One season after the 1883 Lewisburg football team – 1887 Bucknell football team – an article I created. Also avoiding Edwards, Swanson, Robinson and Rowe... BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  I already answered that above. Categories....Let'srun (talk) 03:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: Pete Swanson and Marshall Edwards literally have no categories in common... how could you possibly find them both in the span of a minute, aside from looking at my user page, where they are listed directly next to each other as some of my earliest work? BeanieFan11 (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Because there are ways to switch queries beyond who created the article? Let'srun (talk) 04:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: I'm finding your response difficult to understand; but the only place these articles (Swanson, Edwards) are connected are at my userpage, where they are listed next to each other. There are no "categories" that connect them; considering the thousands of NFL stubs, how could your "queries" come across only mine? BeanieFan11 (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  They don't. You just picked 4 articles that I have tagged which were created by you through searching multiple categories of NFL teams (and you have hundreds of articles). I don't have any issue with the vast majority of your articles, just because I maybe disagree with 1-2% of your creations (if that) does not mean I am single-handedly targeting them. Let'srun (talk) 00:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: You're avoiding the question; tell me exactly how you found those four completely unrelated articles in a span of four minutes. Also interesting how immediately after my comment at 4:28 you voted "delete" at two AFDs I contributed inclusion-leaning comments to (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussain Ali Nasayyif, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tirioro Willie) in rapid succession with no others for a good 10+ minutes, then immediately after your response here you find another of them in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Schwegler. Quite interesting. But aside from that, answer the question: tell me, exactly, how you came across Swanson, Edwards, Robinson and Rowe in four minutes. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  I'll repeat myself: searching multiple categories of NFL teams. Let'srun (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: OK - so in four minutes, you randomly searched Category:Brooklyn Dodgers (NFL) players, completely randomly came across, out of over 200 others, Marshall Edwards which I happened to create, found it to tag for notability; one minute later, randomly searched Category:Los Angeles Rams players, containing over 1,000, and randomly choose to tag for notability Pete Swanson, the article I created right after Edwards; then one minute later randomly searched Category:St. Louis Rams players, a category of over 800, randomly found Joe Rowe, which I coincidentally created right after Swanson; and then one minute later, searched Category:Denver Broncos players, a category of ~1,600, and randomly found to tag for notability Frank Robinson, whom I also coincidentally happened to create right around the time of Rowe? If so, that is the most amazing coincidence I have heard of in my life. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  @Let'srun: How about this: why don't you tell me, exactly, how you came across these articles (Swanson, Edwards, Robinson, Rowe), and we can end this discussion? BeanieFan11 (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... that Keshawn Banks' only NFL appearance came in the playoffs?

Hope you take it to DYK! Could be a good hook about his only game being in the playoffs :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thanks for the message! I hadn't thought of that as a potential DYK hook, but will nominate it soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • A few interesting WP:PACKERS ones to consider for the Wikicup: John Martinkovic, Clyde Van Sickle, Hank Bruder, Joe Laws, George Svendsen, Charley Brock, Bob Monnett and Red Dunn. All short stubs on interesting players who were in the early years of the NFL and played a lot of seasons! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Thanks - probably will do most of the work in the later rounds of the competition - also newspapers.com seems to be down so I can't do any currently - but thanks for the list :) BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi BeanieFan11, I hope you are doing well. Whenever you have some free time, could you please help me find additional sources for Anthony Tieku, aside from the ones I have already cited in the article? Also, I noticed some references on Newspapers.com, but I do not have the subscription for it! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I can take a look at some point soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1893 Western Maryland Green Terror football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because per request at Liz's Talk. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Star Mississippi 13:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Thanks for restoring and draftifiying. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Any time. Clearly the script knew your record-keeping preferences better than I :D

  Happy editing. Star Mississippi 03:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:UC San Diego Tritons football seasons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Let'srun (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgetown football, pre–1890 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown football, pre–1890 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

adjacent AfD

assume you're watching, but since I forgot to ping you, I draftified 1881 Georgetown football team for you per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1881 Georgetown football team until this discussion is resolved and the target can be sorted. Not watching the draft, so just ping me if you need anything. Star Mississippi 02:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Star Mississippi: Thanks, but as you can see in my last comment there I created Georgetown football, 1874–1889 so that draftification wouldn't be needed; its pretty much figured out that it (1881) only needs to be redirected to that page now (which looks like its heading towards keep, as the AFD for it was a bit silly). Thanks, and sorry if I am creating any extra work for you. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No worries. I'll be honest, I was a little confused by the end of the discussion (not your fault, just the volume) and the subsequent AfD. Didn't want to do the redirect and then have it lost as a G8 if the AfD didn't close as retained.

Want me to redirect the draft or you'll do so when it closes? No preference on my end. It's just a few clicks, so less work than if you needed to ask for it. Star Mississippi 03:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll just redirect it myself once the AFD is closed. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BTW @Star Mississippi: would you be willing to restore the AFD-deleted List of current National Football League staffs to something like Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/List of current National Football League staffs? I've found it useful in the past for editing purposes and it seems there's others who did as well. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @BeanieFan11. I'm going to decline this one. Given there was a clear consensus against that article continuing to exist (vs the others where the material is fine, it's just a question of where it should live and you creating the requisite merger targets, etc.) I feel restoring it would overrule community consensus. I have a feeling it will land at DRV, which I'm OK with. I feel like this information should probably live somewhere, it just probably isnt on Wiki. Let me know if you need more info. Star Mississippi 03:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Star Mississippi: Just to be clear, I'm not asking for it to be part of mainspace again; the list is useful for editors in making changes relating to NFL team staffs and coaches, etc. so I think it would be good in projectspace like you did before with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Football League players with unidentified given names. If you don't think the community consensus supports such an action, I may bring it to DRV to check if you're alright with that (not exactly disagreeing with the closure, which I think was correct, just I think it would serve purpose in projectspace to assist editors like myself in contributing). BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm absolutely fine with that DRV, @BeanieFan11 and if you do so this evening please feel free to point to this discussion as my blessing to explore the target as I'm about to log off. I'll weigh in to support it when I log back on. I think in this case the DRV would be more productive to establish the new location than a restoration and move which I think would lead to MfD especially since the ANI requester's userpage version was speedied and the last thing we need is even more bureaucracy. It's similar to the so-called permission to allow recreation vs. a G4 that we sometimes see in DRV. I was hoping for an ATD but your position didn't seem to get much traction whereas I think in this request for Project space, it might once folks aren't looking at notability. FWIW if I'd participated as an editor, I probably would have !voted the same as you did. It's useful, but alas it isn't notable nor really could it ever be. Is that helpful? Star Mississippi 03:23, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I'll open one tomorrow. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(talk page stalker) Eh, I didn't comment at that AfD because I couldn't come up with a guideline-based reason for keeping but I think it's a useful navigational aid. It's not everyday a reader complains about an article that was deleted. Not sure it's too different from the lists in Category:Lists of current team rosters. Also, technically you could just transclude the templates yourself in projectspace but that's not going to help readers. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wasn't able to get to it today, but I'll make sure I do at some point soon. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 29 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ken Moore (American football), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Cave Man Kenny" was a "fast-charging, hard-hitting" "ubiquitous" "obstreperous iron man" with "dependable shoulders"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ken Moore (American football). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ken Moore (American football)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome BeanieFan11! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:39, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

On 2 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patrick O'Connell (American football), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Patrick O'Connell made his NFL debut on his birthday, in the only game he played that year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patrick O'Connell (American football). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Patrick O'Connell (American football)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Goldey–Beacom Lightning baseball coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Beacom College men's basketball coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Beacom College football coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Goldey–Beacom Lightning men's soccer coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 4 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Twink Twining, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dr. Twink Twining was a Major League Baseball player? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Twink Twining. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Twink Twining), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 7 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nick Whiteside, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nick Whiteside overcame a torn Achilles tendon in 2021 and a broken foot in 2022 to play in the National Football League in 2023? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nick Whiteside. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nick Whiteside), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, BeanieFan11. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... that Ibraheim Campbell wore a different jersey number every year of his 7-year career. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)]Reply[reply]

• That's a lot of different jersey numbers! The only one with more that I can think of off the top of my head is Cal Hubbard, with eight in eight years (although it wasn't a different one each year; one was for two seasons). BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to BeanieFan11 for collecting more than 100 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

		Geneva mechanism Award
		This award is given in recognition to BeanieFan11 for collecting at least 25 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:BeanieFan11/Bill Collins (American football player), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BeanieFan11/Bill Collins (American football player) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:BeanieFan11/Bill Collins (American football player) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 19:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1903 Western Illinois Purple and Gold football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1903 Western Illinois Purple and Gold football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 22:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Goldey–Beacom Lightning men's soccer indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Goldey–Beacom Lightning baseball indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Beacom College men's basketball indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I deleted the above empty categories early in order to link to the cause, Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_3#Category:Beacom_College_football_coaches. If you have any other material with which to repopulate them, I will happily undelete them. – Fayenatic London 18:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 15 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keshawn Banks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Keshawn Banks's only NFL appearance came in the playoffs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Keshawn Banks. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keshawn Banks), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BeanieFan11 Patrol the page Fisayomi Abebi Thanks. Jutos222 (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• @Jutos222: Sorry, I don't review pages on request. I am sure a NPP member will get to it at their earliest convenience. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 17 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andy Dickerson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that offensive lineman Andy Dickerson is not to be confused with offensive lineman Andy Dickerson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Dickerson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Andy Dickerson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On 17 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andy Dickerson (offensive lineman, born 1963), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that offensive lineman Andy Dickerson is not to be confused with offensive lineman Andy Dickerson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Dickerson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Andy Dickerson (offensive lineman, born 1963)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Brandon Coleman (offensive lineman) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! grungaloo (talk) 17:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]